The guilt that guides me: religiosity, sex guilt, and the demonization of sex workers.

Jana M. Hackathorn, J. Hodges, Steffon Jones, Shahzor Hashim
{"title":"The guilt that guides me: religiosity, sex guilt, and the demonization of sex workers.","authors":"Jana M. Hackathorn, J. Hodges, Steffon Jones, Shahzor Hashim","doi":"10.1080/00224545.2022.2080037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Religiosity and sex-related attitudes are often correlated, and on occasion negatively. That is, as religiosity increases, sexual attitudes tend to become more conservative or generally more disapproving in valence. Recent research suggests that one's own sex guilt may be the mediating influence in this relationship. A series of two studies sought to extend that research and examine the extent to which an individual's religiosity and sex guilt influences their perspective of pornography and sex workers. A survey containing relevant measures was distributed to undergraduate participants as well as individuals from Amazon.com's MTurk. Results indicate that individuals high in religiosity have more negative views of pornography in general, and more demonizing views toward sex workers. However, it was their own sex guilt that mediated that relationship. This study replicates and adds to our current understanding of how religiosity and disparaging views of sex are related, but also shows the importance of including sex guilt as an influential individual difference.","PeriodicalId":280808,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social psychology","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2022.2080037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Religiosity and sex-related attitudes are often correlated, and on occasion negatively. That is, as religiosity increases, sexual attitudes tend to become more conservative or generally more disapproving in valence. Recent research suggests that one's own sex guilt may be the mediating influence in this relationship. A series of two studies sought to extend that research and examine the extent to which an individual's religiosity and sex guilt influences their perspective of pornography and sex workers. A survey containing relevant measures was distributed to undergraduate participants as well as individuals from Amazon.com's MTurk. Results indicate that individuals high in religiosity have more negative views of pornography in general, and more demonizing views toward sex workers. However, it was their own sex guilt that mediated that relationship. This study replicates and adds to our current understanding of how religiosity and disparaging views of sex are related, but also shows the importance of including sex guilt as an influential individual difference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引导我的内疚感:宗教信仰、性内疚感和对性工作者的妖魔化。
宗教信仰和与性有关的态度通常是相关的,有时是负相关的。也就是说,随着宗教信仰的增加,性态度往往变得更加保守,或者在价上更不赞成。最近的研究表明,一个人自己的性内疚感可能是这种关系的中介影响。一系列的两项研究试图扩展这项研究,并检查个人的宗教信仰和性内疚在多大程度上影响他们对色情作品和性工作者的看法。一份包含相关措施的调查被分发给本科生参与者以及来自亚马逊网站MTurk的个人。结果表明,宗教虔诚度高的个体对色情作品总体上有更多的负面看法,对性工作者有更多的妖魔化看法。然而,是她们自己的性内疚感调解了这种关系。这项研究重复并增加了我们目前对宗教信仰和贬低性观念之间关系的理解,但也显示了将性内疚作为一种有影响的个体差异的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychological effects of reading: the role of nostalgia in re-reading favorite books. Does he see what she sees? The gender gap in perceptions of institutional sexism. When and how to share? The role of inspiration. Emotional experiences of ghosting. Effects of explanations and precise anchors on salary offers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1