Do higher government spending, financial development, and trade reduce income inequality in low-income countries? A Bayesian perspective

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1111/polp.12600
Mwoya Byaro, Nicholaus Ngowi, Anicet Rwezaula
{"title":"Do higher government spending, financial development, and trade reduce income inequality in low-income countries? A Bayesian perspective","authors":"Mwoya Byaro,&nbsp;Nicholaus Ngowi,&nbsp;Anicet Rwezaula","doi":"10.1111/polp.12600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>We employed the Bayesian method to investigate the impact of government spending, financial development (measured by bank credit), and trade on income inequality reduction in 66 low-income countries (LICs) across Africa, Asia, America, and Europe from 2000 to 2018. Controlling inflation and unemployment, our results indicate that trade and inflation exacerbate income inequality in LICs, while financial development and government spending have no impact on reducing income inequality in these countries. Furthermore, the findings show that real GDP per capita reduces income inequality in LICs. To ensure the robustness of our results, we also conducted frequentist quantile regression, which yielded consistent findings that financial development, government spending, and trade do not reduce income inequality in LICs. We further discuss the potential channels through which trade, financial development, inflation, and government spending contribute to income inequality in LICs, and provide policy implications based on the empirical evidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Adegboye, Alex, Kofo Adegboye, Uwalomwa Uwuigbe, Stephen Ojeka, and Eyitemi Fasanu. 2023. “Taxation, Democracy, and Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Relevant Linkages for Sustainable Development Goals.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51(4): 696–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12547.</p>\n \n <p>Asongu, Simplice, and Nicholas M. Odhiambo. 2023. “The Effect of Inequality on Poverty and Severity of Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Role of Financial Development Institutions.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51(5): 898–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12558.</p>\n \n <p>Polacko, Matthew. 2023. “Turning Off the Base: Social Democracy's Neoliberal Turn, Income Inequality, and Turnout.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51(4): 538–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12550.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"52 3","pages":"500-519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We employed the Bayesian method to investigate the impact of government spending, financial development (measured by bank credit), and trade on income inequality reduction in 66 low-income countries (LICs) across Africa, Asia, America, and Europe from 2000 to 2018. Controlling inflation and unemployment, our results indicate that trade and inflation exacerbate income inequality in LICs, while financial development and government spending have no impact on reducing income inequality in these countries. Furthermore, the findings show that real GDP per capita reduces income inequality in LICs. To ensure the robustness of our results, we also conducted frequentist quantile regression, which yielded consistent findings that financial development, government spending, and trade do not reduce income inequality in LICs. We further discuss the potential channels through which trade, financial development, inflation, and government spending contribute to income inequality in LICs, and provide policy implications based on the empirical evidence.

Related Articles

Adegboye, Alex, Kofo Adegboye, Uwalomwa Uwuigbe, Stephen Ojeka, and Eyitemi Fasanu. 2023. “Taxation, Democracy, and Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Relevant Linkages for Sustainable Development Goals.” Politics & Policy 51(4): 696–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12547.

Asongu, Simplice, and Nicholas M. Odhiambo. 2023. “The Effect of Inequality on Poverty and Severity of Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Role of Financial Development Institutions.” Politics & Policy 51(5): 898–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12558.

Polacko, Matthew. 2023. “Turning Off the Base: Social Democracy's Neoliberal Turn, Income Inequality, and Turnout.” Politics & Policy 51(4): 538–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12550.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高政府支出、金融发展和贸易是否会减少低收入国家的收入不平等?贝叶斯视角
我们采用贝叶斯方法研究了 2000 年至 2018 年期间政府支出、金融发展(以银行信贷衡量)和贸易对非洲、亚洲、美洲和欧洲 66 个低收入国家减少收入不平等的影响。在控制通货膨胀和失业率的情况下,我们的研究结果表明,贸易和通货膨胀加剧了低收入国家的收入不平等,而金融发展和政府支出对减少这些国家的收入不平等没有影响。此外,研究结果表明,实际人均国内生产总值减少了低收入国家的收入不平等。为了确保结果的稳健性,我们还进行了频数量化回归,结果发现金融发展、政府支出和贸易并没有减少低收入国家的收入不平等。我们进一步讨论了贸易、金融发展、通货膨胀和政府支出导致低收入国家收入不平等的潜在渠道,并根据经验证据提出了政策建议。2023."撒哈拉以南非洲的税收、民主和不平等:可持续发展目标的相关联系"。Politics & Policy 51(4):https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12547.Asongu, Simplice, and Nicholas M. Odhiambo.2023."撒哈拉以南非洲不平等对贫困和贫困严重程度的影响:金融发展机构的作用"。Politics & Policy 51(5):898–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12558.Polacko, Matthew.2023."Turning Off the Base:Social Democracy's Neoliberal Turn, Income Inequality, and Turnout." 《社会民主的新自由主义转向、收入不平等与投票率》。Politics & Policy 51(4):538–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12550.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Issue Information “Where you stand depends on where you sit”: The politics of petroleum pricing in Ghana's election cycle Note from the Editor and Acknowledgment of Reviewers 2023–2024 A paradox of public engagement: The discursive politics of environmental justice in Canada's Chemical Valley Democratic interventionists versus pragmatic realists: Employing the advocacy coalition framework to explain Obama's shift in multilateralism with European allies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1