Identifying literacy and numeracy skill mismatch in OECD countries using the job analysis method

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Oxford Economic Papers-New Series Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1093/oep/gpad045
Sandra Pérez Rodríguez, Rolf van der Velden, Tim Huijts, Babs Jacobs
{"title":"Identifying literacy and numeracy skill mismatch in OECD countries using the job analysis method","authors":"Sandra Pérez Rodríguez, Rolf van der Velden, Tim Huijts, Babs Jacobs","doi":"10.1093/oep/gpad045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) is currently the most important data source that provides information on the key skills possessed by workers, including literacy and numeracy. However, to assess skill mismatch, we also need information on the required skills in those domains, measured in the same metric and scale. In this article, we use the Job Analysis Method (JAM) to determine the required skill levels of literacy and numeracy for all four-digit International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) 2008 unit groups. JAM is often considered the ‘gold standard’ in estimating required levels but has never been used in the context of PIAAC. This article thus presents the first results on the prevalence of skill mismatches using JAM comparing different OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries and different occupations. We compare our results with alternative methods and show some advantages of using JAM. We discuss some of the limitations as well.","PeriodicalId":48092,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Economic Papers-New Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Economic Papers-New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpad045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) is currently the most important data source that provides information on the key skills possessed by workers, including literacy and numeracy. However, to assess skill mismatch, we also need information on the required skills in those domains, measured in the same metric and scale. In this article, we use the Job Analysis Method (JAM) to determine the required skill levels of literacy and numeracy for all four-digit International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) 2008 unit groups. JAM is often considered the ‘gold standard’ in estimating required levels but has never been used in the context of PIAAC. This article thus presents the first results on the prevalence of skill mismatches using JAM comparing different OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries and different occupations. We compare our results with alternative methods and show some advantages of using JAM. We discuss some of the limitations as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用工作分析方法确定经合组织国家的读写和计算技能不匹配
国际成人能力评估计划(PIAAC)是目前最重要的数据来源,它提供了关于工人所拥有的关键技能的信息,包括识字和算术。然而,为了评估技能不匹配,我们还需要这些领域所需技能的信息,以相同的度量和尺度进行测量。在本文中,我们使用工作分析方法(JAM)来确定所有四位数国际职业标准分类(ISCO) 2008单元组所需的读写和计算技能水平。JAM通常被认为是估算所需水平的“黄金标准”,但从未在PIAAC中使用过。因此,本文提出了使用JAM比较不同经合组织(经济合作与发展组织)国家和不同职业的技能不匹配流行程度的第一个结果。我们将我们的结果与其他方法进行了比较,并显示了使用JAM的一些优点。我们还讨论了一些限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Oxford Economic Papers is a general economics journal, publishing refereed papers in economic theory, applied economics, econometrics, economic development, economic history, and the history of economic thought. It occasionally publishes survey articles in addition to original papers. Books are not reviewed, but substantial review articles are considered. The journal occasionally publishes survey articles in addition to original papers, and occasionally publishes special issues or symposia.
期刊最新文献
Endogenous learning in international environmental agreements: the impact of research spillovers and the degree of cooperation International co-movements of inflation, 1851–1913 Banking structural reforms and top income shares: regulate or deregulate? Public- and private-sector jobs: a cross-country perspective Identifying literacy and numeracy skill mismatch in OECD countries using the job analysis method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1