Public- and private-sector jobs: a cross-country perspective

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Oxford Economic Papers-New Series Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1093/oep/gpad044
Alessandra Fenizia, Daniele Checchi, Claudio Lucifora
{"title":"Public- and private-sector jobs: a cross-country perspective","authors":"Alessandra Fenizia, Daniele Checchi, Claudio Lucifora","doi":"10.1093/oep/gpad044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reassesses the conventional wisdom that public-sector jobs have worse pay but better amenities than equivalent private-sector jobs, using data from 22 European countries and the USA. Earnings gaps are shown to be heterogeneous across countries—public sector work carries a premium in Europe but a penalty in the USA. However, whereas European public-sector workers report better job amenities—better job security and work–life balance—than their private-sector counterparts, there are no public–private amenity differentials for US workers. Public-sector work also has fewer pay-for-performance schemes. Finally, the public sector does not seem to ensure a fairer work environment, compared to the private sector, in terms of workplace discrimination and harassment. These stylized facts inform the external validity of extrapolating individual case studies to different contexts.","PeriodicalId":48092,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Economic Papers-New Series","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Economic Papers-New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpad044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article reassesses the conventional wisdom that public-sector jobs have worse pay but better amenities than equivalent private-sector jobs, using data from 22 European countries and the USA. Earnings gaps are shown to be heterogeneous across countries—public sector work carries a premium in Europe but a penalty in the USA. However, whereas European public-sector workers report better job amenities—better job security and work–life balance—than their private-sector counterparts, there are no public–private amenity differentials for US workers. Public-sector work also has fewer pay-for-performance schemes. Finally, the public sector does not seem to ensure a fairer work environment, compared to the private sector, in terms of workplace discrimination and harassment. These stylized facts inform the external validity of extrapolating individual case studies to different contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共和私营部门的工作:一个跨国的视角
本文使用来自22个欧洲国家和美国的数据,重新评估了公共部门工作比同等私营部门工作工资更低但福利更好的传统观点。各国之间的收入差距存在差异——公共部门工作在欧洲是溢价,但在美国是惩罚性的。然而,与私营部门相比,欧洲公共部门的员工有更好的工作条件——更好的工作保障和工作与生活的平衡,而美国的员工没有公私福利的差异。公共部门工作的绩效工资计划也较少。最后,在工作场所歧视和骚扰方面,与私营部门相比,公共部门似乎并没有确保一个更公平的工作环境。这些程式化的事实告知了将个别案例研究外推到不同背景的外部有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Oxford Economic Papers is a general economics journal, publishing refereed papers in economic theory, applied economics, econometrics, economic development, economic history, and the history of economic thought. It occasionally publishes survey articles in addition to original papers. Books are not reviewed, but substantial review articles are considered. The journal occasionally publishes survey articles in addition to original papers, and occasionally publishes special issues or symposia.
期刊最新文献
Endogenous learning in international environmental agreements: the impact of research spillovers and the degree of cooperation International co-movements of inflation, 1851–1913 Banking structural reforms and top income shares: regulate or deregulate? Public- and private-sector jobs: a cross-country perspective Identifying literacy and numeracy skill mismatch in OECD countries using the job analysis method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1