Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Automated Detection of Mri Brain Tumors

Umar S. Alqasemi, Sultan A. Almutawa, Shadi M. Obaid
{"title":"Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Automated Detection of Mri Brain Tumors","authors":"Umar S. Alqasemi, Sultan A. Almutawa, Shadi M. Obaid","doi":"10.35940/ijeat.c4360.13030224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detection and classification of brain tumors in manual or traditional way is an area which could be improved by having such automated detection and clarification system for brain tumors. In this paper, enhanced Computer-Aided Diagnosis CAD software system is introduced for brain tumor detection and classification. Total of 229 brain MRI images was taken as dataset for the purpose of this research; those dataset images include 105 normal brain MRI images, and 124 abnormal brain MRI images. Proposed CAD system is specialized for Meningioma brain tumor detection and classification, and the technique could be generalized and implemented for Glioma, and Pituitary brain tumors as well, and the whole system was implemented using MATLAB software. We started by cropping the region of interest (ROI) of dataset images. Then, feature extraction was implemented using first order statistical features, as well as using of some wavelets filters in combination with the former. T-test is used to exclude features of no statistical significance (p-value < 0.05). After that, different types of classifiers were used to separate the normal set from the abnormal one. Note that, we used an iterative approach to by changing features with many runs until we got best performance, where, best accuracy results were gotten with SVM-Kernel Function (Linear), KNN-1, KNN-3, and KNN-5 classifiers. Note also that, we used convolutional neural networks (CNN) from Deep Learning toolbox of MATLAB as a control method to compare, where the images were fed directly to the CNN. The results were evaluated using performance assessment techniques which are Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), Accuracy, Error Rate, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Reciever Operator Characteristic (ROC). With SVM classifier, the best gotten accuracy results were 91 % with CNN classifier, 82% with SVM classifier, and 77 % with KNN classifier. Furthermore, it was very beneficial to find such feature extraction techniques which gave acceptable accuracy results with three different classifiers; this was the case two times as mentioned the study. All proposed CAD system areas was developed and implemented using MATLAB software.","PeriodicalId":13981,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.c4360.13030224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detection and classification of brain tumors in manual or traditional way is an area which could be improved by having such automated detection and clarification system for brain tumors. In this paper, enhanced Computer-Aided Diagnosis CAD software system is introduced for brain tumor detection and classification. Total of 229 brain MRI images was taken as dataset for the purpose of this research; those dataset images include 105 normal brain MRI images, and 124 abnormal brain MRI images. Proposed CAD system is specialized for Meningioma brain tumor detection and classification, and the technique could be generalized and implemented for Glioma, and Pituitary brain tumors as well, and the whole system was implemented using MATLAB software. We started by cropping the region of interest (ROI) of dataset images. Then, feature extraction was implemented using first order statistical features, as well as using of some wavelets filters in combination with the former. T-test is used to exclude features of no statistical significance (p-value < 0.05). After that, different types of classifiers were used to separate the normal set from the abnormal one. Note that, we used an iterative approach to by changing features with many runs until we got best performance, where, best accuracy results were gotten with SVM-Kernel Function (Linear), KNN-1, KNN-3, and KNN-5 classifiers. Note also that, we used convolutional neural networks (CNN) from Deep Learning toolbox of MATLAB as a control method to compare, where the images were fed directly to the CNN. The results were evaluated using performance assessment techniques which are Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), Accuracy, Error Rate, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Reciever Operator Characteristic (ROC). With SVM classifier, the best gotten accuracy results were 91 % with CNN classifier, 82% with SVM classifier, and 77 % with KNN classifier. Furthermore, it was very beneficial to find such feature extraction techniques which gave acceptable accuracy results with three different classifiers; this was the case two times as mentioned the study. All proposed CAD system areas was developed and implemented using MATLAB software.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动检测 Mri 脑肿瘤的计算机辅助诊断系统
通过人工或传统方式对脑肿瘤进行检测和分类是一个可以通过脑肿瘤自动检测和澄清系统加以改进的领域。本文介绍了用于脑肿瘤检测和分类的增强型计算机辅助诊断 CAD 软件系统。本研究共使用了 229 张脑部核磁共振成像图像作为数据集,其中包括 105 张正常脑部核磁共振成像图像和 124 张异常脑部核磁共振成像图像。所提出的 CAD 系统专门用于脑膜瘤的检测和分类,该技术也可用于胶质瘤和脑垂体瘤的检测和分类,整个系统使用 MATLAB 软件实现。我们首先裁剪了数据集图像的感兴趣区域(ROI)。然后,使用一阶统计特征进行特征提取,并结合前者使用一些小波滤波器。使用 T 检验排除无统计学意义(P 值小于 0.05)的特征。然后,使用不同类型的分类器将正常集与异常集区分开来。请注意,我们采用了迭代法,通过多次运行改变特征,直到获得最佳性能,其中,SVM-核函数(线性)、KNN-1、KNN-3 和 KNN-5 分类器的准确率最高。此外,我们还使用了 MATLAB 深度学习工具箱中的卷积神经网络(CNN)作为控制方法进行比较,将图像直接输入 CNN。我们使用灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、准确度、错误率和收敛操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)等性能评估技术对结果进行了评估。在 SVM 分类器中,CNN 分类器的准确率为 91%,SVM 分类器的准确率为 82%,KNN 分类器的准确率为 77%。此外,找到这样的特征提取技术是非常有益的,它能用三种不同的分类器给出可接受的准确度结果;正如研究中提到的,这种情况出现过两次。所有提议的 CAD 系统领域都是使用 MATLAB 软件开发和实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Car Door Sound Quality Assessment - A Review for NVH Performance Research Airport Runway Crack Detection to Classify and Densify Surface Crack Type Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Automated Detection of Mri Brain Tumors Smart Artificial Intelligence System for Heart Disease Prediction A Comprehensive Study on Failure Modes and Mechanisms of Thin Film Chip Resistors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1