STAGES OF LEGAL DISCOURSE DEVELOPMENT IN LINGUISTICS

Nuriya Jumaniyozova
{"title":"STAGES OF LEGAL DISCOURSE DEVELOPMENT IN LINGUISTICS","authors":"Nuriya Jumaniyozova","doi":"10.36078/987654507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the term ‘discourse’ has been defined by many researchers in linguistics, it still remains an abstract concept. This is because there are different views on discourse and text, discourse and language, and discourse and speech oppositions, and the study of this problem in linguistics is of a particular importance. Besides linguistics, ‘discourse’ is also studied in sociology, anthropology, philosophy, and other fields as the primary research object of social theories. And this requires an interdisciplinary study of this issue. Today discourse is considered in the framework of Forensic linguistics, which connects jurisprudence and linguistics, and the disclosure of the linguistic and extralinguistic features of legal discourse is one of the main goals and objectives of this field. Institutional discourse, which differs from colloquial discourse in terms of direction, speech constraints, structure, purpose, and other characteristics, it is divided into political, administrative, religious, advertising, and other subtypes. Legal discourse, which is a type of institutional discourse, manifests itself as a statutory institutional dialogue and involves its participants, namely the judge-defendant-lawyer-prosecutor- witness, and so on. This article defines legal discourse as the object of research, and before the author writes about the development of this discourse, she describes the use of discourse as a linguistic term, its typology, legal discourse, and its peculiarities. Moreover, the research article examines the English and Uzbek legal discourse within specific periods and provides the legal language and terms that are actively employed in each period.\nThe study aims to compare the periodic formation of the English and Uzbek legal discourse, as well as to present the changes and differences in the legal language and terminology over the centuries and to illustrate them with examples. To this end, the opinions of various linguists and lawyers, and many historical sources have been provided and scientifically substantiated.","PeriodicalId":161777,"journal":{"name":"Philology matters","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36078/987654507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the term ‘discourse’ has been defined by many researchers in linguistics, it still remains an abstract concept. This is because there are different views on discourse and text, discourse and language, and discourse and speech oppositions, and the study of this problem in linguistics is of a particular importance. Besides linguistics, ‘discourse’ is also studied in sociology, anthropology, philosophy, and other fields as the primary research object of social theories. And this requires an interdisciplinary study of this issue. Today discourse is considered in the framework of Forensic linguistics, which connects jurisprudence and linguistics, and the disclosure of the linguistic and extralinguistic features of legal discourse is one of the main goals and objectives of this field. Institutional discourse, which differs from colloquial discourse in terms of direction, speech constraints, structure, purpose, and other characteristics, it is divided into political, administrative, religious, advertising, and other subtypes. Legal discourse, which is a type of institutional discourse, manifests itself as a statutory institutional dialogue and involves its participants, namely the judge-defendant-lawyer-prosecutor- witness, and so on. This article defines legal discourse as the object of research, and before the author writes about the development of this discourse, she describes the use of discourse as a linguistic term, its typology, legal discourse, and its peculiarities. Moreover, the research article examines the English and Uzbek legal discourse within specific periods and provides the legal language and terms that are actively employed in each period. The study aims to compare the periodic formation of the English and Uzbek legal discourse, as well as to present the changes and differences in the legal language and terminology over the centuries and to illustrate them with examples. To this end, the opinions of various linguists and lawyers, and many historical sources have been provided and scientifically substantiated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言学中法律语篇发展的阶段
虽然“语篇”一词已经被许多语言学研究者所定义,但它仍然是一个抽象的概念。这是因为人们对语篇与语篇、语篇与语言、语篇与言语对立等问题有不同的看法,语言学对这一问题的研究具有特殊的重要性。除了语言学之外,社会学、人类学、哲学等领域也将“话语”作为社会理论的主要研究对象进行研究。这需要对这个问题进行跨学科的研究。今天,话语是在法律语言学的框架内考虑的,它将法理学和语言学联系起来,揭示法律话语的语言和语言外特征是该领域的主要目标和目的之一。制度语篇在方向、言语约束、结构、目的等特征上不同于口语语篇,分为政治语篇、行政语篇、宗教语篇、广告语篇等亚型。法律话语是一种制度性话语,它表现为一种法定的制度性对话,涉及到法官-被告-律师-检察官-证人等主体。本文将法律话语定义为研究对象,在作者撰写这一话语的发展之前,她描述了话语作为一种语言术语的使用、它的类型、法律话语及其特点。此外,研究文章考察了特定时期的英语和乌兹别克语法律话语,并提供了在每个时期积极使用的法律语言和术语。该研究的目的是比较英语和乌兹别克法律话语的周期性形成,以及介绍几个世纪以来法律语言和术语的变化和差异,并举例说明。为此,各种语言学家和律师的意见以及许多历史资料都被提供并得到科学证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FORS VA DARIY TILLARIDA OTLARDA SON KATEGORIYASI EY UNDOVI MUROJAAT OBYEKTI SIFATIDA TRANSLATION PROBLEMS AND THEIR SOLUTIONS STAGES OF LEGAL DISCOURSE DEVELOPMENT IN LINGUISTICS COMPARATIVE-TYPOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STATUS OF SIMPLE AND COMPLEX SENTENCES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1