“No More Being Stuck” in Reading Literature: Effects of Reader Response Journal Project on EFL Teacher Trainees’ Literacy Engagement

Iskhak, J. Mujiyanto, Rudi Hartono
{"title":"“No More Being Stuck” in Reading Literature: Effects of Reader Response Journal Project on EFL Teacher Trainees’ Literacy Engagement","authors":"Iskhak, J. Mujiyanto, Rudi Hartono","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200620.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"--The study aims to explore the application of reader response journals to help EFL readers get out from the ‘being stuck condition’ in interpreting literary works. Underpinned by the interplay of Reader Response Theory, Socio-constructivism, and Critical Pedagogy, the study promotes EFL readers’ aesthetic stances to have their own ‘convenient rooms’ to (re)create meaning in transacting with texts as illuminated by their schemata and life experiences, which is contrast to New Critics’ views that promote text-based analysis only. An intact group of EFL teacher trainees of an Indonesian private teacher college taking literary criticism participated in this program evaluation-based case study to uncover the observed classroom dynamics representing the trainees’ reading and enjoying literary works, and responding to assigned literary works by means of response journals. In applying the one-semester course program, the trainees were triggered to individually and collaboratively share ideas, feelings, wants, interests, and expectations, and peer-feedback their written responses as reflected in on-going revised journals. The peer-led discussions characterized the classroom interaction driven by the teacher’s (tutor’s) guiding steps, as the scaffolding techniques. The study showed the nonthreatening classroom interaction and the trainees’ development of using varied critical and personal reader response strategies. The trainees’ captured ‘voices’ as reflected in peer-led discussions and their journals represented their freedom in expressing ideas, and enjoyment in reading-writing (literacy) events. The study suggests further studies investigate e-journaling project that entails possibilities of enhancing trainees’ multiliteracies.","PeriodicalId":428575,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

--The study aims to explore the application of reader response journals to help EFL readers get out from the ‘being stuck condition’ in interpreting literary works. Underpinned by the interplay of Reader Response Theory, Socio-constructivism, and Critical Pedagogy, the study promotes EFL readers’ aesthetic stances to have their own ‘convenient rooms’ to (re)create meaning in transacting with texts as illuminated by their schemata and life experiences, which is contrast to New Critics’ views that promote text-based analysis only. An intact group of EFL teacher trainees of an Indonesian private teacher college taking literary criticism participated in this program evaluation-based case study to uncover the observed classroom dynamics representing the trainees’ reading and enjoying literary works, and responding to assigned literary works by means of response journals. In applying the one-semester course program, the trainees were triggered to individually and collaboratively share ideas, feelings, wants, interests, and expectations, and peer-feedback their written responses as reflected in on-going revised journals. The peer-led discussions characterized the classroom interaction driven by the teacher’s (tutor’s) guiding steps, as the scaffolding techniques. The study showed the nonthreatening classroom interaction and the trainees’ development of using varied critical and personal reader response strategies. The trainees’ captured ‘voices’ as reflected in peer-led discussions and their journals represented their freedom in expressing ideas, and enjoyment in reading-writing (literacy) events. The study suggests further studies investigate e-journaling project that entails possibilities of enhancing trainees’ multiliteracies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读文献中的“不再被困”:读者反应期刊项目对英语教师培训生读写参与的影响
——本研究旨在探讨读者反应日志的应用,以帮助英语读者摆脱文学作品解读中的“被困状态”。在读者反应理论、社会建构主义和批判教育学的相互作用的基础上,该研究促进了英语读者的审美立场,使他们有自己的“方便空间”,在与文本的交易中(重新)创造意义,这是由他们的图式和生活经验所照亮的,这与新评论家只促进基于文本的分析的观点形成对比。一组完整的印度尼西亚私立师范学院的英语教师学员参加了这项基于项目评估的案例研究,以揭示观察到的课堂动态,代表学员阅读和享受文学作品,并通过反应日志对指定的文学作品做出反应。在这个为期一个学期的课程中,学员们被要求以个人和合作的方式分享想法、感受、需求、兴趣和期望,并在不断修订的期刊中对他们的书面反应进行同行反馈。同伴主导的讨论以教师(导师)的指导步骤驱动的课堂互动为特征,称为脚手架技术。研究显示了无威胁的课堂互动和学员使用各种批判性和个人读者回应策略的发展。学员们在同行领导的讨论和他们的日记中所捕捉到的“声音”代表了他们表达思想的自由,以及他们在读写活动中的享受。该研究建议进一步研究电子日志项目,以提高受训者的多元文化能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptation of Academic Psychological Capital Questionnaire in Bahasa Indonesia Improving Theological Seminary Human Resources’ Quality Mind-Set in Disruption Era Website Rumahbahasa.id as a Basis for Development of Scientific Work Teaching Materials in Universitas Negeri Semarang The Concept of Women’s Happiness in Serat Wulang Putri Community Social Behavior in Preventing Tuberculosis in the City of Semarang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1