Insufficient Evidence for Multiple Species of Tyrannosaurus in the Latest Cretaceous of North America: A Comment on “The Tyrant Lizard King, Queen and Emperor: Multiple Lines of Morphological and Stratigraphic Evidence Support Subtle Evolution and Probable Speciation Within the North American Genus Tyrannosaurus”

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Evolutionary Biology Pub Date : 2022-07-25 DOI:10.1007/s11692-022-09573-1
Thomas D. Carr, James G. Napoli, Stephen L. Brusatte, Thomas R. Holtz, David W. E. Hone, Thomas E. Williamson, Lindsay E. Zanno
{"title":"Insufficient Evidence for Multiple Species of Tyrannosaurus in the Latest Cretaceous of North America: A Comment on “The Tyrant Lizard King, Queen and Emperor: Multiple Lines of Morphological and Stratigraphic Evidence Support Subtle Evolution and Probable Speciation Within the North American Genus Tyrannosaurus”","authors":"Thomas D. Carr, James G. Napoli, Stephen L. Brusatte, Thomas R. Holtz, David W. E. Hone, Thomas E. Williamson, Lindsay E. Zanno","doi":"10.1007/s11692-022-09573-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Late Cretaceous dinosaur <i>Tyrannosaurus rex</i> was recently split into three species based on the premise that variation in the <i>T. rex</i> hypodigm is exceptional, indicating cryptic species and “robust” and “gracile” morphs. The morphs are based on proportional ratios throughout the skeleton. The species are claimed to be stratigraphically separate, with an early robust species followed by robust and gracile descendants. There are problems with the hypothesis: the taxon diagnoses are based on two features that overlap between the species; several skulls cannot be identified based on the diagnoses; proportional comparisons between <i>Tyrannosaurus</i> and other theropods are based on incomparable samples; the tooth data are problematic; the stratigraphic framework divides the Hell Creek Formation into thirds, without the stratigraphic position of each specimen, or independent age control showing the subdivisions are coeval over the entire geographic area; previous work found variation in <i>T. rex</i>, but it cannot be parsed into discrete categories. We tested for “gracile” and “robust” morphs by analyzing the femoral and tooth ratios that were published in the multiple species study using agglomerative hierarchical clustering. The results found that each set of ratios are explained by one cluster, showing that dimorphism is not supported. We tested for exceptional variation of the femoral ratio of <i>Tyrannosaurus</i>; we calculated the mean intraspecific robusticity for 112 species of living birds and 4 nonavian theropods. The results showed that the absolute variation in <i>Tyrannosaurus</i> is unexceptional and it does not indicate cryptic diversity. We conclude that “<i>T. regina</i>” and “<i>T. imperator</i>” are subjective junior synonyms of <i>T. rex</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50471,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-022-09573-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Late Cretaceous dinosaur Tyrannosaurus rex was recently split into three species based on the premise that variation in the T. rex hypodigm is exceptional, indicating cryptic species and “robust” and “gracile” morphs. The morphs are based on proportional ratios throughout the skeleton. The species are claimed to be stratigraphically separate, with an early robust species followed by robust and gracile descendants. There are problems with the hypothesis: the taxon diagnoses are based on two features that overlap between the species; several skulls cannot be identified based on the diagnoses; proportional comparisons between Tyrannosaurus and other theropods are based on incomparable samples; the tooth data are problematic; the stratigraphic framework divides the Hell Creek Formation into thirds, without the stratigraphic position of each specimen, or independent age control showing the subdivisions are coeval over the entire geographic area; previous work found variation in T. rex, but it cannot be parsed into discrete categories. We tested for “gracile” and “robust” morphs by analyzing the femoral and tooth ratios that were published in the multiple species study using agglomerative hierarchical clustering. The results found that each set of ratios are explained by one cluster, showing that dimorphism is not supported. We tested for exceptional variation of the femoral ratio of Tyrannosaurus; we calculated the mean intraspecific robusticity for 112 species of living birds and 4 nonavian theropods. The results showed that the absolute variation in Tyrannosaurus is unexceptional and it does not indicate cryptic diversity. We conclude that “T. regina” and “T. imperator” are subjective junior synonyms of T. rex.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北美晚白垩纪多种暴龙的证据不足:评《暴君蜥蜴王、王后和皇帝:多条形态和地层证据支持北美暴龙属的微妙进化和可能的物种形成》
晚白垩纪恐龙雷克斯暴龙(Tyrannosaurus rex)最近被划分为三个物种,这一假设的前提是雷克斯暴龙下半段的变异是例外的,表明了物种的隐匿性以及“健壮”和“纤细”的变种。这些形态是基于整个骨架的比例。这些物种在地层上是分开的,有一个早期强壮的物种,然后是强壮和纤细的后代。这一假设存在一些问题:分类群的诊断是基于物种之间重叠的两个特征;根据诊断,一些头骨无法识别;暴龙和其他兽脚亚目恐龙之间的比例比较是基于不可比较的样本;牙齿数据是有问题的;地层格架将地狱溪组划分为三部分,没有每个标本的地层位置,也没有独立的年龄控制,表明这些细分是在整个地理区域的同一时期;之前的研究发现了霸王龙的变异,但它不能被分解成离散的类别。我们通过使用聚集分层聚类分析多物种研究中发表的股骨和牙齿比率来测试“纤细”和“健壮”形态。结果发现,每一组比率都被一个簇解释,表明二态性不被支持。我们测试了暴龙股骨比例的异常变化;我们计算了112种现存鸟类和4种非鸟类兽脚亚目动物的种内健壮性平均值。结果表明,暴龙的绝对变异是不例外的,它并不表明隐藏的多样性。我们得出结论,“T。雷吉娜”和“T。“统治者”是霸王龙主观的低级同义词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Biology
Evolutionary Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim, scope, and format of Evolutionary Biology will be based on the following principles: Evolutionary Biology will publish original articles and reviews that address issues and subjects of core concern in evolutionary biology. All papers must make original contributions to our understanding of the evolutionary process. The journal will remain true to the original intent of the original series to provide a place for broad syntheses in evolutionary biology. Articles will contribute to this goal by defining the direction of current and future research and by building conceptual links between disciplines. In articles presenting an empirical analysis, the results of these analyses must be integrated within a broader evolutionary framework. Authors are encouraged to submit papers presenting novel conceptual frameworks or major challenges to accepted ideas. While brevity is encouraged, there is no formal restriction on length for major articles. The journal aims to keep the time between original submission and appearance online to within four months and will encourage authors to revise rapidly once a paper has been submitted and deemed acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Diving into Diversity: The Complex Evolutionary History and Species Richness of the ‘sawfin barbs’ from Lake Edward and Adjacent Systems A Specialized Combination: The Relationship between Reproductive Structure Arrangement and Breeding Systems in oil-rewarding Calceolaria Species (Calceolariaceae) Restructuring of Skull Modularity Pattern in Evolution Within Myotis myotis–Myotis blythii Species Group (Vespertilionidae, Chiroptera, Mammalia) Correction: Effects of Procrustes Superimposition and Semilandmark Sliding on Modularity and Integration: An Investigation Using Simulations of Biological Data A Graph-Based Mathematical Model for More Efficient Dimensionality Reduction of Landmark Data in Geometric Morphometrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1