Banking structural reforms and top income shares: regulate or deregulate?

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Oxford Economic Papers-New Series Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1093/oep/gpad046
Carola Casti
{"title":"Banking structural reforms and top income shares: regulate or deregulate?","authors":"Carola Casti","doi":"10.1093/oep/gpad046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article investigates if, and to what extent, banking structural reforms may affect the top income shares over time. Canada and Italy are used as case studies, as both countries undertook a major deregulation and liberalization process within their banking sector in the early 1990s. These banking policies aimed at privatizing the banking sector and reintroducing the quasi universal banking model. The evaluation of these policy packages is undertaken by implementing the Synthetic Control Method. Findings point out, overall, a robust and substantial increase of some of the top income shares in both countries, over the post-deregulation period. This work contributes by also identifying the main potential mechanisms—both direct and indirect—via which banking deregulation might have operated.","PeriodicalId":48092,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Economic Papers-New Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Economic Papers-New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpad046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates if, and to what extent, banking structural reforms may affect the top income shares over time. Canada and Italy are used as case studies, as both countries undertook a major deregulation and liberalization process within their banking sector in the early 1990s. These banking policies aimed at privatizing the banking sector and reintroducing the quasi universal banking model. The evaluation of these policy packages is undertaken by implementing the Synthetic Control Method. Findings point out, overall, a robust and substantial increase of some of the top income shares in both countries, over the post-deregulation period. This work contributes by also identifying the main potential mechanisms—both direct and indirect—via which banking deregulation might have operated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行业结构改革与最高收入比例:监管还是放松监管?
摘要本文探讨了银行结构改革是否会随着时间的推移影响高收入阶层的收入份额,以及在多大程度上影响高收入阶层。加拿大和意大利被用作案例研究,因为这两个国家在1990年代初在其银行部门进行了重大的放松管制和自由化进程。这些银行政策旨在将银行部门私有化,并重新引入准全能银行模式。通过实施综合控制方法对这些政策包进行评估。调查结果指出,总体而言,在放松管制后的时期,两国的一些最高收入份额都出现了强劲而大幅的增长。这项工作的贡献还在于确定了银行放松管制可能发挥作用的主要潜在机制(包括直接机制和间接机制)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Oxford Economic Papers is a general economics journal, publishing refereed papers in economic theory, applied economics, econometrics, economic development, economic history, and the history of economic thought. It occasionally publishes survey articles in addition to original papers. Books are not reviewed, but substantial review articles are considered. The journal occasionally publishes survey articles in addition to original papers, and occasionally publishes special issues or symposia.
期刊最新文献
Endogenous learning in international environmental agreements: the impact of research spillovers and the degree of cooperation International co-movements of inflation, 1851–1913 Banking structural reforms and top income shares: regulate or deregulate? Public- and private-sector jobs: a cross-country perspective Identifying literacy and numeracy skill mismatch in OECD countries using the job analysis method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1