Patients versus healthcare providers’ perceptions of quality of care: Establishing the gaps for policy action

A. Abuosi
{"title":"Patients versus healthcare providers’ perceptions of quality of care: Establishing the gaps for policy action","authors":"A. Abuosi","doi":"10.1108/CGIJ-03-2015-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n– The purpose of this paper is to find out whether there are any significant gaps in perceptions of quality of care between patients and healthcare providers in Ghana’s hospitals. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n– A cross-sectional survey of patients seeking outpatient consultations in 17 general hospitals in Ghana was conducted. A total of 818 patients and 152 hospital managers were interviewed. A 22-item quality of care scale was used in data collection. Data were analysed with the aid SPSS version 20. Summary statistics and t-test were used to analyse the data. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n– There was a significant difference in the overall perception of quality of care between patients and healthcare providers (Patients: M=89.11, SD=11.457; Providers: M=94.60, SD=10.922; t (845) −4.956, p < 001, two-tailed). Also, 18 items out of the 22-item quality of care scale showed significant difference between patients and providers. However, levels of quality of care is generally rated fairly favourably by both category of respondents. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n– Further study is required to explore the reasons for the perceived quality gaps between patients and healthcare providers. \n \n \n \n \nPractical implications \n \n \n \n– Management of hospitals need to evaluate patients’ perceptions of quality of care to inform measures aimed at improving quality of care, since what they may consider as good quality service may be rated less favourably by patients. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n– Comparing perceptions of quality between patients and healthcare providers is important in order adopt measures to address any differences in perceptions of quality between the two stakeholders. To the best of the author’s knowledge no study has been conducted in Ghana to that effect.","PeriodicalId":310544,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Governance: An International Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Governance: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CGIJ-03-2015-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to find out whether there are any significant gaps in perceptions of quality of care between patients and healthcare providers in Ghana’s hospitals. Design/methodology/approach – A cross-sectional survey of patients seeking outpatient consultations in 17 general hospitals in Ghana was conducted. A total of 818 patients and 152 hospital managers were interviewed. A 22-item quality of care scale was used in data collection. Data were analysed with the aid SPSS version 20. Summary statistics and t-test were used to analyse the data. Findings – There was a significant difference in the overall perception of quality of care between patients and healthcare providers (Patients: M=89.11, SD=11.457; Providers: M=94.60, SD=10.922; t (845) −4.956, p < 001, two-tailed). Also, 18 items out of the 22-item quality of care scale showed significant difference between patients and providers. However, levels of quality of care is generally rated fairly favourably by both category of respondents. Research limitations/implications – Further study is required to explore the reasons for the perceived quality gaps between patients and healthcare providers. Practical implications – Management of hospitals need to evaluate patients’ perceptions of quality of care to inform measures aimed at improving quality of care, since what they may consider as good quality service may be rated less favourably by patients. Originality/value – Comparing perceptions of quality between patients and healthcare providers is important in order adopt measures to address any differences in perceptions of quality between the two stakeholders. To the best of the author’s knowledge no study has been conducted in Ghana to that effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者与医疗保健提供者对护理质量的看法:建立政策行动的差距
目的-本文的目的是找出是否有任何显著的差距在加纳的医院的病人和医疗服务提供者之间的护理质量的看法。设计/方法/方法——对在加纳17家综合医院寻求门诊会诊的患者进行了横断面调查。共采访了818名患者和152名医院管理人员。数据收集采用22项护理质量量表。数据分析采用SPSS version 20辅助软件。采用汇总统计和t检验对数据进行分析。研究结果-患者和医疗保健提供者对护理质量的总体感知存在显著差异(患者:M=89.11, SD=11.457;供应商:M=94.60, SD=10.922;T (845) - 4.956, p < 001,双尾)。在22个项目的护理质量量表中,有18个项目在患者和提供者之间存在显著差异。然而,两类答复者对护理质量水平的评价一般都相当有利。研究局限性/影响-需要进一步研究以探索患者和医疗保健提供者之间感知到的质量差距的原因。实际影响——医院管理层需要评估患者对护理质量的看法,以便为旨在提高护理质量的措施提供信息,因为他们可能认为优质的服务可能不太受患者的好评。独创性/价值——比较患者和医疗保健提供者对质量的看法非常重要,以便采取措施解决两个利益相关者对质量看法的任何差异。据作者所知,在加纳没有进行过这方面的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A clinical decisions unit improves emergency general surgery care delivery Clinical dashboards and their use in an adult mental health inpatient setting, a pilot study Nursing experiences of clinical governance implementation: a qualitative study Inadvertent returns to theatre within 30 days (IRT30) of surgery: An educational tool to monitor surgical complications and improve our performance as surgeons Patients versus healthcare providers’ perceptions of quality of care: Establishing the gaps for policy action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1