Social Protection and Sustainable Poverty Reduction: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh

Akhter U. Ahmed, Melissa Hidrobo, J. Hoddinott, Bastien Koch, Shalini Roy, Salauddin Tauseef
{"title":"Social Protection and Sustainable Poverty Reduction: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh","authors":"Akhter U. Ahmed, Melissa Hidrobo, J. Hoddinott, Bastien Koch, Shalini Roy, Salauddin Tauseef","doi":"10.2499/p15738coll2.134221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social protection programs are primarily focused on influencing household behavior in the short term, increasing consumption to reduce poverty and food insecurity, and promoting investments in human capital. A large body of evidence across numerous settings shows that cash and food transfer programs are highly effective in doing so. However, there is growing interest in understanding the extent to which such programs can help households stay out of poverty in the longer term, specifically after transfers end. We bring new evidence to this question, re-interviewing Bangladeshi households that participated in a well-implemented randomized social protection intervention four years after it ended. We find that combining transfers, either cash or food, with behavior change communication activities sustainably reduced poverty. Cash transfers alone had sustainable effects, but these were context-specific. The beneficial impacts of food transfers did not persist four years after the intervention finished.","PeriodicalId":365834,"journal":{"name":"Food Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Laws","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Social protection programs are primarily focused on influencing household behavior in the short term, increasing consumption to reduce poverty and food insecurity, and promoting investments in human capital. A large body of evidence across numerous settings shows that cash and food transfer programs are highly effective in doing so. However, there is growing interest in understanding the extent to which such programs can help households stay out of poverty in the longer term, specifically after transfers end. We bring new evidence to this question, re-interviewing Bangladeshi households that participated in a well-implemented randomized social protection intervention four years after it ended. We find that combining transfers, either cash or food, with behavior change communication activities sustainably reduced poverty. Cash transfers alone had sustainable effects, but these were context-specific. The beneficial impacts of food transfers did not persist four years after the intervention finished.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会保护和可持续减贫:来自孟加拉国的实验证据
社会保护计划主要侧重于在短期内影响家庭行为,增加消费以减少贫困和粮食不安全,以及促进人力资本投资。大量证据表明,现金和粮食转移计划在这方面非常有效。然而,人们越来越有兴趣了解这些项目能在多大程度上帮助家庭在长期内摆脱贫困,特别是在转移支付结束后。我们为这个问题提供了新的证据,重新采访了参与了一项实施良好的随机社会保护干预四年后的孟加拉国家庭。我们发现,将现金或食物转移与行为改变沟通活动相结合,可以可持续地减少贫困。现金转移本身具有可持续的影响,但这些影响是根据具体情况而定的。粮食转移的有益影响在干预结束四年后并未持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Appendices to the Rise of Plain Language Laws Consumer Perception and Preference towards Genetically Modified (GM) Foods: Bibliometric Evidence and Policy Imperatives Women's Group Farming on Leased Land The Experience of Pradan in Odisha Nutrition Sensitive Food Systems in Conflict Affected Regions: A Case Study of Afghanistan Social Protection and Sustainable Poverty Reduction: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1