Does he see what she sees? The gender gap in perceptions of institutional sexism.

S. Simon, Melanie Soilleux, C. Wyland, Laurie T. O’Brien
{"title":"Does he see what she sees? The gender gap in perceptions of institutional sexism.","authors":"S. Simon, Melanie Soilleux, C. Wyland, Laurie T. O’Brien","doi":"10.1080/00224545.2022.2085543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women are more likely than men to perceive institutional sexism. In the present study, we examined the gender gap in perceptions of a legal case in which a female plaintiff claims she was a victim of institutional gender discrimination by an employer. Participants were randomly assigned to receive information about institutional forms of sexism (or not) prior to learning the facts of the case. In addition, participants were randomly assigned to take the female plaintiff's perspective (or remain objective) while reviewing the case. In isolation, sexism awareness and perspective-taking both independently eliminated the gender gap in perceptions of discrimination. However, contrary to expectations, the gender gap reemerged among participants who were made aware of sexism prior to perspective-taking such that women perceived more discrimination than men. Implications for interventions to increase perceptions of institutional sexism are discussed.","PeriodicalId":280808,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social psychology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2022.2085543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women are more likely than men to perceive institutional sexism. In the present study, we examined the gender gap in perceptions of a legal case in which a female plaintiff claims she was a victim of institutional gender discrimination by an employer. Participants were randomly assigned to receive information about institutional forms of sexism (or not) prior to learning the facts of the case. In addition, participants were randomly assigned to take the female plaintiff's perspective (or remain objective) while reviewing the case. In isolation, sexism awareness and perspective-taking both independently eliminated the gender gap in perceptions of discrimination. However, contrary to expectations, the gender gap reemerged among participants who were made aware of sexism prior to perspective-taking such that women perceived more discrimination than men. Implications for interventions to increase perceptions of institutional sexism are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他看到了她看到的吗?制度性性别歧视观念中的性别差异。
女性比男性更容易感受到制度性的性别歧视。在本研究中,我们研究了在一个法律案件中,女性原告声称她是雇主制度性性别歧视的受害者,在认知上的性别差异。在了解案件真相之前,参与者被随机分配接收有关(或不)性别歧视制度形式的信息。此外,参与者被随机分配站在女性原告的角度(或保持客观)来审查案件。孤立地说,性别歧视意识和换位思考都独立地消除了在歧视观念方面的性别差距。然而,与预期相反,在接受观点之前就意识到性别歧视的参与者中,性别差距再次出现,女性比男性更容易感受到歧视。讨论了增加对机构性别歧视的认识的干预措施的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Flaw detection in concrete using the impact-echo method
IF 4.2 2区 材料科学Ndt & E InternationalPub Date : 1991-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/0963-8695(91)90397-L
Laboratory and field studies of the impact-echo method for flaw detection in concrete
IF 4.2 2区 材料科学Ndt & E InternationalPub Date : 1991-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/0963-8695(91)90456-D
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychological effects of reading: the role of nostalgia in re-reading favorite books. Does he see what she sees? The gender gap in perceptions of institutional sexism. When and how to share? The role of inspiration. Emotional experiences of ghosting. Effects of explanations and precise anchors on salary offers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1