{"title":"Longitudinal reciprocal relationships among mastery goals, autonomous motivation, and motivation instability","authors":"Takatoyo Umemoto, Tsutomu Inagaki","doi":"10.1007/s12564-024-09952-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we examined the longitudinal reciprocal relationships among mastery goals, autonomous motivation, and motivation instability. In the hierarchical model of motivation, mastery goal for overall course subject learning has been positioned at the contextual level, while autonomous motivation and motivation instability during a specific class session were positioned at the situational level. A longitudinal online survey of university students in five asynchronous online classes at a Japanese university was conducted at three time points in one semester. A total of 218 university students participated in the study. A cross-lagged panel model was constructed and analyzed by structural equation modeling. The results showed that the mastery goal at Time 1 was positively associated with autonomous motivation at Time 2. In addition, the mastery goal at Time 2 was positively associated with autonomous motivation at Time 3 and negatively associated with motivation instability at Time 3. These results indicate a top-down effect of mastery goal at the contextual level on situational motivation, which is located lower in the hierarchical model. Furthermore, autonomous motivation at Time 2 was positively associated with the mastery goal at Time 3. This indicates a bottom-up effect, in which contextual motivation, which is located higher in the hierarchical model, can be altered by situational motivation in the classroom. The results of the study clearly show a longitudinal reciprocal relationship between contextual level motivation and situational level motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47344,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09952-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, we examined the longitudinal reciprocal relationships among mastery goals, autonomous motivation, and motivation instability. In the hierarchical model of motivation, mastery goal for overall course subject learning has been positioned at the contextual level, while autonomous motivation and motivation instability during a specific class session were positioned at the situational level. A longitudinal online survey of university students in five asynchronous online classes at a Japanese university was conducted at three time points in one semester. A total of 218 university students participated in the study. A cross-lagged panel model was constructed and analyzed by structural equation modeling. The results showed that the mastery goal at Time 1 was positively associated with autonomous motivation at Time 2. In addition, the mastery goal at Time 2 was positively associated with autonomous motivation at Time 3 and negatively associated with motivation instability at Time 3. These results indicate a top-down effect of mastery goal at the contextual level on situational motivation, which is located lower in the hierarchical model. Furthermore, autonomous motivation at Time 2 was positively associated with the mastery goal at Time 3. This indicates a bottom-up effect, in which contextual motivation, which is located higher in the hierarchical model, can be altered by situational motivation in the classroom. The results of the study clearly show a longitudinal reciprocal relationship between contextual level motivation and situational level motivation.
期刊介绍:
The Asia Pacific Education Review (APER) aims to stimulate research, encourage academic exchange, and enhance the professional development of scholars and other researchers who are interested in educational and cultural issues in the Asia Pacific region. APER covers all areas of educational research, with a focus on cross-cultural, comparative and other studies with a broad Asia-Pacific context.
APER is a peer reviewed journal produced by the Education Research Institute at Seoul National University. It was founded by the Institute of Asia Pacific Education Development, Seoul National University in 2000, which is owned and operated by Education Research Institute at Seoul National University since 2003.
APER requires all submitted manuscripts to follow the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA; http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx).