Rough-mutual feature selection based-on minimal-boundary and maximal-lower

Sombut Foithong, P. Srinil, Kattiya T. Yangyuen, Thanawat Phattaraworamet
{"title":"Rough-mutual feature selection based-on minimal-boundary and maximal-lower","authors":"Sombut Foithong, P. Srinil, Kattiya T. Yangyuen, Thanawat Phattaraworamet","doi":"10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feature selection (FS) is an important preprocessing step for many applications in Data Mining. Most existing FS methods based on rough set theory focus on dependency function, which is based on lower approximation as for measuring the goodness of the feature subset. However, by determining only information from a positive region but neglecting a boundary region, mostly relevant information could be invisible. This paper, the minimal boundary region — maximal lower approximation (mBML) criterion, focuses on feature selection methods based on rough set and mutual information (MI) which use the different values among the lower approximation information and the information contained in the boundary region. The use of this criterion can result in higher predictive accuracy than those obtained using the measure based on the positive region alone. Experimental results are illustrated for crisp and real-valued data and compared with other FS methods in terms of subset size, runtime, and classification accuracy.","PeriodicalId":127868,"journal":{"name":"2016 Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feature selection (FS) is an important preprocessing step for many applications in Data Mining. Most existing FS methods based on rough set theory focus on dependency function, which is based on lower approximation as for measuring the goodness of the feature subset. However, by determining only information from a positive region but neglecting a boundary region, mostly relevant information could be invisible. This paper, the minimal boundary region — maximal lower approximation (mBML) criterion, focuses on feature selection methods based on rough set and mutual information (MI) which use the different values among the lower approximation information and the information contained in the boundary region. The use of this criterion can result in higher predictive accuracy than those obtained using the measure based on the positive region alone. Experimental results are illustrated for crisp and real-valued data and compared with other FS methods in terms of subset size, runtime, and classification accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于最小边界和最大下限的粗糙互特征选择
特征选择(FS)是数据挖掘中一个重要的预处理步骤。现有的基于粗糙集理论的FS方法大多集中在依赖函数上,基于下近似来衡量特征子集的优度。然而,如果只确定一个正区域的信息,而忽略边界区域,大多数相关信息可能是不可见的。本文以最小边界区域-最大下近似(mBML)准则为基础,重点研究了基于粗糙集和互信息(MI)的特征选择方法,该方法利用下近似信息与边界区域所含信息的不同值进行特征选择。该准则的使用比仅基于正区域的测量获得的预测精度更高。实验结果说明了清晰和实值数据,并在子集大小、运行时间和分类精度方面与其他FS方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Law for the promotion and protection of the right to education of students with disabilities in the university Defensive performance comparison of firewall systems Short-term biochemical oxygen demand (BODst) estimation using an oxygen uptake rate measurement method Rough-mutual feature selection based-on minimal-boundary and maximal-lower Comparative study of software clone detection techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1