Demystifying Unexpected Silicon Responses through User-Defined Fault Models (UDFM) and Failure Analysis

Subhadip Kundu, Gaurav Bhargava, L. Endrinal, Lavakumar Ranganathan
{"title":"Demystifying Unexpected Silicon Responses through User-Defined Fault Models (UDFM) and Failure Analysis","authors":"Subhadip Kundu, Gaurav Bhargava, L. Endrinal, Lavakumar Ranganathan","doi":"10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2021p0369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Failure Analysis (FA) plays an important role during silicon development and yield ramp up, helping identify critical test, design marginality and process issues in a timely and efficient manner. FA techniques typically rely on diagnosis callouts as a starting point for debug. Diagnostic algorithms rely on the error logs collected on production patterns which are generated to detect Stuck-at Faults (SAF) and Transition Delay Faults (TDF). Typically, SAF patterns screen out the static defects and TDF patterns test for transient fails. But often, we see cases where a SAF pattern shmoo is clean but the TDF pattern shmoo is a gross failure indicating a cell-internal static defect missed by the traditional SAF patterns. In this work, we will present our own developed User-Defined Fault Model, which targets cell-internal faults to explain unexpected silicon observations. An added advantage of the work can be seen in improving diagnosis results on the error logs collected using these targeted UDFM patterns. Since UDFM utilizes targeted fault excitation, the diagnosis algorithm results in better callouts. In this paper, we will also propose a custom diagnosis flow using our in-house UDFM to achieve better resolution. Three FA case studies will be presented to showcase the usefulness and effectivity of the proposed methods.","PeriodicalId":188323,"journal":{"name":"ISTFA 2021: Conference Proceedings from the 47th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISTFA 2021: Conference Proceedings from the 47th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2021p0369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Failure Analysis (FA) plays an important role during silicon development and yield ramp up, helping identify critical test, design marginality and process issues in a timely and efficient manner. FA techniques typically rely on diagnosis callouts as a starting point for debug. Diagnostic algorithms rely on the error logs collected on production patterns which are generated to detect Stuck-at Faults (SAF) and Transition Delay Faults (TDF). Typically, SAF patterns screen out the static defects and TDF patterns test for transient fails. But often, we see cases where a SAF pattern shmoo is clean but the TDF pattern shmoo is a gross failure indicating a cell-internal static defect missed by the traditional SAF patterns. In this work, we will present our own developed User-Defined Fault Model, which targets cell-internal faults to explain unexpected silicon observations. An added advantage of the work can be seen in improving diagnosis results on the error logs collected using these targeted UDFM patterns. Since UDFM utilizes targeted fault excitation, the diagnosis algorithm results in better callouts. In this paper, we will also propose a custom diagnosis flow using our in-house UDFM to achieve better resolution. Three FA case studies will be presented to showcase the usefulness and effectivity of the proposed methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过用户自定义故障模型(UDFM)和故障分析揭开意外硅响应的神秘面纱
失效分析(FA)在硅开发和良率提升过程中发挥着重要作用,有助于及时有效地识别关键测试、设计边际和工艺问题。FA技术通常依赖于诊断标注作为调试的起点。诊断算法依赖于从生产模式中收集的错误日志,生成这些日志以检测卡滞故障(SAF)和转换延迟故障(TDF)。典型地,SAF模式筛除静态缺陷,TDF模式测试瞬态故障。但是,我们经常看到这样的情况,即SAF模式shmoo是干净的,但TDF模式shmoo是一个严重的失败,表明传统SAF模式遗漏了细胞内部静态缺陷。在这项工作中,我们将提出我们自己开发的用户自定义故障模型,该模型针对细胞内部故障来解释意外的硅观察结果。这项工作的另一个优点是,可以改进使用这些目标UDFM模式收集的错误日志的诊断结果。由于UDFM采用了有针对性的故障激励,因此诊断算法可以得到更好的调度结果。在本文中,我们还将使用我们内部的UDFM提出一个自定义诊断流,以获得更好的分辨率。将介绍三个FA案例研究,以展示所建议方法的有用性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SCM Application and Failure Analysis Procedure for Ion-Implantation Issues in Power Devices Low Angle Annular Dark Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis of Phase Change Material Report Classification for Semiconductor Failure Analysis Application and Optimization of Automated ECCI Mapping to the Analysis of Lowly Defective Epitaxial Films on Blanket or Patterned Wafers Logo Classification and Data Augmentation Techniques for PCB Assurance and Counterfeit Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1