Fingerprinting Formation Breathing and Wellbore Ballooning: Getting Mixed Signals

P. Gunn, Maria Retuta
{"title":"Fingerprinting Formation Breathing and Wellbore Ballooning: Getting Mixed Signals","authors":"P. Gunn, Maria Retuta","doi":"10.2118/210548-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The use of Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) techniques allows the rapid differentiation of formation breathing or wellbore ballooning from a gas kick through a series of quick shut-in, build-up and flowback tests. These tests have proven to reduce uncertainty, NPT, and total drilling time by ensuring that operations do not enter secondary well control after mistaking flowback for a kick. Such tests provide definitive results when done correctly. However, when performed incorrectly, the wellbore response can appear either ambiguous or indicative of a kick.\n When done correctly, the ballooning test shows dissipation in both pressure build-up and flowback over time. However, when done incorrectly, both pressure and flowback can appear to gain drive. This is caused by induced losses being allowed to start equalizing with the wellbore with significant flowback volume prior to beginning the shut-in, build-up and flowback testing.\n As a result, ballooning testing can show classic signs of a gas kick as increasing pressure and flowback is observed or ambiguous results from the rising and then falling pressure and flowback. This can necessitate some combination of entering costly secondary well control and the need to trip back in to circulate bottoms up only to observe minimal signs of reservoir fluids. This paper presents type modelling that accounts for the observed unexpected results and reiterates rigid testing parameters for the successful implementation of diagnostic testing.","PeriodicalId":336268,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 28, 2022","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 28, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210548-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) techniques allows the rapid differentiation of formation breathing or wellbore ballooning from a gas kick through a series of quick shut-in, build-up and flowback tests. These tests have proven to reduce uncertainty, NPT, and total drilling time by ensuring that operations do not enter secondary well control after mistaking flowback for a kick. Such tests provide definitive results when done correctly. However, when performed incorrectly, the wellbore response can appear either ambiguous or indicative of a kick. When done correctly, the ballooning test shows dissipation in both pressure build-up and flowback over time. However, when done incorrectly, both pressure and flowback can appear to gain drive. This is caused by induced losses being allowed to start equalizing with the wellbore with significant flowback volume prior to beginning the shut-in, build-up and flowback testing. As a result, ballooning testing can show classic signs of a gas kick as increasing pressure and flowback is observed or ambiguous results from the rising and then falling pressure and flowback. This can necessitate some combination of entering costly secondary well control and the need to trip back in to circulate bottoms up only to observe minimal signs of reservoir fluids. This paper presents type modelling that accounts for the observed unexpected results and reiterates rigid testing parameters for the successful implementation of diagnostic testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指纹识别地层呼吸和井筒膨胀:获得混合信号
使用控压钻井(MPD)技术,可以通过一系列快速关井、堆积和返排测试,快速区分地层呼吸或井筒膨胀与气涌。这些测试已经证明,通过确保作业不会在误将返排视为井涌后进入二次井控,减少了不确定性、NPT和总钻井时间。如果操作正确,这些测试可提供明确的结果。然而,如果操作不当,井眼响应可能不明确,也可能表明存在井涌。当操作正确时,气球测试显示随着时间的推移,压力积聚和反排都在消散。然而,如果操作不当,压力和反排都可能获得动力。这是由于在开始关井、建井和反排测试之前,允许诱导损失开始与井筒平衡,并产生大量返排量。因此,当观察到压力增加和返排时,球囊测试可以显示气涌的典型迹象,或者从压力上升和下降以及返排中得到模糊的结果。这可能需要进行昂贵的二次井控,并且需要回钻循环,以观察到最小的储层流体迹象。本文提出了类型建模,说明了观察到的意外结果,并重申了诊断测试成功实施的刚性测试参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
First Implementation of Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) System in Swamp Barge Rig to Drill Narrow Pressure Window HPHT Exploration Well Safely – Return of Experience from Kalimantan, Indonesia Floating Casings in 10,000ft Laterals with MPD in Haynesville A New Approach for Designing an Underbalanced Cementing Plug Using a Managed Pressure Cementing and Pump-Pull Method with Narrow Pore-Frac Pressure Window in HPHT Exploration Well: An Offshore East Kalimantan, Indonesia Case Study Fingerprinting Formation Breathing and Wellbore Ballooning: Getting Mixed Signals Pressurized Mud Cap Drilling Used to Drill and Complete Carbonate Gas Reservoir with Poor Injectivity and Severe Dynamic Losses Offshore Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1