Consumer Perception and Preference towards Genetically Modified (GM) Foods: Bibliometric Evidence and Policy Imperatives

Food Laws Pub Date : 2021-07-08 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3882657
S. R, J. Nyika, S. Yadav, J. Mackolil, Rama Prashat G, Endashaw Workie, R. Ragupathy, P. Ramasundaram
{"title":"Consumer Perception and Preference towards Genetically Modified (GM) Foods: Bibliometric Evidence and Policy Imperatives","authors":"S. R, J. Nyika, S. Yadav, J. Mackolil, Rama Prashat G, Endashaw Workie, R. Ragupathy, P. Ramasundaram","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3882657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Genetically modified (GM) foods could be a promising option to reduce the dependence of the agri-food system on conventional means of crop improvement. However, the safety of GM food remains a concern, in addition to the perceived and real risks to environment. The opinion about scientific evidence among researchers, policymakers and government regulators on promotion of GM foods for consumers differ. This study presents the trends emerging from research outputs on consumer perception and preference for GM foods and policy prescriptions for enabling the consumption.<br><br>Scope and Approach: The study mainly focused on (1) exploring the publication trends, geographic focus of research and a comprehensive review on the consumers’ perception of and preference to GM foods, (2) identifying research hotspots and emerging genetically modified organisms (GMO) research themes, (3) assessing the integrated nature of GMO research, and (4) suggesting policy prescriptions on challenges and way forward. Bibliometric analyses have been performed using the Web of Science (WOS) database sourcing literature from 1981 to 2021 and analyzed the final sample of 543 publications using BibExcel and VOSviewer visualization software tools. The search strategy utilized the topic basis search of phrases related to GM food preference and perception.<br><br>Key Findings and Conclusions: The search query retrieving 543 journal articles showed an increasing trend in publications on consumer’s response towards GM foods. Thematic analysis revealed a strong interlinkage of GMOs research with ‘agriculture’ and ‘food science technology’. Consumers’ positive response is largely influenced by the decision of the governments to ban or approve the GM crops cultivation. Similarly, the public support increases when the potential benefits of the technology are well articulated, consumption increases with a price discount, people’s trust on the government and belief in science increases with a positive influence by the media. Mapping of the retrieved articles showed the top four recurrent keywords: GMOs, biotechnology, attitudes and acceptance. Europe and the USA are the first region and country, respectively, in terms of the number of active institutions per research output, per capita GDP publication and citations per article. The National Natural Science Foundation of China, followed by the National University of Malaysia are the top fundraisers for research on GM food consumption, perceptions and attitudes. Although research outputs on GM food consumer's acceptance and preferences are increasing, a majority of publications came from developed nations. Thus, intensive research is yet to be carried out in developing countries to produce a genetically modified food product with superior properties and substantial equivalence with no significant side-effects. We suggest research-, agri-food industries-, and society-oriented policies needed to be implemented by the stakeholders to ensure the safety of GM food products, encourage consumer-based studies, and increase public awareness towards these food products. <br>","PeriodicalId":365834,"journal":{"name":"Food Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Laws","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3882657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Genetically modified (GM) foods could be a promising option to reduce the dependence of the agri-food system on conventional means of crop improvement. However, the safety of GM food remains a concern, in addition to the perceived and real risks to environment. The opinion about scientific evidence among researchers, policymakers and government regulators on promotion of GM foods for consumers differ. This study presents the trends emerging from research outputs on consumer perception and preference for GM foods and policy prescriptions for enabling the consumption.

Scope and Approach: The study mainly focused on (1) exploring the publication trends, geographic focus of research and a comprehensive review on the consumers’ perception of and preference to GM foods, (2) identifying research hotspots and emerging genetically modified organisms (GMO) research themes, (3) assessing the integrated nature of GMO research, and (4) suggesting policy prescriptions on challenges and way forward. Bibliometric analyses have been performed using the Web of Science (WOS) database sourcing literature from 1981 to 2021 and analyzed the final sample of 543 publications using BibExcel and VOSviewer visualization software tools. The search strategy utilized the topic basis search of phrases related to GM food preference and perception.

