Validation of an eight-item resilience scale for inpatients with spinal cord injuries in a rehabilitation hospital: exploratory factor analyses and item response theory.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2308643
Chungyi Chiu, Xiaotian Gao, Rongxiu Wu, Jeanna Campbell, James Krause, Simon Driver
{"title":"Validation of an eight-item resilience scale for inpatients with spinal cord injuries in a rehabilitation hospital: exploratory factor analyses and item response theory.","authors":"Chungyi Chiu, Xiaotian Gao, Rongxiu Wu, Jeanna Campbell, James Krause, Simon Driver","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2308643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>People with spinal cord injury (PwSCI) can experience life changes, including impacts on their physical and mental health. PwSCI often report less life satisfaction and lower subjective well-being than peers without SCI. These challenges and adversities increase the demand on them to be more resilient. Healthcare providers need quick and valid instruments to assess adult patients' resilience in clinical settings. We aimed to validate the factor validity and discrimination ability of a resilience scale, CD-RISC-10, for clinical usage in adults with SCI during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>93 adults with SCI responded to the self-reported survey, including CD-RISC-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scale (PHQ-9), the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and the Intrinsic Spirituality Scale. We conducted descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and item response theory (IRT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two items were deleted from CD-RISC-10 after EFA, forming CD-RISC-8. The item discriminations of the remaining eight items from the unconstrained IRT model ranged from a high of 3.071 to a relatively low 1.433. CD-RISC-8 is significantly related to PHQ-9 and SWLS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The factor validity of the CD-RISC-8 was improved. Significantly, the CD-RISC-8 has excellent potential for clinical usage due to its discriminant ability between low and intermediate resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5633-5639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2308643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: People with spinal cord injury (PwSCI) can experience life changes, including impacts on their physical and mental health. PwSCI often report less life satisfaction and lower subjective well-being than peers without SCI. These challenges and adversities increase the demand on them to be more resilient. Healthcare providers need quick and valid instruments to assess adult patients' resilience in clinical settings. We aimed to validate the factor validity and discrimination ability of a resilience scale, CD-RISC-10, for clinical usage in adults with SCI during hospitalization.

Materials and methods: 93 adults with SCI responded to the self-reported survey, including CD-RISC-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scale (PHQ-9), the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and the Intrinsic Spirituality Scale. We conducted descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and item response theory (IRT).

Results: Two items were deleted from CD-RISC-10 after EFA, forming CD-RISC-8. The item discriminations of the remaining eight items from the unconstrained IRT model ranged from a high of 3.071 to a relatively low 1.433. CD-RISC-8 is significantly related to PHQ-9 and SWLS.

Conclusions: The factor validity of the CD-RISC-8 was improved. Significantly, the CD-RISC-8 has excellent potential for clinical usage due to its discriminant ability between low and intermediate resilience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证康复医院脊髓损伤住院患者的八项复原力量表:探索性因素分析和项目反应理论。
目的:脊髓损伤患者(PwSCI)会经历生活上的变化,包括对其身心健康的影响。与没有脊髓损伤的同龄人相比,脊髓损伤患者的生活满意度和主观幸福感通常较低。这些挑战和逆境增加了对他们复原能力的要求。医疗服务提供者需要快速有效的工具来评估成年患者在临床环境中的抗逆能力。我们的目的是验证抗逆力量表 CD-RISC-10 的因子效度和区分能力,以便在临床上用于住院期间的成年 SCI 患者。材料和方法:93 名成年 SCI 患者回答了自我报告调查,包括 CD-RISC-10、患者健康问卷-9 量表 (PHQ-9)、生活满意度量表 (SWLS) 和内在灵性量表。我们进行了描述性统计、探索性因素分析(EFA)和项目反应理论(IRT):结果:经过 EFA 分析,CD-RISC-10 中删除了两个项目,形成了 CD-RISC-8。在无约束 IRT 模型中,其余 8 个项目的项目区分度从最高的 3.071 到相对较低的 1.433 不等。CD-RISC-8与PHQ-9和SWLS有明显的相关性:结论:CD-RISC-8 的因子效度有所提高。结论:CD-RISC-8 的因子效度得到了提高。值得注意的是,CD-RISC-8 在低度和中度复原力之间具有很强的区分能力,因此具有很好的临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
"More than effort, it's dedicating time and perseverance." experiences of physical activity and physical exercise in stroke survivor with high functional capacity: a qualitative study. Development and validation of an observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention. Exploring perspectives on implementing the World Health Assembly's Resolution for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems in Switzerland: a representative rehabilitation stakeholder survey. The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Understanding loneliness and its correlates among people with spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1