Design Anthropology and the next evolution of the design process

Nishanth Srikanth
{"title":"Design Anthropology and the next evolution of the design process","authors":"Nishanth Srikanth","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As design theory and practice evolve, understanding the impacts that a designer’s choices will have on the larger community are more important than ever. While designers have always sought to shape the world around us, and (for the most part) serve as a positive force in improving people’s lives, designers today are reckoning with the unintended and unforeseen consequences of poor decision making, and the poor understanding of culture of past designers. Looking into various definitions of design, past movements that sought to alter the design process, and their effectiveness and criticisms, we can start to understand the need for a new form kind of design practice.The biggest issue has been a lack of understanding of local cultures, and especially of value systems, as part of the design process. This has led to designers working off of perceptions of what people value, rather than understanding those value systems before intervening. Here, the relatively new field of design anthropology holds promise, as it provides a new approach to design; one that does not look to create for a universal ideal, but instead infuses design with the perspective of multiplicity.This paper explores the evolution of Design Anthropology, dissects the similarities and differences between design and anthropology, and looks at ways in which this new field can influence traditional design processes and practices. The goal is to create design process that seeks to understand and empathize with the culture and value systems of a community, rather than just disrupt or supersede them.","PeriodicalId":308830,"journal":{"name":"Human Dynamics and Design for the Development of Contemporary Societies","volume":"340 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Dynamics and Design for the Development of Contemporary Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As design theory and practice evolve, understanding the impacts that a designer’s choices will have on the larger community are more important than ever. While designers have always sought to shape the world around us, and (for the most part) serve as a positive force in improving people’s lives, designers today are reckoning with the unintended and unforeseen consequences of poor decision making, and the poor understanding of culture of past designers. Looking into various definitions of design, past movements that sought to alter the design process, and their effectiveness and criticisms, we can start to understand the need for a new form kind of design practice.The biggest issue has been a lack of understanding of local cultures, and especially of value systems, as part of the design process. This has led to designers working off of perceptions of what people value, rather than understanding those value systems before intervening. Here, the relatively new field of design anthropology holds promise, as it provides a new approach to design; one that does not look to create for a universal ideal, but instead infuses design with the perspective of multiplicity.This paper explores the evolution of Design Anthropology, dissects the similarities and differences between design and anthropology, and looks at ways in which this new field can influence traditional design processes and practices. The goal is to create design process that seeks to understand and empathize with the culture and value systems of a community, rather than just disrupt or supersede them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计人类学和设计过程的下一个演变
随着设计理论和实践的发展,理解设计师的选择对更大社区的影响比以往任何时候都更加重要。虽然设计师们一直试图塑造我们周围的世界,并且(在大多数情况下)作为改善人们生活的积极力量,但今天的设计师们正在考虑糟糕的决策所带来的意想不到的和不可预见的后果,以及过去设计师对文化的不理解。回顾设计的各种定义,过去试图改变设计过程的运动,以及它们的有效性和批评,我们可以开始理解对一种新形式的设计实践的需求。最大的问题是缺乏对当地文化的理解,尤其是对价值体系的理解,这是设计过程的一部分。这导致设计师根据人们对价值的认知而工作,而不是在干预之前理解这些价值系统。在这里,相对较新的设计人类学领域充满希望,因为它提供了一种新的设计方法;它不寻求为一个普遍的理想而创造,而是为设计注入多样性的视角。本文探讨了设计人类学的演变,剖析了设计与人类学之间的异同,并探讨了这个新领域如何影响传统的设计过程和实践。我们的目标是创建一个旨在理解和同情社区文化和价值体系的设计过程,而不仅仅是破坏或取代它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Slipper Palace. Creative Entrepreneurship for the Common Good [de]Territorialization, the Role of our Brain in a Technological World. Biomateriality Bridging Design and the Community Overcrowded Ecologies: Designing Value through More-than-Human Factors Cohort Study Good Practices: Design Communication and Capacitation Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1