Women's Group Farming on Leased Land The Experience of Pradan in Odisha

Food Laws Pub Date : 2021-03-26 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3813038
P. Choudhury, P. Mohapatra
{"title":"Women's Group Farming on Leased Land The Experience of Pradan in Odisha","authors":"P. Choudhury, P. Mohapatra","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3813038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women’s groups have emerged as an important platform for promoting the economic, political and social empowerment of poor women. In India, Self Help Groups (SHGs), are becoming substantially involved in agricultural development activities, largely through the National Rural Livelihoods Mission platforms (NRLM) and with the assistance of NGOs. \n \nIn the tribal areas of Odisha, women farmers’ access to land is low, even though they are closely involved in farming activities. In fact, most tribal women are legally landless, meaning, either they don’t own land or own less than one standard acre (a minimum area required to ensure food production for an average family). \n \nIndividual forest rights are now being recently formally recognized under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, which requires that both spouses’ names are recorded. The Record of Rights (RoR) maintained by the Revenue Department lacks a column to record the landholder’s gender and does not always record land jointly in the name of wife and husband. As most of the agricultural land titles are maintained in the RoR, women lack recognition as landowners and hence women farmers. \n \nInterventions \n \nPRADAN, an NGO with considerable experience of working with SHGs and agriculture, used collective farming as a strategy in Rayagada district to augment the livelihoods of tribal women SHG members and also to support their recognition, at least among local actors, as women farmers. \n \nAlong with a strong institutional support system, PRADAN assisted the women’s groups to lease in private land and also cultivate on government land, with the consent of the village community, supported by robust extension, communication, convergence and market linkages, to significantly increase their farm income. \n \nLessons \n \nGroup farming can be an alternative production model for women farmers to pool land, labour and capital to create larger farms, improve their agricultural income and also become recognised as women farmers at least by local actors. \n \nIn the absence of legal sanction and enforceability of the leasing arrangements - which are informal, due to the prevailing legal framework banning agricultural land leasing in Odisha - these groups, however, face the risk of landlords either demanding higher rents after witnessing the increasing profitability of group-farming or preferring to withdraw their land from the lease arrangement due to their fear of losing the land to the SHG through long-term possession, as per existing laws. \n \nAs most women farmers are landless, lack land records and operate through informal land leasing, they are also not eligible as individual farmers to access formal credit and government entitlements, which affect the profitability of group farming and individual returns, in addition to the pace and inclusivity of agricultural transformation.","PeriodicalId":365834,"journal":{"name":"Food Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Laws","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3813038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women’s groups have emerged as an important platform for promoting the economic, political and social empowerment of poor women. In India, Self Help Groups (SHGs), are becoming substantially involved in agricultural development activities, largely through the National Rural Livelihoods Mission platforms (NRLM) and with the assistance of NGOs. In the tribal areas of Odisha, women farmers’ access to land is low, even though they are closely involved in farming activities. In fact, most tribal women are legally landless, meaning, either they don’t own land or own less than one standard acre (a minimum area required to ensure food production for an average family). Individual forest rights are now being recently formally recognized under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, which requires that both spouses’ names are recorded. The Record of Rights (RoR) maintained by the Revenue Department lacks a column to record the landholder’s gender and does not always record land jointly in the name of wife and husband. As most of the agricultural land titles are maintained in the RoR, women lack recognition as landowners and hence women farmers. Interventions PRADAN, an NGO with considerable experience of working with SHGs and agriculture, used collective farming as a strategy in Rayagada district to augment the livelihoods of tribal women SHG members and also to support their recognition, at least among local actors, as women farmers. Along with a strong institutional support system, PRADAN assisted the women’s groups to lease in private land and also cultivate on government land, with the consent of the village community, supported by robust extension, communication, convergence and market linkages, to significantly increase their farm income. Lessons Group farming can be an alternative production model for women farmers to pool land, labour and capital to create larger farms, improve their agricultural income and also become recognised as women farmers at least by local actors. In the absence of legal sanction and enforceability of the leasing arrangements - which are informal, due to the prevailing legal framework banning agricultural land leasing in Odisha - these groups, however, face the risk of landlords either demanding higher rents after witnessing the increasing profitability of group-farming or preferring to withdraw their land from the lease arrangement due to their fear of losing the land to the SHG through long-term possession, as per existing laws. As most women farmers are landless, lack land records and operate through informal land leasing, they are also not eligible as individual farmers to access formal credit and government entitlements, which affect the profitability of group farming and individual returns, in addition to the pace and inclusivity of agricultural transformation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女在租赁土地上的集体耕作&普拉丹在奥里萨邦的经验
妇女团体已成为促进赋予贫穷妇女经济、政治和社会权力的重要平台。在印度,自助团体(shg)正在大量参与农业发展活动,主要是通过国家农村生计任务平台(NRLM)和非政府组织的协助。在奥里萨邦的部落地区,尽管女性农民密切参与农业活动,但她们获得土地的机会很低。事实上,大多数部落妇女在法律上是无地的,这意味着她们要么没有土地,要么拥有的土地少于一标准英亩(确保一个普通家庭粮食生产所需的最小面积)。2006年《森林权利法案》最近正式承认了个人的森林权利,该法案要求夫妻双方的姓名都要记录在案。由税务局保存的《土地权登记册》没有一栏记录土地持有人的性别,也并不总是以夫妻两人的名义共同记录土地。由于大多数农业土地所有权保留在农村地区,妇女作为土地所有者和妇女农民的身份得不到承认。PRADAN是一个非政府组织,在与SHG和农业合作方面有着丰富的经验,它在Rayagada地区将集体农业作为一项战略,以提高部落妇女SHG成员的生计,并支持至少在当地行动者中承认她们是女农民。除了强有力的制度支持系统外,PRADAN还协助妇女团体在得到村社区同意的情况下,在强有力的推广、沟通、融合和市场联系的支持下,租赁私人土地和在政府土地上耕种,从而大大增加了她们的农业收入。集体耕作可以成为另一种生产模式,让女性农民汇集土地、劳动力和资本,创建更大的农场,提高农业收入,并至少被当地行动者认可为女性农民。由于现行法律框架禁止奥里萨邦的农业土地租赁,这些租赁安排是非正式的,因此缺乏法律制裁和可执行性。然而,这些群体面临的风险是,房东要么在目睹集体农业的盈利能力不断提高后要求更高的租金,要么更愿意从租赁安排中撤回他们的土地,因为他们担心根据现行法律,土地会因长期占有而被SHG夺走。由于大多数女农民没有土地,没有土地记录,并通过非正式的土地租赁进行经营,她们也没有资格作为个体农民获得正式的信贷和政府权利,这影响了集体农业的盈利能力和个人回报,以及农业转型的速度和包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Appendices to the Rise of Plain Language Laws Consumer Perception and Preference towards Genetically Modified (GM) Foods: Bibliometric Evidence and Policy Imperatives Women's Group Farming on Leased Land The Experience of Pradan in Odisha Nutrition Sensitive Food Systems in Conflict Affected Regions: A Case Study of Afghanistan Social Protection and Sustainable Poverty Reduction: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1