Key Findings and Conclusions: The search query retrieving 543 journal articles showed an increasing trend in publications on consumer’s response towards GM foods. Thematic analysis revealed a strong interlinkage of GMOs research with ‘agriculture’ and ‘food science technology’. Consumers’ positive response is largely influenced by the decision of the governments to ban or approve the GM crops cultivation. Similarly, the public support increases when the potential benefits of the technology are well articulated, consumption increases with a price discount, people’s trust on the government and belief in science increases with a positive influence by the media. Mapping of the retrieved articles showed the top four recurrent keywords: GMOs, biotechnology, attitudes and acceptance. Europe and the USA are the first region and country, respectively, in terms of the number of active institutions per research output, per capita GDP publication and citations per article. The National Natural Science Foundation of China, followed by the National University of Malaysia are the top fundraisers for research on GM food consumption, perceptions and attitudes. Although research outputs on GM food consumer's acceptance and preferences are increasing, a majority of publications came from developed nations. Thus, intensive research is yet to be carried out in developing countries to produce a genetically modified food product with superior properties and substantial equivalence with no significant side-effects. We suggest research-, agri-food industries-, and society-oriented policies needed to be implemented by the stakeholders to ensure the safety of GM food products, encourage consumer-based studies, and increase public awareness towards these food products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者对转基因食品的认知和偏好:文献计量证据和政策要求
背景:转基因食品可能是减少农业食品系统对传统作物改良手段依赖的一个有希望的选择。然而,除了对环境的感知和实际风险之外,转基因食品的安全性仍然是一个令人担忧的问题。在向消费者推广转基因食品的问题上,研究人员、政策制定者和政府监管机构对科学证据的看法存在分歧。本研究介绍了消费者对转基因食品的认知和偏好的研究成果所产生的趋势以及促进消费的政策处方。研究范围和方法:研究主要集中在:(1)探索转基因食品的出版趋势、研究的地理焦点和消费者对转基因食品的认知和偏好的综合综述;(2)确定研究热点和新兴的转基因生物研究主题;(3)评估转基因研究的整体性;(4)提出挑战和前进方向的政策建议。使用Web of Science (WOS)数据库对1981 - 2021年的文献进行文献计量分析,并使用BibExcel和VOSviewer可视化软件工具对543份出版物的最终样本进行分析。搜索策略利用了基于主题的转基因食品偏好和感知相关短语搜索。主要发现和结论:检索到的543篇期刊文章显示,关于消费者对转基因食品反应的出版物呈增加趋势。专题分析揭示了转基因生物研究与“农业”和“食品科学技术”之间的紧密联系。消费者的积极反应很大程度上受到政府禁止或批准转基因作物种植的决定的影响。同样,当一项技术的潜在好处被很好地表达出来,消费随着价格的折扣而增加,人们对政府的信任和对科学的信仰随着媒体的积极影响而增加时,公众的支持也会增加。检索到的文章的地图显示了四个最常出现的关键词:转基因生物、生物技术、态度和接受度。在每项研究产出的活跃机构数量、人均GDP出版物数量和每篇文章被引用次数方面,欧洲和美国分别位居第一和国家。中国国家自然科学基金会和马来西亚国立大学是转基因食品消费、认知和态度研究的最大筹款机构。虽然关于转基因食品消费者接受度和偏好的研究成果正在增加,但大多数出版物来自发达国家。因此,发展中国家还需要进行深入的研究,以生产出一种具有优越性能和实质等同性而没有重大副作用的转基因食品。我们建议利益相关者需要实施面向研究、农业食品工业和社会的政策,以确保转基因食品的安全性,鼓励以消费者为基础的研究,并提高公众对这些食品的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Appendices to the Rise of Plain Language Laws Consumer Perception and Preference towards Genetically Modified (GM) Foods: Bibliometric Evidence and Policy Imperatives Women's Group Farming on Leased Land The Experience of Pradan in Odisha Nutrition Sensitive Food Systems in Conflict Affected Regions: A Case Study of Afghanistan Social Protection and Sustainable Poverty Reduction: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1