The Challenge of the Development of Complexity Approach Skills in Design Education. A Study with Design Students

Manuela Maia
{"title":"The Challenge of the Development of Complexity Approach Skills in Design Education. A Study with Design Students","authors":"Manuela Maia","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1001373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a set of questions about the conditions of design education to complexity approach in the 21st century, proposed for reflection by a previous exploratory study, we sought to deepen this problem with another study involving a greater number of design students. Our aim is a contribution to the expansion of the reflection on the designers' capacity to respond to the complexity of reality, allowing the approach to other dimensions of the problem. We search for a more precise understanding about specific learning needs of the students. Simultaneously, we intended to contribute to a more detailed understanding of the teaching-learning environment conditions that must be answered. Keeping the theoretical framework of the exploratory study, built from an important series of recent contributions on the subject, we research through a qualitative study to understand the behavior of students from different design specialties. The students were exposed to a real problem of a real organization previously known. The study was fully carried out in the students' teaching-learning environment. We defined as focus of our analysis the students’ knowledge needed for the translation of the objectives of the organization for accurately defining the problem and for the configuration of this particular design situation. The data revealed the students chose to describe possibilities for the solution, avoiding the constraints, as it was revealed by the exploratory study. We found that given the difficulty in defining the problem students focused on solutions, resorting to creativity and invention to solve the challenge. We conclude that the learning environment must be more dominated by collaboration between system different actors, with greater articulation with diverse knowledge areas. The students’ needs must activate ways for exploring the unknown, in an environment that equips them with effective tools to support learning, in addition to their motivation and commitment. The identification of concrete dimensions for framing the configuration of support tools for design education for complexity approach has already an important territory of contributions, with resources and experimented proposals for action. Powerful design learning support tools for understanding real problems in design education, must be above all useful for the inquiry base for creativity and able to be mastered by designers. With an entrepreneur attitude for the global challenges we face, these tools must allow design students to learn about possibilities for innovative solutions.","PeriodicalId":308830,"journal":{"name":"Human Dynamics and Design for the Development of Contemporary Societies","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Dynamics and Design for the Development of Contemporary Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a set of questions about the conditions of design education to complexity approach in the 21st century, proposed for reflection by a previous exploratory study, we sought to deepen this problem with another study involving a greater number of design students. Our aim is a contribution to the expansion of the reflection on the designers' capacity to respond to the complexity of reality, allowing the approach to other dimensions of the problem. We search for a more precise understanding about specific learning needs of the students. Simultaneously, we intended to contribute to a more detailed understanding of the teaching-learning environment conditions that must be answered. Keeping the theoretical framework of the exploratory study, built from an important series of recent contributions on the subject, we research through a qualitative study to understand the behavior of students from different design specialties. The students were exposed to a real problem of a real organization previously known. The study was fully carried out in the students' teaching-learning environment. We defined as focus of our analysis the students’ knowledge needed for the translation of the objectives of the organization for accurately defining the problem and for the configuration of this particular design situation. The data revealed the students chose to describe possibilities for the solution, avoiding the constraints, as it was revealed by the exploratory study. We found that given the difficulty in defining the problem students focused on solutions, resorting to creativity and invention to solve the challenge. We conclude that the learning environment must be more dominated by collaboration between system different actors, with greater articulation with diverse knowledge areas. The students’ needs must activate ways for exploring the unknown, in an environment that equips them with effective tools to support learning, in addition to their motivation and commitment. The identification of concrete dimensions for framing the configuration of support tools for design education for complexity approach has already an important territory of contributions, with resources and experimented proposals for action. Powerful design learning support tools for understanding real problems in design education, must be above all useful for the inquiry base for creativity and able to be mastered by designers. With an entrepreneur attitude for the global challenges we face, these tools must allow design students to learn about possibilities for innovative solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计教育中复杂性方法技能发展的挑战。设计专业学生的研究
先前的一项探索性研究提出了一系列关于21世纪设计教育向复杂性方法转变的条件的问题,我们试图通过另一项涉及更多设计专业学生的研究来深化这一问题。我们的目标是对设计师应对现实复杂性的能力的反思做出贡献,允许解决问题的其他方面。我们力求对学生的具体学习需求有更精确的理解。同时,我们打算对必须回答的教学环境条件作出更详细的了解。在探索性研究的理论框架下,我们通过定性研究来了解来自不同设计专业的学生的行为。学生们接触到了一个真实组织的真实问题。本研究完全在学生的教与学环境中进行。我们将学生的知识定义为我们分析的重点,这些知识用于翻译组织的目标,以准确地定义问题和配置这个特定的设计情况。数据显示,学生选择描述解决方案的可能性,避免约束,因为探索性研究揭示了这一点。我们发现,在难以定义问题的情况下,学生们专注于解决方案,诉诸创造力和发明来解决挑战。我们得出的结论是,学习环境必须更多地由系统不同参与者之间的合作所主导,并与不同的知识领域有更大的联系。学生的需求必须激活探索未知的方式,在一个环境中,为他们提供有效的工具来支持学习,除了他们的动机和承诺。为复杂性方法的设计教育确定支持工具配置框架的具体维度已经是一个重要的贡献领域,有资源和实验性的行动建议。在设计教育中理解实际问题的强大的设计学习支持工具,首先必须对创造力的探究基础有用,并且能够被设计师所掌握。面对我们所面临的全球挑战,这些工具必须让设计专业的学生了解创新解决方案的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Slipper Palace. Creative Entrepreneurship for the Common Good [de]Territorialization, the Role of our Brain in a Technological World. Biomateriality Bridging Design and the Community Overcrowded Ecologies: Designing Value through More-than-Human Factors Cohort Study Good Practices: Design Communication and Capacitation Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1