STUCK FAULT AND CURRENT TESTING COMPARISON USING CMOS CHIP TEST

T. Storey, W. Maly, J. Andrews, M. Miske
{"title":"STUCK FAULT AND CURRENT TESTING COMPARISON USING CMOS CHIP TEST","authors":"T. Storey, W. Maly, J. Andrews, M. Miske","doi":"10.1109/TEST.1991.519523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the effectiveness of Stuck Fault and Current Testing, as applied to CMOS ICs. The comparison is performed by testing sequential CMOS chips using patterns developed via both methodis, and evaluating their ability to identify faulty prciduct. The test results are then contrasted to a previous study in which a smaller, combinatorial chip was tested by the same means. The results indicate that, for the investigated set of chips, Current Testing provides a better screen of defective product for some classes of defects, while Stuck Fault Testing is more effective on others.","PeriodicalId":272630,"journal":{"name":"1991, Proceedings. International Test Conference","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"89","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1991, Proceedings. International Test Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEST.1991.519523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 89

Abstract

This paper compares the effectiveness of Stuck Fault and Current Testing, as applied to CMOS ICs. The comparison is performed by testing sequential CMOS chips using patterns developed via both methodis, and evaluating their ability to identify faulty prciduct. The test results are then contrasted to a previous study in which a smaller, combinatorial chip was tested by the same means. The results indicate that, for the investigated set of chips, Current Testing provides a better screen of defective product for some classes of defects, while Stuck Fault Testing is more effective on others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用cmos芯片测试卡故障和电流测试比较
本文比较了卡故障测试和电流测试在CMOS芯片上的有效性。通过使用两种方法开发的模式测试顺序CMOS芯片进行比较,并评估其识别故障产品的能力。然后将测试结果与先前的研究进行对比,在先前的研究中,使用相同的方法测试了一个更小的组合芯片。结果表明,对于所研究的一组芯片,电流测试对某些类别的缺陷提供了更好的缺陷产品筛选,而卡住故障测试对其他类别的缺陷更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REAL-TIME DATA COMPARISON FOR GIGAHERTZ DIGITAL TEST REFINED BOUNDS ON SIGNATURE ANALYSIS ALIASING FOR RANDOM TESTING IMPLEMENTING BOUNDARY-SCAN AND PSEUDO-RANDOM BIST IN AN ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE SWITCH ADVANCED MIXED SIGNAL TESTING BY DSP LOCALIZED TESTER AN IEEE 1149.1 BASED LOGIC/SIGNATURE ANALYZER IN A CHIP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1