Comparasion between TiO2 thin films deposited by DC and RF sputtering.

R. Cesar, A. Pascon, J. A. Diniz, E. Joanni, M. Mederos, R. Texeira
{"title":"Comparasion between TiO2 thin films deposited by DC and RF sputtering.","authors":"R. Cesar, A. Pascon, J. A. Diniz, E. Joanni, M. Mederos, R. Texeira","doi":"10.1109/SBMicro.2019.8919318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares titanium oxide (TiO2) thin films deposited by RF and DC sputtering. Structural characterization was used to investigate the morphology of TiO2 thin films. Both films show the rutile and anatase crystal structure; ellipsometry show thickness and refractive index of 50 nm and 2.43 for the TiO2 deposited by DC sputtering and 40 nm and 2.32 for the film by RF sputtering; AFM shows the roots mean square (RMS) roughness of 6.5 nm and 8 nm for TiO2 deposited by DC and RF sputtering, respectively. For electrical characterization was developed MOS capacitor; from them was possible to determine which method forms the best dielectric film, defined by high dielectric constant value (high-k), lower charge density (Q0/q) and flat-band voltage (VFB) around -0.9V. Therefore, the best method to deposit TiO2 is DC reactive sputtering; because this method showed a better electrical conditions and a well-defined crystalline structure","PeriodicalId":403446,"journal":{"name":"2019 34th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices (SBMicro)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 34th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices (SBMicro)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBMicro.2019.8919318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper compares titanium oxide (TiO2) thin films deposited by RF and DC sputtering. Structural characterization was used to investigate the morphology of TiO2 thin films. Both films show the rutile and anatase crystal structure; ellipsometry show thickness and refractive index of 50 nm and 2.43 for the TiO2 deposited by DC sputtering and 40 nm and 2.32 for the film by RF sputtering; AFM shows the roots mean square (RMS) roughness of 6.5 nm and 8 nm for TiO2 deposited by DC and RF sputtering, respectively. For electrical characterization was developed MOS capacitor; from them was possible to determine which method forms the best dielectric film, defined by high dielectric constant value (high-k), lower charge density (Q0/q) and flat-band voltage (VFB) around -0.9V. Therefore, the best method to deposit TiO2 is DC reactive sputtering; because this method showed a better electrical conditions and a well-defined crystalline structure
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直流和射频溅射制备TiO2薄膜的比较。
本文比较了射频溅射和直流溅射制备氧化钛(TiO2)薄膜的性能。采用结构表征方法研究了TiO2薄膜的形貌。两种薄膜均呈现金红石和锐钛矿的晶体结构;椭偏仪显示,直流溅射法制备的TiO2薄膜厚度为50 nm,折射率为2.43;射频溅射法制备的TiO2薄膜厚度为40 nm,折射率为2.32;AFM结果表明,直流溅射和射频溅射制备的TiO2的RMS粗糙度分别为6.5 nm和8 nm。为进行电学表征,研制了MOS电容器;从中可以确定哪种方法形成最好的介电膜,其定义为高介电常数值(high-k),低电荷密度(Q0/q)和-0.9V左右的平带电压(VFB)。因此,沉积TiO2的最佳方法是直流反应溅射;因为这种方法具有较好的电学条件和良好的晶体结构
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Low Saturation Onset MOS Transistor: an Equivalent Network Synthesis and Electrical properties of polyaniline yielded in nickel sulfate salt A Negative-Bias-Temperature-Instability Study on Omega-Gate Silicon Nanowire SOI pMOSFETs Comparasion between TiO2 thin films deposited by DC and RF sputtering. A 4 mm toroidal microtransformer built with wire bonding and MCM technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1