Evaluating the use of self-conditioning adhesive combined with dual curing resin cement as an endodontic sealer: An in vitro study.

C. I. Anton y Otero, Nicolas Liaudet, E. di Bella, M. Abdelaziz, A. Feilzer, I. Krejci, L. Marger
{"title":"Evaluating the use of self-conditioning adhesive combined with dual curing resin cement as an endodontic sealer: An in vitro study.","authors":"C. I. Anton y Otero, Nicolas Liaudet, E. di Bella, M. Abdelaziz, A. Feilzer, I. Krejci, L. Marger","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2023.2282523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives To compare infiltration, sealing and microleakage in root dentin with a self-conditioning adhesive system combined with dual curing resin (resin-based cement) to a conventional epoxy-resin-based sealer using confocal microscopy imaging. Methods 26 roots were enlarged and disinfected. Dentin tubules of 24 teeth were labelled with a red fluorophore (Rhodamine B) (two samples served as controls). Root canal samples were sealed in group AH (n = 11) with a conventional sealer (AH Plus Root Canal Sealer, Dentsply DeTrey) and in group RC (n = 11) with a resin-based cement (Parabond combined with Paracore, Coltène). Roots were then sectioned horizontally and immersed in H2O2 to remove the Rhodamine B not fixed by the sealers. The empty dentin spaces were labeled with a green fluorophore (Fluorescein) enabling the evaluation of infiltration as well as microleakage by confocal microscopy. Two additional samples were fractured in vertical direction for observation under SEM. Results Group RC presented significantly more infiltration in the middle third than in the middle and apical thirds of group AH. Microleakage was significantly higher in group AH than in group RC. SEM images revealed more dentin plugs and a homogenous resin layer in group RC in contrast to group AH. Conclusion The resin-based cement revealed promising outcomes compared to a traditional epoxy resin based sealer. Key messages Infiltration and microleakage in infiltrated and sealed root dentin samples are higher in middle than apical root thirds. Root dentin infiltration and sealing with a self-conditioning adhesive system and a dual-curing resin cement revealed less microleakage than with an epoxy-resin-based sealer.","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2023.2282523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To compare infiltration, sealing and microleakage in root dentin with a self-conditioning adhesive system combined with dual curing resin (resin-based cement) to a conventional epoxy-resin-based sealer using confocal microscopy imaging. Methods 26 roots were enlarged and disinfected. Dentin tubules of 24 teeth were labelled with a red fluorophore (Rhodamine B) (two samples served as controls). Root canal samples were sealed in group AH (n = 11) with a conventional sealer (AH Plus Root Canal Sealer, Dentsply DeTrey) and in group RC (n = 11) with a resin-based cement (Parabond combined with Paracore, Coltène). Roots were then sectioned horizontally and immersed in H2O2 to remove the Rhodamine B not fixed by the sealers. The empty dentin spaces were labeled with a green fluorophore (Fluorescein) enabling the evaluation of infiltration as well as microleakage by confocal microscopy. Two additional samples were fractured in vertical direction for observation under SEM. Results Group RC presented significantly more infiltration in the middle third than in the middle and apical thirds of group AH. Microleakage was significantly higher in group AH than in group RC. SEM images revealed more dentin plugs and a homogenous resin layer in group RC in contrast to group AH. Conclusion The resin-based cement revealed promising outcomes compared to a traditional epoxy resin based sealer. Key messages Infiltration and microleakage in infiltrated and sealed root dentin samples are higher in middle than apical root thirds. Root dentin infiltration and sealing with a self-conditioning adhesive system and a dual-curing resin cement revealed less microleakage than with an epoxy-resin-based sealer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估自调节粘合剂与双固化树脂粘结剂结合作为牙髓密封剂的使用情况:体外研究
摘要 目的 使用共聚焦显微镜成像技术,比较自调理粘合剂系统结合双固化树脂(树脂基水泥)与传统环氧树脂基封固剂在根部牙本质中的浸润、封闭和微渗漏情况。方法 对 26 个牙根进行放大和消毒。用红色荧光团(罗丹明 B)标记 24 颗牙齿的牙本质小管(两个样本作为对照组)。根管样本在 AH 组(n = 11)中使用传统封闭剂(AH Plus 根管封闭剂,Dentsply DeTrey 公司)进行封闭,在 RC 组(n = 11)中使用树脂粘结剂(Parabond 与 Paracore 结合使用,Coltène 公司)进行封闭。然后将牙根水平切片并浸泡在 H2O2 中,以去除未被封闭剂固定的罗丹明 B。用绿色荧光团(荧光素)标记空的牙本质空隙,以便通过共聚焦显微镜评估渗透和微渗漏情况。另外两个样本被垂直折断,以便在扫描电镜下观察。结果 RC 组中间三分之一处的浸润明显多于 AH 组中间和顶端三分之一处的浸润。AH 组的微渗漏率明显高于 RC 组。扫描电子显微镜图像显示,与 AH 组相比,RC 组的牙本质栓更多,树脂层更均匀。结论 与传统的环氧树脂封闭剂相比,树脂封闭剂具有良好的效果。关键信息 根部牙本质浸润和密封样本中的浸润和微渗漏在根中部高于根尖三分之一处。与使用环氧树脂封闭剂相比,使用自调节粘接剂系统和双固化树脂粘接剂进行根牙本质浸润和封闭时,微渗漏较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects. Silane and acid etch cross contamination of dentin and composite reduced µ-tensile bond strength. Recipient of Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry's Young Author Award 2023. Reliability and agreement of root length measurements during orthodontic treatment in images from different CBCT machines using multiplanar reconstruction. The sealing ability of different endodontic biomaterials as an intra-orifice barrier: evaluation with high-performance liquid chromatography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1