Decolonizing Comparative Literature

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE Comparative Critical Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.3366/ccs.2023.0478
Anna Bernard
{"title":"Decolonizing Comparative Literature","authors":"Anna Bernard","doi":"10.3366/ccs.2023.0478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay seeks to contribute to ongoing debates about disciplinary decolonization in Comparative Literature by urging scholars and students to return to the literature and theory of twentieth-century anticolonial liberation struggles. I begin by considering the relationship of Comparative Literature as it is currently practised in the metropolitan academy to earlier projects of cultural decolonization, focusing particularly on the contrast between the depoliticized ‘worlding’ of the discipline and the more radical and purposeful comparative praxis demonstrated by the Afro-Asian Writers' Association's literary journal Lotus (1968–91). I then turn to examples of literary criticism by two major fiction writers, theorists and party activists with ties to Lotus: Ghassan Kanafani (Palestine, 1936–72) and Alex La Guma (South Africa, 1924–85). Putting their work into conversation enables us to challenge the distance from organized struggle that most contemporary criticism maintains, while also developing our understanding of the conditions, principles, and tactics of what Kanafani famously called adab al-muqāwama, or resistance literature, a concept that any attempt to decolonize Comparative Literature cannot do without.","PeriodicalId":42644,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Critical Studies","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Critical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2023.0478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay seeks to contribute to ongoing debates about disciplinary decolonization in Comparative Literature by urging scholars and students to return to the literature and theory of twentieth-century anticolonial liberation struggles. I begin by considering the relationship of Comparative Literature as it is currently practised in the metropolitan academy to earlier projects of cultural decolonization, focusing particularly on the contrast between the depoliticized ‘worlding’ of the discipline and the more radical and purposeful comparative praxis demonstrated by the Afro-Asian Writers' Association's literary journal Lotus (1968–91). I then turn to examples of literary criticism by two major fiction writers, theorists and party activists with ties to Lotus: Ghassan Kanafani (Palestine, 1936–72) and Alex La Guma (South Africa, 1924–85). Putting their work into conversation enables us to challenge the distance from organized struggle that most contemporary criticism maintains, while also developing our understanding of the conditions, principles, and tactics of what Kanafani famously called adab al-muqāwama, or resistance literature, a concept that any attempt to decolonize Comparative Literature cannot do without.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非殖民化的比较文学
本文旨在通过敦促学者和学生回归二十世纪反殖民解放斗争的文学和理论,为比较文学中学科非殖民化的持续辩论做出贡献。我首先考虑比较文学的关系,因为它目前在大都会学院实践与早期的文化非殖民化项目,特别关注学科的非政治化“世界”与亚非作家协会的文学期刊Lotus(1968-91)所展示的更激进和有目的的比较实践之间的对比。然后,我转向两位与莲花有联系的主要小说作家、理论家和政党活动家的文学批评例子:加桑·卡纳法尼(巴勒斯坦,1936-72)和亚历克斯·拉古马(南非,1924-85)。将他们的作品置于对话中,使我们能够挑战大多数当代批评所保持的与有组织斗争的距离,同时也使我们对卡纳法尼著名的adab al-muqāwama或抵抗文学的条件、原则和策略有了更深入的了解,这是任何试图将比较文学非殖民化的尝试都离不开的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Comparing Translations of Dante’s Commedia Pasolini and Minor Comparativism: Transnationalizing Dialect Poetry Structural Comparison, Transfers and Unequal Power Relations: Field Theory as a Conceptual and Methodological Tool Decolonizing Comparative Literature Comp Lit’s Other Half: In Defense of Literature, with Lao She
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1