Naman Gupta, P. Goyal, Kavindra Kandpal, K. R. Teja
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Pulse Triggered Flipflops","authors":"Naman Gupta, P. Goyal, Kavindra Kandpal, K. R. Teja","doi":"10.1109/ICDCSYST.2018.8605145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we have compared and analyzed two architectures of implicit pulsed triggered flip-flop (P-FF). The Predictive Technology Model (PTM) 45nm and 32nm technology nodes are used for simulations. The variation in delay and power for both architectures with respect to variation in supply voltage (VDD) and temperature is analyzed. Results from simulations at 45nm show that design with conditional pulse-enhancement technique (CPE) is better in terms of power consumption whereas design using gated-pull up control (GPC) is less prone to temperature and supply voltage variation. Similar trends have been noticed at a 32nm technology node.","PeriodicalId":175583,"journal":{"name":"2018 4th International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICDCS)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 4th International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICDCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCSYST.2018.8605145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we have compared and analyzed two architectures of implicit pulsed triggered flip-flop (P-FF). The Predictive Technology Model (PTM) 45nm and 32nm technology nodes are used for simulations. The variation in delay and power for both architectures with respect to variation in supply voltage (VDD) and temperature is analyzed. Results from simulations at 45nm show that design with conditional pulse-enhancement technique (CPE) is better in terms of power consumption whereas design using gated-pull up control (GPC) is less prone to temperature and supply voltage variation. Similar trends have been noticed at a 32nm technology node.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
