Understanding loneliness and its correlates among people with spinal cord injury.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2428822
Susan Robinson-Whelen, Rosemary B Hughes, Heather B Taylor, Sally A Holmes, Jessica Rodriguez, Kristen A Staggers, Charles G Minard
{"title":"Understanding loneliness and its correlates among people with spinal cord injury.","authors":"Susan Robinson-Whelen, Rosemary B Hughes, Heather B Taylor, Sally A Holmes, Jessica Rodriguez, Kristen A Staggers, Charles G Minard","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2428822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To conduct the first known comprehensive examination of loneliness and its correlates in a diverse sample of people with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional sample of 343 people with SCI provided responses to the 20-item UCLA Loneliness Scale-Version 3. We examined the relation of loneliness to measures of demographic, disability, physical health, and social characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (56%) of respondents had scores indicating high levels of loneliness. At least a quarter of respondents indicated that they <i>often</i> felt alone, left out, isolated, and lacking in companionship. At least a quarter <i>rarely or never</i> felt there were people who really understood them, with whom they could talk, and with whom they had a lot in common. In univariate analyses, loneliness was associated with several demographic, disability, and health characteristics suggesting potential risk factors. In multiple regression analyses, social characteristics (social integration, social support, satisfaction with social roles) were the most strongly associated with loneliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the high prevalence of loneliness among people with SCI. Given the adverse health consequences of loneliness documented in the general literature, there is an urgent need for researchers, healthcare providers, and policy makers to address the loneliness crisis in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2428822","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct the first known comprehensive examination of loneliness and its correlates in a diverse sample of people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods: A cross-sectional sample of 343 people with SCI provided responses to the 20-item UCLA Loneliness Scale-Version 3. We examined the relation of loneliness to measures of demographic, disability, physical health, and social characteristics.

Results: The majority (56%) of respondents had scores indicating high levels of loneliness. At least a quarter of respondents indicated that they often felt alone, left out, isolated, and lacking in companionship. At least a quarter rarely or never felt there were people who really understood them, with whom they could talk, and with whom they had a lot in common. In univariate analyses, loneliness was associated with several demographic, disability, and health characteristics suggesting potential risk factors. In multiple regression analyses, social characteristics (social integration, social support, satisfaction with social roles) were the most strongly associated with loneliness.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore the high prevalence of loneliness among people with SCI. Given the adverse health consequences of loneliness documented in the general literature, there is an urgent need for researchers, healthcare providers, and policy makers to address the loneliness crisis in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解脊髓损伤患者的孤独感及其相关因素。
目的:首次对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的孤独感及其相关因素进行全面研究:方法:343 名脊髓损伤患者对 20 个项目的加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表第 3 版进行了横断面抽样调查。我们研究了孤独感与人口统计学、残疾、身体健康和社会特征的关系:大多数受访者(56%)的得分表明孤独感较强。至少四分之一的受访者表示,他们经常感到孤独、被冷落、孤立和缺少陪伴。至少有四分之一的受访者很少或从未感觉到有真正理解他们的人,他们可以与这些人交谈,而且他们与这些人有很多共同之处。在单变量分析中,孤独感与一些人口、残疾和健康特征相关,这些特征暗示了潜在的风险因素。在多元回归分析中,社会特征(社会融合、社会支持、对社会角色的满意度)与孤独感的关系最为密切:我们的研究结果表明,孤独感在 SCI 患者中非常普遍。鉴于一般文献中记载的孤独对健康造成的不良后果,研究人员、医疗保健提供者和政策制定者迫切需要解决这一人群的孤独危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
"More than effort, it's dedicating time and perseverance." experiences of physical activity and physical exercise in stroke survivor with high functional capacity: a qualitative study. Development and validation of an observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention. Exploring perspectives on implementing the World Health Assembly's Resolution for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems in Switzerland: a representative rehabilitation stakeholder survey. The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Understanding loneliness and its correlates among people with spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1