SIGNIFICANCE OF MORPHOPHONOLOGICAL ELEMENTS IN THE PROCESS OF WORD FORMATION

S. Im
{"title":"SIGNIFICANCE OF MORPHOPHONOLOGICAL ELEMENTS IN THE PROCESS OF WORD FORMATION","authors":"S. Im","doi":"10.36078/987654417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the role of morphophonological elements such as stress, alternation of phonemes in the choice of suffixes in the deminutative word formation, and the nature of the relationship between them. It is traditionally believed that Russian word formation is agglutinative, since the affix dominates, and the stress and alternation of phonemes are subordinate to it. The Russian language is fusional in the typological characteristics, as fusional characteristics that manifest themselves in alternation of phonemes, alternation of stress, declension, conjugation and derivation, define the typological features of the Russian language. Therefore, the article suggest that Russian word formation is also fusional. Fusion is expressed in the fact that the morphological characteristics of the deriving word predict the choice of suffixes, which are variants within the same paradigm of allomorphs of the word-forming affix. \nThe research showed that stress, phoneme alternation and suffix are functionally equal, since suffix can also specify the stress and the alternant of the derived word. Consequently, the alternation of allomorphs of suffixes, as well as alternations in a word stem, including the rules for choosing allomorphs, is not an object of word-formation analysis, but relate to morphophonology. Thus, the hypothesis of functional equivalence of stress, phoneme alternation, and affix alternation is confirmed in the description of word formation of masculine diminutives with suffixes -ик, -ок (-ек), -ушек (-юшк, -ишек), -анёк (-енёк), as shown in the suffix allomorph selection table.","PeriodicalId":161777,"journal":{"name":"Philology matters","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36078/987654417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the role of morphophonological elements such as stress, alternation of phonemes in the choice of suffixes in the deminutative word formation, and the nature of the relationship between them. It is traditionally believed that Russian word formation is agglutinative, since the affix dominates, and the stress and alternation of phonemes are subordinate to it. The Russian language is fusional in the typological characteristics, as fusional characteristics that manifest themselves in alternation of phonemes, alternation of stress, declension, conjugation and derivation, define the typological features of the Russian language. Therefore, the article suggest that Russian word formation is also fusional. Fusion is expressed in the fact that the morphological characteristics of the deriving word predict the choice of suffixes, which are variants within the same paradigm of allomorphs of the word-forming affix. The research showed that stress, phoneme alternation and suffix are functionally equal, since suffix can also specify the stress and the alternant of the derived word. Consequently, the alternation of allomorphs of suffixes, as well as alternations in a word stem, including the rules for choosing allomorphs, is not an object of word-formation analysis, but relate to morphophonology. Thus, the hypothesis of functional equivalence of stress, phoneme alternation, and affix alternation is confirmed in the description of word formation of masculine diminutives with suffixes -ик, -ок (-ек), -ушек (-юшк, -ишек), -анёк (-енёк), as shown in the suffix allomorph selection table.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
词形音素在构词过程中的意义
本文探讨了重音、音位变化等音素因素在消音构词法中后缀选择中的作用,以及它们之间关系的本质。传统上认为俄语的构词法是粘合的,因为词缀占主导地位,重音和音素的变化从属于它。俄语在类型学特征上具有融合性,音素的变化、重音的变化、变音的变化、共轭的变化、派生的变化等特征的融合性决定了俄语的类型学特征。因此,本文认为俄语构词法也是融合构词法。融合表现在派生词的形态特征预测后缀的选择这一事实中,这些后缀是构词词缀同种异体范式中的变体。研究表明,重音、音素交替和后缀在功能上是相等的,因为后缀也可以指定派生词的重音和交替。因此,词干中词缀异构体的变化,包括选择异构体的规则,不是构词分析的对象,而是与词形音素有关。因此,在后缀为-ик、-о з (- о з)、-ушек (-юшк、-ишек)、-анёк (-енёк)的阳性小词构词描述中,重音、音位交替和词缀交替的功能对等假说得到了证实,如后缀异形体选择表所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FORS VA DARIY TILLARIDA OTLARDA SON KATEGORIYASI EY UNDOVI MUROJAAT OBYEKTI SIFATIDA TRANSLATION PROBLEMS AND THEIR SOLUTIONS STAGES OF LEGAL DISCOURSE DEVELOPMENT IN LINGUISTICS COMPARATIVE-TYPOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STATUS OF SIMPLE AND COMPLEX SENTENCES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1