Inadvertent returns to theatre within 30 days (IRT30) of surgery: An educational tool to monitor surgical complications and improve our performance as surgeons

A. Sukha, E. Li, T. Sykes, A. Fox, A. Schofield, A. Houghton
{"title":"Inadvertent returns to theatre within 30 days (IRT30) of surgery: An educational tool to monitor surgical complications and improve our performance as surgeons","authors":"A. Sukha, E. Li, T. Sykes, A. Fox, A. Schofield, A. Houghton","doi":"10.1108/CGIJ-03-2015-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – When a patient unexpectedly has to go back to the operating theatre, there is often a perceived problem with the primary operation. An IRT30 is defined as any patient returning to the operating theatre within 30 days of the index procedure. IRT30 has been suggested to be a useful quality indicator of surgical standards and surgeon performance. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the usefulness of this validated tool, by assessing all IRT30 over a 12-month period. Learning points for individual surgeons, surgical subspecialty units and the clinical governance leads were reviewed. Design/methodology/approach – Consecutive series of general and vascular surgical patients undergoing elective and emergency procedures between July 2012 and 2013. Prospective data collection of all IRT30s classified as Types 1-5 by a single-rater and in-depth discussion of Types 3-5 cases at the clinical governance meetings. The individual case learning points were recorded and the collective data monitored monthly...","PeriodicalId":310544,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Governance: An International Journal","volume":"120 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Governance: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CGIJ-03-2015-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose – When a patient unexpectedly has to go back to the operating theatre, there is often a perceived problem with the primary operation. An IRT30 is defined as any patient returning to the operating theatre within 30 days of the index procedure. IRT30 has been suggested to be a useful quality indicator of surgical standards and surgeon performance. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the usefulness of this validated tool, by assessing all IRT30 over a 12-month period. Learning points for individual surgeons, surgical subspecialty units and the clinical governance leads were reviewed. Design/methodology/approach – Consecutive series of general and vascular surgical patients undergoing elective and emergency procedures between July 2012 and 2013. Prospective data collection of all IRT30s classified as Types 1-5 by a single-rater and in-depth discussion of Types 3-5 cases at the clinical governance meetings. The individual case learning points were recorded and the collective data monitored monthly...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术后30天内意外返回手术室(IRT30):监测手术并发症和提高我们作为外科医生的表现的教育工具
目的——当病人意外地不得不回到手术室时,通常会发现原发手术存在问题。IRT30定义为任何患者在指数手术后30天内返回手术室。IRT30被认为是外科手术标准和外科医生表现的一个有用的质量指标。本文的目的是通过评估12个月期间的所有IRT30来评估这种经过验证的工具的有用性。回顾了个体外科医生、外科亚专科单位和临床治理领导的学习要点。设计/方法/方法- 2012年7月至2013年7月期间接受选择性和紧急手术的连续系列普通和血管手术患者。通过在临床治理会议上对3-5型病例进行单一评估和深入讨论,收集所有1-5型irt30的前瞻性数据。记录个案学习点,每月监测集体数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A clinical decisions unit improves emergency general surgery care delivery Clinical dashboards and their use in an adult mental health inpatient setting, a pilot study Nursing experiences of clinical governance implementation: a qualitative study Inadvertent returns to theatre within 30 days (IRT30) of surgery: An educational tool to monitor surgical complications and improve our performance as surgeons Patients versus healthcare providers’ perceptions of quality of care: Establishing the gaps for policy action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1