Congestion Number Analysis of Cross-Flow Dynamics: Experimental Data and Simulations

F. Zanlungo, Zeynep Yucel, Claudio Feliciani, K. Nishinari, Takayuki Kanda
{"title":"Congestion Number Analysis of Cross-Flow Dynamics: Experimental Data and Simulations","authors":"F. Zanlungo, Zeynep Yucel, Claudio Feliciani, K. Nishinari, Takayuki Kanda","doi":"10.17815/cd.2024.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We recently proposed the \"Congestion Number\" (CN) as a metricto evaluate the state of a pedestrian crowd. Such metric, whose definition is based on the gradient of the rotor of the crowd velocity field, appears to provide additional information with respect to traditional metrics based on pedestrian density and flow.\nWe also published two works on the dynamics of orthogonally crossing pedestrian flows under different density regimes. In the first manuscript we analysed experimental data by using traditionalobservables such as density, velocity and relative position between pedestrians, along with less explored ones such as body orientation. In the second one we proposed a hierarchy of simulation models to reproduce the cross-flow dynamics, and used the aforementioned observables to compare such models.\nBased on theoretical considerations and analysis of real world data, we believe the crossing flow setting to be a good arena to test the CN metric, and in this work we perform a CN analysis on the empirical and simulation data. Results show that simulation models, which reproduced almost perfectly the density time dependence of the pedestrian crowd, fail to reproduce the CN one. Actually, models \"outperform\" the pedestrian crowd when analysed using CN. These preliminary results suggest that the CN metric may provide useful information not only in crowd assessment but also in model evaluation.","PeriodicalId":93276,"journal":{"name":"Collective dynamics","volume":"65 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collective dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17815/cd.2024.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We recently proposed the "Congestion Number" (CN) as a metricto evaluate the state of a pedestrian crowd. Such metric, whose definition is based on the gradient of the rotor of the crowd velocity field, appears to provide additional information with respect to traditional metrics based on pedestrian density and flow. We also published two works on the dynamics of orthogonally crossing pedestrian flows under different density regimes. In the first manuscript we analysed experimental data by using traditionalobservables such as density, velocity and relative position between pedestrians, along with less explored ones such as body orientation. In the second one we proposed a hierarchy of simulation models to reproduce the cross-flow dynamics, and used the aforementioned observables to compare such models. Based on theoretical considerations and analysis of real world data, we believe the crossing flow setting to be a good arena to test the CN metric, and in this work we perform a CN analysis on the empirical and simulation data. Results show that simulation models, which reproduced almost perfectly the density time dependence of the pedestrian crowd, fail to reproduce the CN one. Actually, models "outperform" the pedestrian crowd when analysed using CN. These preliminary results suggest that the CN metric may provide useful information not only in crowd assessment but also in model evaluation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交叉流动态拥塞数分析:实验数据与模拟
我们最近提出了 "拥堵数"(CN)作为评估行人群状态的指标。这种度量的定义基于人群速度场转子的梯度,与基于行人密度和流量的传统度量相比,似乎能提供更多信息。我们还发表了两篇关于不同密度下正交行人流动态的文章。在第一篇手稿中,我们利用行人之间的密度、速度和相对位置等传统观测数据,以及身体方向等较少探索的观测数据,对实验数据进行了分析。基于理论考虑和对现实世界数据的分析,我们认为交叉流环境是测试 CN 指标的良好舞台,在这项工作中,我们对经验数据和模拟数据进行了 CN 分析。结果表明,模拟模型几乎完美地再现了行人群的密度时间依赖性,但却无法再现 CN 模型。实际上,在使用 CN 进行分析时,模型 "优于 "行人群。这些初步结果表明,CN 指标不仅可为人群评估提供有用信息,还可为模型评估提供有用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improving Pedestrian Dynamics Predictions Using Neighboring Factors Evaluation of Data Fitting Approaches for Speed/Flow Density Relationships Numerical and Theoretical Analysis of a New One-Dimensional Cellular Automaton Model for Bidirectional Flows Are Depth Field Cameras Preserving Anonymity? Pilot Study of Mental Simulation of People Movement During Evacuations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1