12.2 A1.8V 30-to-70MHz 87% peak-efficiency 0.32mm2 4-phase time-based buck converter consuming 3μA/MHz quiescent current in 65nm CMOS

S. Kim, R. Nandwana, Q. Khan, R. Pilawa-Podgurski, P. Hanumolu
{"title":"12.2 A1.8V 30-to-70MHz 87% peak-efficiency 0.32mm2 4-phase time-based buck converter consuming 3μA/MHz quiescent current in 65nm CMOS","authors":"S. Kim, R. Nandwana, Q. Khan, R. Pilawa-Podgurski, P. Hanumolu","doi":"10.1109/ISSCC.2015.7063003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-phase switching DC-DC converters offer many advantages in terms of high output power, low ripple, fast load transient response, high efficiency across a very wide range of load currents, and alleviated output filter requirements. However, the need for complex controllers that ensure accurate regulation and uniform current sharing between phases along with generation of multiple matched pulse-width modulated (PWM) signals complicate the design of multi-phase converters. Hysteretic control offers the simplest means to implement multi-phase converters and has been widely used in the prior art [1]. However, its nonlinear behavior leads to large output ripple, unpredictable loop dynamics, and wide variation in switching frequency (Fsw), which are undesirable in many noise-sensitive applications. Furthermore, they require current sensors to implement active current sharing, and generation of multiple synchronized PWM signals requires power hungry circuits [1]. A voltage-mode controller using a type-Ill compensator is well-suited for low-noise applications but it requires multiple synchronized and matched ramp generators that also incur large area and power penalty. A digital PWM generator can provide accurately matched multi-phase PWM signals thereby enabling passive current sharing, but digitally controlled buck converters exhibit large ripple due to their limit cycle behavior, have poor transient response, and consume significant quiescent current [2][3]. All these issues become even more challenging to address in high-Fsw converters because of more stringent loop-delay requirements.","PeriodicalId":188403,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC) Digest of Technical Papers","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC) Digest of Technical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCC.2015.7063003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Multi-phase switching DC-DC converters offer many advantages in terms of high output power, low ripple, fast load transient response, high efficiency across a very wide range of load currents, and alleviated output filter requirements. However, the need for complex controllers that ensure accurate regulation and uniform current sharing between phases along with generation of multiple matched pulse-width modulated (PWM) signals complicate the design of multi-phase converters. Hysteretic control offers the simplest means to implement multi-phase converters and has been widely used in the prior art [1]. However, its nonlinear behavior leads to large output ripple, unpredictable loop dynamics, and wide variation in switching frequency (Fsw), which are undesirable in many noise-sensitive applications. Furthermore, they require current sensors to implement active current sharing, and generation of multiple synchronized PWM signals requires power hungry circuits [1]. A voltage-mode controller using a type-Ill compensator is well-suited for low-noise applications but it requires multiple synchronized and matched ramp generators that also incur large area and power penalty. A digital PWM generator can provide accurately matched multi-phase PWM signals thereby enabling passive current sharing, but digitally controlled buck converters exhibit large ripple due to their limit cycle behavior, have poor transient response, and consume significant quiescent current [2][3]. All these issues become even more challenging to address in high-Fsw converters because of more stringent loop-delay requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
12.2 A1.8V 30 ~ 70mhz 87%峰值效率0.32mm2 4相时基降压变换器,65nm CMOS静态电流为3μA/MHz
多相开关DC-DC变换器在高输出功率,低纹波,快速负载瞬态响应,在非常宽的负载电流范围内的高效率以及减轻输出滤波器要求方面具有许多优点。然而,需要复杂的控制器来保证精确的调节和相间均匀的电流共享以及产生多个匹配的脉宽调制(PWM)信号,使多相变换器的设计复杂化。迟滞控制是实现多相变换器最简单的方法,在现有技术中得到了广泛的应用[1]。然而,它的非线性特性导致输出纹波大,不可预测的回路动力学,以及开关频率(Fsw)的大变化,这在许多噪声敏感的应用中是不希望的。此外,它们需要电流传感器实现有源电流共享,并且产生多个同步PWM信号需要耗电电路[1]。使用ii型补偿器的电压模式控制器非常适合低噪声应用,但它需要多个同步和匹配的斜坡发电机,这也会导致大面积和功率损失。数字PWM发生器可以提供精确匹配的多相PWM信号,从而实现无源电流共享,但数字控制降压变换器由于其极限环行为而产生大纹波,瞬态响应差,并且消耗大量静态电流[2][3]。由于更严格的环路延迟要求,所有这些问题在高fsw转换器中变得更具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
F2: Memory trends: From big data to wearable devices 13.6 A 600μW Bluetooth low-energy front-end receiver in 0.13μm CMOS technology 22.8 A 24-to-35Gb/s x4 VCSEL driver IC with multi-rate referenceless CDR in 0.13um SiGe BiCMOS 14.8 A 0.009mm2 2.06mW 32-to-2000MHz 2nd-order ΔΣ analogous bang-bang digital PLL with feed-forward delay-locked and phase-locked operations in 14nm FinFET technology 25.7 A 2.4GHz 4mW inductorless RF synthesizer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1