Rēzekne Jewish Cemetery as a Representative Substructure of the “Other” in the Culture of Latgale

Olga Senkāne
{"title":"Rēzekne Jewish Cemetery as a Representative Substructure of the “Other” in the Culture of Latgale","authors":"Olga Senkāne","doi":"10.15388/ahas.2023.30.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to analyze the verbal and non-verbal signs of the Rēzekne Jewish cemetery with the cultural semiotic approach and to find out the hybridization features of the Jewish semiosphere in Latgale. The article describes the Rēzekne Jewish cemetery as a representative substructure of the “other” in the culture of Latgale with special traditions of language and ritual graphics, valuable genealogical material and historical evidence about the fate of local Jews and with a special tomb cult, determined by the ethnically diverse environment. Jews in Latgale have always nurtured and preserved their cultural otherness; this is also characteristic of their traditions of arranging cemeteries. Depending on the cultural and social trends of the relevant era, it is possible to trace changes in the formation of grave inscriptions, graphics and forms. Interrelations with the traditions of the local majority, the Latgalians, show the hybridization of the culture of Jewish cemeteries. In the 20th century, Yiddish is gradually disappearing from grave inscriptions, that is caused by decreasing of the number of its speakers. During the Soviet occupation, the role of the sacred language – Hebrew in grave inscriptions decreased, while the proportion of Russian in the narrative of the inscriptions increased. During the last decade of the 20th century, grave inscriptions are predominant in Russian, which confirms the decline in the number of Hebrew speakers. The symbolic meaning of tomb cult graphics in the second half of the 20th century levels off, and local Jews take over Latgalian traditions of the design of tombstones. The graphic shows the transmission of information to the receivers of the “other” culture, for example, the yellow Star of David is represented instead of the menorah, since the yellow six-pointed star is more recognizable to the local population as a testimony of the Holocaust. A menorah may not cause an association with a Jew, because candles and candlesticks are usual graphic elements of Latgalian tombs. Such a trend in the choice of symbols indicates a unique cultural dialogue and its implementation tools, which are oriented towards the self-presentation of a separate ethnic group, using recognizable stereotypical signs instead of specific cult symbols, the language of local residents instead of their sacred language. They want to be understood and understandable for themselves because the number of people who know the authentic meaning of Hebrew and sacred cult signs in Latgale and Rēzekne is quite small. In any case, communication or cultural dialogue still exists, at least the tomb culture is still capable of transmitting its basic values in the form of stereotypical, well-known signs. In this way, the “other” tends to be noticed and understood.","PeriodicalId":502376,"journal":{"name":"Acta humanitarica academiae Saulensis","volume":"116 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta humanitarica academiae Saulensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/ahas.2023.30.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the verbal and non-verbal signs of the Rēzekne Jewish cemetery with the cultural semiotic approach and to find out the hybridization features of the Jewish semiosphere in Latgale. The article describes the Rēzekne Jewish cemetery as a representative substructure of the “other” in the culture of Latgale with special traditions of language and ritual graphics, valuable genealogical material and historical evidence about the fate of local Jews and with a special tomb cult, determined by the ethnically diverse environment. Jews in Latgale have always nurtured and preserved their cultural otherness; this is also characteristic of their traditions of arranging cemeteries. Depending on the cultural and social trends of the relevant era, it is possible to trace changes in the formation of grave inscriptions, graphics and forms. Interrelations with the traditions of the local majority, the Latgalians, show the hybridization of the culture of Jewish cemeteries. In the 20th century, Yiddish is gradually disappearing from grave inscriptions, that is caused by decreasing of the number of its speakers. During the Soviet occupation, the role of the sacred language – Hebrew in grave inscriptions decreased, while the proportion of Russian in the narrative of the inscriptions increased. During the last decade of the 20th century, grave inscriptions are predominant in Russian, which confirms the decline in the number of Hebrew speakers. The symbolic meaning of tomb cult graphics in the second half of the 20th century levels off, and local Jews take over Latgalian traditions of the design of tombstones. The graphic shows the transmission of information to the receivers of the “other” culture, for example, the yellow Star of David is represented instead of the menorah, since the yellow six-pointed star is more recognizable to the local population as a testimony of the Holocaust. A menorah may not cause an association with a Jew, because candles and candlesticks are usual graphic elements of Latgalian tombs. Such a trend in the choice of symbols indicates a unique cultural dialogue and its implementation tools, which are oriented towards the self-presentation of a separate ethnic group, using recognizable stereotypical signs instead of specific cult symbols, the language of local residents instead of their sacred language. They want to be understood and understandable for themselves because the number of people who know the authentic meaning of Hebrew and sacred cult signs in Latgale and Rēzekne is quite small. In any case, communication or cultural dialogue still exists, at least the tomb culture is still capable of transmitting its basic values in the form of stereotypical, well-known signs. In this way, the “other” tends to be noticed and understood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为拉特加莱文化中 "他者 "的代表性子结构的 Rēzekne 犹太人墓地
本研究的目的是用文化符号学方法分析 Rēzekne 犹太人墓地的语言和非语言符号,并找出拉特加尔犹太人符号圈的混合特征。文章将 Rēzekne 犹太人墓地描述为拉特加莱文化中 "他者 "的代表性子结构,具有特殊的语言和仪式图形传统、宝贵的家谱材料和有关当地犹太人命运的历史证据,以及由种族多样性环境决定的特殊坟墓崇拜。 拉特加莱的犹太人一直在培养和保护自己的文化独特性;这也是他们安排墓地传统的特点。根据相关时代的文化和社会趋势,可以追溯到坟墓碑文、图形和形式的形成变化。与当地大多数拉特加尔人的传统之间的相互关系显示了犹太墓地文化的杂交。20 世纪,依地语逐渐从墓志铭中消失,这是因为讲依地语的人越来越少。在苏联占领期间,神圣语言--希伯来语在墓志铭中的作用下降,而俄语在墓志铭叙述中所占的比例上升。20 世纪最后十年,墓志铭中俄语占主导地位,这证明了希伯来语使用者人数的减少。20 世纪下半叶,坟墓崇拜图形的象征意义逐渐减弱,当地犹太人继承了拉特加尔人设计墓碑的传统。这些图形向 "另一种 "文化的接受者传递信息,例如,用黄色的大卫之星代替灯台,因为黄色的六芒星更容易被当地人识别为大屠杀的见证。灯台可能不会让人联想到犹太人,因为蜡烛和烛台是拉特加尔人墓葬中常见的图形元素。符号选择上的这种趋势表明了一种独特的文化对话及其实施手段,这种对话和实施手 段都是以一个独立民族的自我展示为导向,使用可识别的定型符号而不是特定的崇拜符 号,使用当地居民的语言而不是他们的神圣语言。他们希望自己能被理解,因为在拉特加莱和里泽克内,知道希伯来语和神圣崇拜符号真正含义的人很少。无论如何,交流或文化对话仍然存在,至少古墓文化仍然能够以刻板的、众所周知的符号形式传播其基本价值观。通过这种方式,"他者 "往往会得到关注和理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neaiškios etimologijos Klaipėdos krašto hidronimai: Ketvergio upalis, Neknupis, Plocis, Rikinė, Župė / Župis Laiškai iš praeities: Justino Marcinkevičiaus laiškai mokytojai Genovaitei Andrašiūnienei Lietuvos ir Latvijos pasienio (Palatvijo) regiono samprata Motiejaus Valančiaus Vaikų knygelės leidybos pėdsakais Rēzekne Jewish Cemetery as a Representative Substructure of the “Other” in the Culture of Latgale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1