Wer schützt wen? Hachimanismus, Buddhismus und Tennōismus im Altertum

B. Scheid
{"title":"Wer schützt wen? Hachimanismus, Buddhismus und Tennōismus im Altertum","authors":"B. Scheid","doi":"10.1515/asia-2014-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cult of Hachiman or “Hachimanism” is discussed from its inception as a national cult (mid-eighth century) to its firm establishment in the ninth century. Hachimanism was initially part of the politico-religious program of Emperor Shōmu and his daughter Abe, the “last empress”. Their kind of state Buddhism implied a combination of Buddhist ritualism based on the Golden Light Sutra and other state protecting Buddhist texts as well as non-Buddhist ancestor worship. Hachiman functioned according to both systems, since he was both a protector of Buddhism and an imperial ancestral deity. After what I call a Hachiman boom from about 750 to 770, the famous Dōkyō incident (769) must have led to a fundamental doubt in the validity of Hachiman’s oracles and therefore to a crisis for Hachimanism. However, in the early Heian period, innovative monks such as Kūkai, Saichō, and Gyōkyō re-established Hachimanism to strengthen their ties to the imperial court. In order to obtain protection by the state they redefined the cult of Hachiman as an explicitly Buddhist state protector. Bernhard Scheid: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. E-mail: Bernhard.Scheid@oeaw.ac.at","PeriodicalId":286658,"journal":{"name":"Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/asia-2014-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The cult of Hachiman or “Hachimanism” is discussed from its inception as a national cult (mid-eighth century) to its firm establishment in the ninth century. Hachimanism was initially part of the politico-religious program of Emperor Shōmu and his daughter Abe, the “last empress”. Their kind of state Buddhism implied a combination of Buddhist ritualism based on the Golden Light Sutra and other state protecting Buddhist texts as well as non-Buddhist ancestor worship. Hachiman functioned according to both systems, since he was both a protector of Buddhism and an imperial ancestral deity. After what I call a Hachiman boom from about 750 to 770, the famous Dōkyō incident (769) must have led to a fundamental doubt in the validity of Hachiman’s oracles and therefore to a crisis for Hachimanism. However, in the early Heian period, innovative monks such as Kūkai, Saichō, and Gyōkyō re-established Hachimanism to strengthen their ties to the imperial court. In order to obtain protection by the state they redefined the cult of Hachiman as an explicitly Buddhist state protector. Bernhard Scheid: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. E-mail: Bernhard.Scheid@oeaw.ac.at
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁保护谁?古代Hachimanismus、佛教和Tennō主义
对八幡曼的崇拜或“八幡曼主义”从一开始作为国家崇拜(八世纪中叶)到九世纪确立。八重主义最初是天皇Shōmu和他的女儿安倍(“最后的皇后”)政治-宗教计划的一部分。他们的国家佛教意味着以金光经为基础的佛教仪式和其他国家保护佛教典籍以及非佛教祖先崇拜的结合。八幡既是佛教的保护神,又是皇祖神,因此他的功能与这两种体系都一致。在我所说的从750年到770年的哈奇曼繁荣之后,著名的Dōkyō事件(769)一定导致了对哈奇曼预言的有效性的根本性怀疑,从而导致了哈奇曼主义的危机。然而,在平安时代早期,Kūkai、赛一、Gyōkyō等创新僧人为了加强与朝廷的联系,重新建立了八幡主义。为了获得国家的保护,他们将八幡曼的崇拜重新定义为一个明确的佛教国家保护者。伯恩哈德·沙伊德:Österreichische科学学院。电子邮件:Bernhard.Scheid@oeaw.ac.at
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
„Wissen‟ und „glauben‟ als Gegensatzpaar im politischen Diskurs Japans zwischen 1812 und 1911 Rezensionen – Comptes rendus – Reviews Anzan Kigan. Rituelle Geburtspraktiken Japans im Wandel der Zeit Wer schützt wen? Hachimanismus, Buddhismus und Tennōismus im Altertum What is “rhetoric” anyway? Briared in words in Early China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1