Short-term biochemical oxygen demand (BODst) estimation using an oxygen uptake rate measurement method

Piyarat Premanoch
{"title":"Short-term biochemical oxygen demand (BODst) estimation using an oxygen uptake rate measurement method","authors":"Piyarat Premanoch","doi":"10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research was to estimate short-term biochemical oxygen demand (BODst) using an oxygen uptake rate (OUR) measurement method. Activated sludge samples were taken from a return sludge pipe in an oxidation ditch at Maharaj Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. Sludge samples were filtered and aerated overnight in the preparing chamber until reaching the endogenous respiration phase, which provided the initial sludge concentration of 5,489 mg/L. Sludge sample concentrations were diluted to 880, 2,160, and 5,297 mg/L. Sodium acetate of 20 mg/mL (13 mg COD/mL) was used as a readily biodegradable COD substrate (rbCOD) and dosed to the sludge sample. Final COD concentration was varied into 4 dilutions; 7.21, 14.40, 28.71 and 57.70 mg/L. Temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen (DO) were controlled throughout the experiment at 28±0.5 °C, 7.8±0.1 and 6–7 mg/L, respectively. DO and OUR values were collected using an ultimate hybrid respirometer, which was developed by Saensing and Kanchanatawee [1]. The results showed that the linear relationship between BODst and COD substrate in all sludge dilutions were high and similar (R2 = 0.9891−0.9957). The area under the OUR curve can be used to easily estimate the BODst and linearly related with biodegradable organic substances. Average R2 throughout the experiment was 0.9940. The results were consistent with the studies of Gernaey et al. [2], Saensing and Kanchanatawee [1] and Premanoch [3] which had average R2 values of 0.9990, 0.9952 and 0.9964, respectively. Estimation of BODst from an OUR respirogram can provide rapid results and also give a linear relationship for the amount of organic matter concentration. It was apparent that the OUR measurement method using an ultimate hybrid respirometer was effective for determination of BODst with less chemical and time consumption.","PeriodicalId":127868,"journal":{"name":"2016 Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this research was to estimate short-term biochemical oxygen demand (BODst) using an oxygen uptake rate (OUR) measurement method. Activated sludge samples were taken from a return sludge pipe in an oxidation ditch at Maharaj Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. Sludge samples were filtered and aerated overnight in the preparing chamber until reaching the endogenous respiration phase, which provided the initial sludge concentration of 5,489 mg/L. Sludge sample concentrations were diluted to 880, 2,160, and 5,297 mg/L. Sodium acetate of 20 mg/mL (13 mg COD/mL) was used as a readily biodegradable COD substrate (rbCOD) and dosed to the sludge sample. Final COD concentration was varied into 4 dilutions; 7.21, 14.40, 28.71 and 57.70 mg/L. Temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen (DO) were controlled throughout the experiment at 28±0.5 °C, 7.8±0.1 and 6–7 mg/L, respectively. DO and OUR values were collected using an ultimate hybrid respirometer, which was developed by Saensing and Kanchanatawee [1]. The results showed that the linear relationship between BODst and COD substrate in all sludge dilutions were high and similar (R2 = 0.9891−0.9957). The area under the OUR curve can be used to easily estimate the BODst and linearly related with biodegradable organic substances. Average R2 throughout the experiment was 0.9940. The results were consistent with the studies of Gernaey et al. [2], Saensing and Kanchanatawee [1] and Premanoch [3] which had average R2 values of 0.9990, 0.9952 and 0.9964, respectively. Estimation of BODst from an OUR respirogram can provide rapid results and also give a linear relationship for the amount of organic matter concentration. It was apparent that the OUR measurement method using an ultimate hybrid respirometer was effective for determination of BODst with less chemical and time consumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用摄氧量测量方法估算短期生化需氧量(BODst)
本研究的目的是利用摄氧量(OUR)测量方法估计短期生化需氧量(BODst)。活性污泥样本取自泰国那空叻差玛省Maharaj医院氧化沟的回流污泥管。污泥样品在制备室中过滤曝气过夜,直至达到内生呼吸阶段,初始污泥浓度为5,489 mg/L。将污泥样品浓度稀释至880、2160和5297 mg/L。20 mg/mL (13 mg COD/mL)的乙酸钠作为易于生物降解的COD底物(rbCOD)并投加到污泥样品中。最终COD浓度变化为4种稀释度;7.21、14.40、28.71和57.70 mg/L。在整个实验过程中,温度、pH和溶解氧(DO)分别控制在28±0.5℃、7.8±0.1和6-7 mg/L。使用Saensing和Kanchanatawee开发的终极混合呼吸计收集DO和OUR值[1]。结果表明,各稀释污泥中BODst与COD底物呈高度线性关系(R2 = 0.9891 ~ 0.9957)。我们曲线下的面积可以很容易地估计出BODst,并且与生物可降解有机物呈线性相关。整个实验的平均R2为0.9940。结果与Gernaey等[2]、Saensing和Kanchanatawee[1]、Premanoch[3]的研究结果一致,平均R2分别为0.9990、0.9952和0.9964。从我们的呼吸程序中估计BODst可以提供快速的结果,也可以给出有机物浓度的线性关系。结果表明,采用极限混合式呼吸计的OUR测定法测定BODst是有效的,且化学试剂用量少,耗时短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Law for the promotion and protection of the right to education of students with disabilities in the university Defensive performance comparison of firewall systems Short-term biochemical oxygen demand (BODst) estimation using an oxygen uptake rate measurement method Rough-mutual feature selection based-on minimal-boundary and maximal-lower Comparative study of software clone detection techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1