Geothermal power plant system performance prediction using artificial neural networks

Dimas Ruliandi
{"title":"Geothermal power plant system performance prediction using artificial neural networks","authors":"Dimas Ruliandi","doi":"10.1109/SUSTECH.2015.7314349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an application of a feedforward backpropagation artificial neural network (ANN), to predict Geothermal Power Plant (GPP) Unit 4 Kamojang performance under a broad range of operating conditions. The ANN model was used for predicting specific steam consumption (SSC) of the plant, using 10 input parameters such as steam input parameters, turbine-generator parameters, condenser parameters, cooling tower parameters, and ambient parameters. The ANN model was trained with 2 different data combination. The first model was trained using commissioning data and after plant major overhaul data (ANN model 1) and the other model was trained only with after plant major overhaul data (ANN model 2). The predictive capability of the model was evaluated in terms of correlation coefficient (R), mean squared error (MSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the ANN model data prediction and plant real time data. The ANN model was tested using normal operation data taken during Feb-April 2015. During the testing stage, even though both ANN models performance yield moderate results, ANN model 2 shows a similar correlation (same positive or negative gradient) with the plant real time data. The difference between ANN model 2 SSC prediction and plant actual real time shows a significant difference. The experiment shows that there is 24 T/h of steam flow or equals to 3.4 to 4 MW (using SSC range 6-7 T/MWh) difference between venturi steam flow reading and ANN prediction. Combined with good and sufficient training data, and an independent measurement of steam flow for validation, the neural network approach can be utilized to develop a good performance program that able to identify the degradation of the plant or instruments (in this case is the steam flow instrument, venturi tube). If the data from the instrument reading show noticeable shift from ANN predicted value, then it can be a good sign to perform thorough analysis on the plant to prevent losses, especially in steam sales contract scheme.","PeriodicalId":147093,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SUSTECH.2015.7314349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper describes an application of a feedforward backpropagation artificial neural network (ANN), to predict Geothermal Power Plant (GPP) Unit 4 Kamojang performance under a broad range of operating conditions. The ANN model was used for predicting specific steam consumption (SSC) of the plant, using 10 input parameters such as steam input parameters, turbine-generator parameters, condenser parameters, cooling tower parameters, and ambient parameters. The ANN model was trained with 2 different data combination. The first model was trained using commissioning data and after plant major overhaul data (ANN model 1) and the other model was trained only with after plant major overhaul data (ANN model 2). The predictive capability of the model was evaluated in terms of correlation coefficient (R), mean squared error (MSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the ANN model data prediction and plant real time data. The ANN model was tested using normal operation data taken during Feb-April 2015. During the testing stage, even though both ANN models performance yield moderate results, ANN model 2 shows a similar correlation (same positive or negative gradient) with the plant real time data. The difference between ANN model 2 SSC prediction and plant actual real time shows a significant difference. The experiment shows that there is 24 T/h of steam flow or equals to 3.4 to 4 MW (using SSC range 6-7 T/MWh) difference between venturi steam flow reading and ANN prediction. Combined with good and sufficient training data, and an independent measurement of steam flow for validation, the neural network approach can be utilized to develop a good performance program that able to identify the degradation of the plant or instruments (in this case is the steam flow instrument, venturi tube). If the data from the instrument reading show noticeable shift from ANN predicted value, then it can be a good sign to perform thorough analysis on the plant to prevent losses, especially in steam sales contract scheme.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工神经网络的地热发电厂系统性能预测
本文介绍了一种前馈反向传播人工神经网络(ANN)在大范围工况下预测卡摩江地热发电厂(GPP) 4号机组运行性能的方法。采用人工神经网络模型,利用蒸汽输入参数、汽轮发电机参数、冷凝器参数、冷却塔参数和环境参数等10个输入参数,对电厂的比蒸汽耗量(SSC)进行预测。采用2种不同的数据组合对人工神经网络模型进行训练。第一个模型使用调试数据和工厂大修后数据(人工神经网络模型1)进行训练,另一个模型仅使用工厂大修后数据(人工神经网络模型2)进行训练。通过人工神经网络模型数据预测与工厂实时数据之间的相关系数(R)、均方误差(MSE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)来评估模型的预测能力。使用2015年2 - 4月的正常运行数据对人工神经网络模型进行检验。在测试阶段,尽管两种人工神经网络模型的性能都产生了中等的结果,但人工神经网络模型2与工厂实时数据显示出相似的相关性(相同的正或负梯度)。人工神经网络模型2的SSC预测值与植物实际实时值之间存在显著差异。实验表明,文丘里蒸汽流量读数与人工神经网络预测值的差异为24 T/h,即3.4 ~ 4 MW(采用SSC范围6 ~ 7 T/MWh)。结合良好和充分的训练数据,以及用于验证的独立蒸汽流量测量,神经网络方法可以用来开发一个良好的性能程序,能够识别设备或仪器的退化(在这种情况下是蒸汽流量仪器,文丘里管)。如果仪表读数的数据与人工神经网络的预测值有明显的变化,那么这可能是一个很好的迹象,可以对工厂进行彻底的分析,以防止损失,特别是在蒸汽销售合同方案中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Moore's law for mobile power Reduced order WECC modeling for frequency response and energy storage integration The conceptual models of energy behavior and energy behavioral change Geothermal power plant system performance prediction using artificial neural networks Development of unmanned aerial systems for use in precision agriculture: The AggieAir experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1