Implementacja zasad ONZ dotyczących skutecznego przesłuchania i przesłuchiwania – perspektywy dla Polski i Litwy (COST Action CA22128: IMPLEMENDEZ)

Denis Solodov, Ilona Laurinaitytė
{"title":"Implementacja zasad ONZ dotyczących skutecznego przesłuchania i przesłuchiwania – perspektywy dla Polski i Litwy (COST Action CA22128: IMPLEMENDEZ)","authors":"Denis Solodov, Ilona Laurinaitytė","doi":"10.31648/sp.9759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies show that in criminal cases, most evidence is obtained through interviews and interrogations. Effective interviewing tactics, therefore, should be seen as an essential component of legal education, education and training of police officers and other law enforcement personnel. The Méndez Principles on effective interviewing and interrogation adopted in 2021 under the auspices of the United Nations offer an alternative to coercive, deceptive and confession-based interviewing and interrogation techniques. Grounded in extensive empirical and scientific research, the Principles promote rapport-based communication and the model of the investigative interview. In the article, the authors analyse these principles considering the existing legal framework and recommendations of European criminalistics. The primary objective is to identify the advantages of the implementation of the new model within the context of Polish and Lithuanian criminal proceedings. Potential challenges that might arise during the implementation process are also highlighted and analysed.","PeriodicalId":22052,"journal":{"name":"Studia Prawnoustrojowe","volume":"53 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Prawnoustrojowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31648/sp.9759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies show that in criminal cases, most evidence is obtained through interviews and interrogations. Effective interviewing tactics, therefore, should be seen as an essential component of legal education, education and training of police officers and other law enforcement personnel. The Méndez Principles on effective interviewing and interrogation adopted in 2021 under the auspices of the United Nations offer an alternative to coercive, deceptive and confession-based interviewing and interrogation techniques. Grounded in extensive empirical and scientific research, the Principles promote rapport-based communication and the model of the investigative interview. In the article, the authors analyse these principles considering the existing legal framework and recommendations of European criminalistics. The primary objective is to identify the advantages of the implementation of the new model within the context of Polish and Lithuanian criminal proceedings. Potential challenges that might arise during the implementation process are also highlighted and analysed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施联合国关于有效审讯和讯问的原则--波兰和立陶宛的前景(COST 行动 CA22128:IMPLEMENDEZ)
研究表明,在刑事案件中,大多数证据都是通过面谈和审讯获得的。因此,有效的面谈策略应被视为警官和其他执法人员法律教育、教育和培训的重要组成部分。2021 年在联合国主持下通过的关于有效面谈和讯问的《门德斯原则》为胁迫性、欺骗性和基于供词的面谈和讯问技巧提供了替代方案。这些原则以广泛的实证研究和科学研究为基础,提倡基于融洽关系的沟通和调查性面谈模式。在文章中,作者分析了这些原则,并考虑了现有的法律框架和欧洲犯罪学的建议。主要目的是确定在波兰和立陶宛刑事诉讼中实施新模式的优势。文章还强调并分析了实施过程中可能出现的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mediation in administrative law – Polish regulations in the light of the European recommendations Glosa do wyroku Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka z 9 marca 2023 r. w sprawie Cupiał v. Polska, skarga nr 67414/11 (aprobująca) Podstawy prawne funkcjonowania izb obrachunkowych w Polsce i we Francji. Wybrane aspekty prawnoporównawcze BRICS i BRICS+ a Światowa Organizacja Podatkowa Standardy praw człowieka w zakresie autopsji i ekshumacji – refleksje na gruncie prawa i praktyki Rady Europy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1