Nursing experiences of clinical governance implementation: a qualitative study

H. Sadeghi-Bazargani, J. Tabrizi, M. Saadati, R. Hassanzadeh, Gisoo Alizadeh
{"title":"Nursing experiences of clinical governance implementation: a qualitative study","authors":"H. Sadeghi-Bazargani, J. Tabrizi, M. Saadati, R. Hassanzadeh, Gisoo Alizadeh","doi":"10.1108/CGIJ-03-2015-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n– Clinical governance (CG) was used as a driver to improve safety and quality of healthcare. CG implementing is a change in health system and all the stakeholders must be participating. The purpose of this paper is to study nurses’ experience about CG movement in Tabriz hospitals. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n– A qualitative study using Focus Group Discussions (FGD) was done. Purposeful Sampling was used to select the objectives including 65 participants. Actually seven FGD’s were held. Content analysis was used to extract the meaningful themes. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n– It is revealed that nurses are the focal point in CG implementation in hospitals. Low commitment of managers and lack of physicians’ contribution was experienced by nurses. However, personnel education and development and patient safety have got more attention. Blame culture and increased work stress was reported as challenges. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n– CG as a change in healthcare system, especially in low- and middle-income countries, is faced by several challenges and its implementation would have different experiences. Nursing staff, the major group in hospitals, would be having interesting experiences through CG. Their practical opinions could guide the policy makers to employ proper plans to effectively implement CG. Considering the result of this study in practice would lead to improve CG implementation.","PeriodicalId":310544,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Governance: An International Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Governance: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CGIJ-03-2015-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose – Clinical governance (CG) was used as a driver to improve safety and quality of healthcare. CG implementing is a change in health system and all the stakeholders must be participating. The purpose of this paper is to study nurses’ experience about CG movement in Tabriz hospitals. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative study using Focus Group Discussions (FGD) was done. Purposeful Sampling was used to select the objectives including 65 participants. Actually seven FGD’s were held. Content analysis was used to extract the meaningful themes. Findings – It is revealed that nurses are the focal point in CG implementation in hospitals. Low commitment of managers and lack of physicians’ contribution was experienced by nurses. However, personnel education and development and patient safety have got more attention. Blame culture and increased work stress was reported as challenges. Originality/value – CG as a change in healthcare system, especially in low- and middle-income countries, is faced by several challenges and its implementation would have different experiences. Nursing staff, the major group in hospitals, would be having interesting experiences through CG. Their practical opinions could guide the policy makers to employ proper plans to effectively implement CG. Considering the result of this study in practice would lead to improve CG implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床治理实施的护理经验:质性研究
目的—临床治理(CG)被用作提高医疗保健安全性和质量的驱动因素。实施CG是卫生系统的变革,所有利益攸关方都必须参与。本文的目的是研究大不里士医院护士对CG运动的经验。设计/方法/方法-采用焦点小组讨论(FGD)进行定性研究。采用有目的的抽样方法选择目标,包括65名参与者。实际上举行了七次FGD。采用内容分析的方法提取有意义的主题。研究发现:护士是医院实施CG的重点。护士经历了管理者的低承诺和缺乏医生的贡献。然而,人才教育与发展和患者安全问题越来越受到重视。指责文化和不断增加的工作压力被认为是挑战。独创性/价值- CG作为医疗保健系统的变革,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,面临着若干挑战,其实施将有不同的经验。护理人员是医院的主要群体,他们将通过CG获得有趣的体验。他们的实际意见可以指导决策者采取适当的计划,有效地实施CG。在实践中考虑本研究的结果将有助于改进CG的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A clinical decisions unit improves emergency general surgery care delivery Clinical dashboards and their use in an adult mental health inpatient setting, a pilot study Nursing experiences of clinical governance implementation: a qualitative study Inadvertent returns to theatre within 30 days (IRT30) of surgery: An educational tool to monitor surgical complications and improve our performance as surgeons Patients versus healthcare providers’ perceptions of quality of care: Establishing the gaps for policy action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1