ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN PSİKOLOJİK KIRILGANLIKLARI, PSİKOLOJİK İYİLİK HALLERİ VE SOSYAL GÜVEN VE MEMNUNİYET DÜZEYLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN KARDEŞ SAYISINA GÖRE İNCELENMESİ

Abstract

Bu arastirmada, universite ogrencilerinin psikolojik kirilganliklari, psikolojik iyilik halleri, sosyal guven ve memnuniyet duzeyleri arasindaki iliski cinsiyet degiskenine gore incelenmistir. Arastirmada, “Psikolojik kirilganlik olcegi”, “Psikolojik iyilik olcegi”, “Sosyal guven ve memnuniyet duzeyi olcegi” olmak uzere 3 adet olcek uygulanmistir. ANOVA sonrasi belirlenen anlamli farkliligin hangi gruplardan kaynaklandigini belirlemek uzere tamamlayici post-hoc analiz teknikleri sonucunda, psikolojik kirilganlik olceginde kardes sayisinin karsilastirmasinda 2 olcekte tek anlamli bir fark gorulmekte, ANOVA- Kardes Sayisi- psikolojik iyilik halindeki gruplar arasindaki farkta olcegin yarisinda anlamli bir farkin oldugu ve kalan diger gruplarin kardes sayilarina gore anlamli bir fark bulunmadigi sonucuna ulasilmistir. ANOVA sonrasi belirlenen post-hoc analiz sonucunda kardes sayisi- psikolojik iyilik haline gore karsilastirmada sadece 2 maddede anlamli bir fark var, geriye kalan maddelerin tumunde anlamsiz bir fark ortaya cikmistir. ANOVA sosyal guven ve memnuniyet olceginde kardes sayisina gore belirlenen gruplar arasindaki farkta sadece 2 maddede anlamli bir fark oldugu geriye kalan kisimda anlamli bir fark olmadigi bulunmustur. ANOVA sonrasi belirlenen post-hoc analiz sonucunda sosyal guven ve memnuniyet duzeyleri olceginde kardes sayisina gore ise tek bir maddede anlamli bir fark var oldugu ve kalan diger maddeler arasinda anlamli bir fark olmadigi belirlenmistir. A RESEARCH OF THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE UNDERGRADUATES’ PSYCHOLOGICAL VULNERABILITY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND SOCIAL TRUST AND SATISFACTION LEVELS ACCORDING TO THE NUMBER OF SIBLINGS Abstract In this study, some variables are analysed in terms of the relationships among the undergraduates’ psychological vulnerability, psychological well-being, social trust and satisfaction levels according to the gender variable. Three scales; named such as “Psychological vulnerability scale”, “Psychological well-being scale”, “Social trust and satisfaction level scale” are applied in the frame of the study. As a result of the complementary post-hoc analysis techniques in order to determine which groups caused the significant difference after ANOVA, it is seen that there is only one meaningful difference in 2 scales in the comparison of the number of siblings in the psychological fragility scale. It is also concluded that there is a meaningful difference in the half of the scale between groups in ANOVA - Number of Siblings - psychological well-being. It is concluded that there is no meaningful difference for the number of siblings in the remaining groups. As a result of the post-hoc analysis determined after ANOVA, there is a meaningful difference in only 2 themes when comparing the number of siblings-psychological well-being criteria, a meaningless difference is emerged in all of the remaining themes. It is found out that there is a meaningful difference in only 2 themes in the difference between the groups determined by the number of siblings in the ANOVA social trust and satisfaction scale and no significant difference in the rest of the themes whatsoever. As a result of the post-hoc analysis determined after ANOVA, it is discovered that there is a meaningful difference in one theme according to the number of siblings in the social trust and satisfaction level scale, and there is no meaningful difference between the remaining themes.