Effects of explanations and precise anchors on salary offers.

T. Thorsteinson, Mable E Clark
{"title":"Effects of explanations and precise anchors on salary offers.","authors":"T. Thorsteinson, Mable E Clark","doi":"10.1080/00224545.2022.2081527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two studies were conducted which examined explanations and precise anchors on counteroffers and perceptions in a salary negotiation. Study 1 found that precise offers reduced counteroffers compared to round offers, but explanations focused on internal equity concerns or external equity concerns had no effect on counteroffers. Study 2 also found that precise offers reduced counteroffers compared to round offers. Explanations, which were manipulated to focus on constraint or disparagement rationales, failed to affect counteroffers, but a constraint explanation led to higher attributions of competence compared to a disparagement explanation or no explanation. These results suggest that precise offers are an effective tactic for reducing counteroffers and that explanations are relatively unimportant. Further research is needed to determine under what conditions an explanation may improve or harm negotiation outcomes.","PeriodicalId":280808,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social psychology","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2022.2081527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two studies were conducted which examined explanations and precise anchors on counteroffers and perceptions in a salary negotiation. Study 1 found that precise offers reduced counteroffers compared to round offers, but explanations focused on internal equity concerns or external equity concerns had no effect on counteroffers. Study 2 also found that precise offers reduced counteroffers compared to round offers. Explanations, which were manipulated to focus on constraint or disparagement rationales, failed to affect counteroffers, but a constraint explanation led to higher attributions of competence compared to a disparagement explanation or no explanation. These results suggest that precise offers are an effective tactic for reducing counteroffers and that explanations are relatively unimportant. Further research is needed to determine under what conditions an explanation may improve or harm negotiation outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释和精确锚定对薪酬提供的影响。
研究人员进行了两项研究,对薪资谈判中的还价和看法进行了解释和精确定位。研究1发现,与整数报价相比,精确报价减少了还价,但专注于内部公平问题或外部公平问题的解释对还价没有影响。研究2还发现,与整数报价相比,精确报价减少了还价。解释被操纵成专注于约束或贬低的理由,对还价没有影响,但与贬低解释或不解释相比,约束解释导致更高的能力归因。这些结果表明,精确的报价是减少还价的有效策略,而解释相对不重要。需要进一步的研究来确定在什么条件下解释可能改善或损害谈判结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Flaw detection in concrete using the impact-echo method
IF 4.2 2区 材料科学Ndt & E InternationalPub Date : 1991-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/0963-8695(91)90397-L
Laboratory and field studies of the impact-echo method for flaw detection in concrete
IF 4.2 2区 材料科学Ndt & E InternationalPub Date : 1991-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/0963-8695(91)90456-D
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychological effects of reading: the role of nostalgia in re-reading favorite books. Does he see what she sees? The gender gap in perceptions of institutional sexism. When and how to share? The role of inspiration. Emotional experiences of ghosting. Effects of explanations and precise anchors on salary offers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1