Theory on Stage: The Paradox of Anthropocene Spectatorship in Latour and Aït-Touati’s Inside and Moving Earths

Liliane Campos
{"title":"Theory on Stage: The Paradox of Anthropocene Spectatorship in Latour and Aït-Touati’s Inside and Moving Earths","authors":"Liliane Campos","doi":"10.5325/tpnc.1.1.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines the epistemological dimension of spectatorship in two lecture performances created by philosopher Bruno Latour and theater director Frédérique Aït-Touati. Inside (2016) and Moving Earths (2019) invite their audiences to question how they view the Earth, and to explore new visualizations that may foster political awareness of a “new climate regime.” The scenography and dramaturgy of these lectures perform the disruptions of perspective brought about by Gaia theory, in which the observer must perceive herself as part of an entangled Earth system. The article argues that despite this emphasis on entanglement, the philosopher on stage still functions as a figure of distanced theoretical spectatorship. The resulting tension between the lecture format and its philosophical content highlights the difficult position of the Anthropocene spectator, for whom totalizing, distanced views are both a necessity and a trap.","PeriodicalId":517452,"journal":{"name":"Theatre and Performance Notes and Counternotes","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theatre and Performance Notes and Counternotes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/tpnc.1.1.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the epistemological dimension of spectatorship in two lecture performances created by philosopher Bruno Latour and theater director Frédérique Aït-Touati. Inside (2016) and Moving Earths (2019) invite their audiences to question how they view the Earth, and to explore new visualizations that may foster political awareness of a “new climate regime.” The scenography and dramaturgy of these lectures perform the disruptions of perspective brought about by Gaia theory, in which the observer must perceive herself as part of an entangled Earth system. The article argues that despite this emphasis on entanglement, the philosopher on stage still functions as a figure of distanced theoretical spectatorship. The resulting tension between the lecture format and its philosophical content highlights the difficult position of the Anthropocene spectator, for whom totalizing, distanced views are both a necessity and a trap.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舞台上的理论:拉图尔和艾特-图阿蒂的《地球内部》和《移动的地球》中的人类世观众悖论
本文探讨了哲学家布鲁诺-拉图尔(Bruno Latour)和戏剧导演弗雷德里克-艾特-图瓦蒂(Frédérique Aït-Touati)创作的两场演讲表演中观众的认识论维度。Inside》(2016 年)和《Moving Earths》(2019 年)邀请观众质疑他们是如何看待地球的,并探索新的可视化方式,从而培养对 "新气候机制 "的政治意识。这些讲座的场景设计和戏剧表演表现了盖娅理论带来的视角混乱,观察者必须将自己视为纠缠在一起的地球系统的一部分。文章认为,尽管强调纠缠,但舞台上的哲学家仍然是一个有距离感的理论旁观者形象。由此产生的讲座形式与哲学内容之间的张力凸显了人类世观众的艰难处境,对他们而言,全面化、有距离感的观点既是必要的,也是陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theory on Stage: The Paradox of Anthropocene Spectatorship in Latour and Aït-Touati’s Inside and Moving Earths Degradation in Hypermasculine Cultures of Disposability and Forgetfulness: Nikolai Kolyada’s Ekaterinburg Theatre A Multi-Point Call to Action for Diversifying Student Enrollment in Theatre Programs: The Framework for Providing Pathways Toward Building an Inclusive Culture Meet My Gaze: Crafting the Agentic Gaze for Zoom Theatre A Response to Steven Urkowitz and Michael J. Hirrel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1