Incidence of Pest and Natural Enemies in Direct Seeded Rice and Transplanted Rice

IF 1.2 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES National Academy Science Letters Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s40009-023-01380-2
Vinod K. Padala, Y. N. Venkatesh, S. Rajna, N. Ramya, Subhash Chander
{"title":"Incidence of Pest and Natural Enemies in Direct Seeded Rice and Transplanted Rice","authors":"Vinod K. Padala,&nbsp;Y. N. Venkatesh,&nbsp;S. Rajna,&nbsp;N. Ramya,&nbsp;Subhash Chander","doi":"10.1007/s40009-023-01380-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Direct seeded rice (DSR) has several economic and environmental benefits over transplanted rice (TPR), such as ease of planting, less water and labour requirement, short crop period, and reduced methane emission. We studied the incidence of pests: brown plant hopper (BPH), white-backed planthopper (WBPH)<i>,</i> leaf folder, whorl maggot, yellow stem borer, and natural enemies like spiders and rove beetles in rice under direct seeded and transplanting methods. Results indicated a significantly higher incidence of BPH and WBPH in TPR (4.81 ± 0.66; 0.24 ± 0.04 respectively) compared to DSR (3.22 ± 0.41; 0.006 ± 0.004 respectively). While the overall percent of leaf folder damage was significantly higher in TPR (1.01 ± 0.12), the percentage of white ears was high in DSR (2.83%) compared to TPR (1.87%). However, no significant difference was observed in the whorl maggot damage and natural enemy populations: spiders and rove beetles. The study also revealed a significantly higher yield in TPR (35.06 q/ha) than in DSR (31.13 q/ha). Our findings highlight the varying pest incidence in TPR and DSR with respect to pest species and emphasize the importance of management practices in DSR to maximize yield.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":717,"journal":{"name":"National Academy Science Letters","volume":"47 5","pages":"467 - 470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Academy Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40009-023-01380-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct seeded rice (DSR) has several economic and environmental benefits over transplanted rice (TPR), such as ease of planting, less water and labour requirement, short crop period, and reduced methane emission. We studied the incidence of pests: brown plant hopper (BPH), white-backed planthopper (WBPH), leaf folder, whorl maggot, yellow stem borer, and natural enemies like spiders and rove beetles in rice under direct seeded and transplanting methods. Results indicated a significantly higher incidence of BPH and WBPH in TPR (4.81 ± 0.66; 0.24 ± 0.04 respectively) compared to DSR (3.22 ± 0.41; 0.006 ± 0.004 respectively). While the overall percent of leaf folder damage was significantly higher in TPR (1.01 ± 0.12), the percentage of white ears was high in DSR (2.83%) compared to TPR (1.87%). However, no significant difference was observed in the whorl maggot damage and natural enemy populations: spiders and rove beetles. The study also revealed a significantly higher yield in TPR (35.06 q/ha) than in DSR (31.13 q/ha). Our findings highlight the varying pest incidence in TPR and DSR with respect to pest species and emphasize the importance of management practices in DSR to maximize yield.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直播稻和移栽稻的害虫和天敌发生率
与移栽水稻(TPR)相比,直播水稻(DSR)具有多种经济和环境效益,例如易于种植、所需水和劳动力较少、作物生长期较短以及甲烷排放量较低。我们研究了直播法和移栽法水稻的害虫发生率:褐跳甲(BPH)、白背飞虱(WBPH)、卷叶虫、轮蛆、黄螟,以及天敌蜘蛛和啮小蠹。结果表明,与 DSR(分别为 3.22 ± 0.41;0.006 ± 0.004)相比,TPR 的 BPH 和 WBPH 发生率明显更高(分别为 4.81 ± 0.66;0.24 ± 0.04)。虽然 TPR 的叶片折损率(1.01 ± 0.12)明显较高,但与 TPR(1.87%)相比,DSR 的白穗率(2.83%)较高。然而,在穗蛆危害和天敌数量(蜘蛛和啮齿目甲虫)方面没有观察到明显差异。研究还显示,TPR 的产量(35.06 q/ha)明显高于 DSR(31.13 q/ha)。我们的研究结果突出表明,在害虫种类方面,TPR 和 DSR 的害虫发生率各不相同,并强调了在 DSR 中采取管理措施以最大限度提高产量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
National Academy Science Letters
National Academy Science Letters 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The National Academy Science Letters is published by the National Academy of Sciences, India, since 1978. The publication of this unique journal was started with a view to give quick and wide publicity to the innovations in all fields of science
期刊最新文献
On the Modeling of Two Covid-19 Data Sets Using a Generalized Log-Exponential Transformed Distribution Hypoestes phyllostachya Baker: A New Record of Invasive Alien Plant Species from Uttarakhand, India Comparison of Different Signal Peptide Targeting EGFP Translocation Periplasm in Salmonella Bistorta coriacea (Sam.) Yonek. & H.Ohashi (Polygonaceae): An Addition to the Angiospermic Flora of India Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia solanacearum: A Potential Threat to Brinjal Cultivated in Sikkim, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1