{"title":"Policy Integration for Overcoming Fragmented Government Action in South Africa: The Case of the National Policy on Food and Nutrition Security","authors":"Guswin de Wee, Amina Jakoet-Salie","doi":"10.1111/polp.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>In South Africa, as globally, scholars in public policy, administration, and governance have acknowledged the necessity of integrated policy approaches to address complex, cross-sectoral, and multilevel government issues. However, the complex of problems and fragmented government structures and actions hinder effective policy implementation and governance. Despite the potential of policy integration to overcome these challenges, there has been little focus on the concept in South African literature, which is widespread in official speeches and documents by the government—a scholarship-practice mismatch. Using the case of the National Policy on Food Security and Nutrition Security, persistent fragmented government action was demonstrated using a policy integration analytical framework. The policy's ineffectiveness stems from a lack of coordination, decisional platforms, and stakeholder participation, with implications for governance. This article provides theoretical and practical insights for improving policy making, integration, decision making, and governance, and suggests research areas for South African Public Administration scholarship.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Asare-Nuamah, P., A. Amoah, and S. A. Asongu. 2023. “Achieving Food Security in Ghana: Does Governance Matter?” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 51, no. 4: 614–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12540.</p>\n \n <p>Djeufack Dongmo, A., and D. Avom. 2024. “Urbanization, Civil Conflict, and the Severity of Food Insecurity in Africa.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 52, no. 1: 140–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12572.</p>\n \n <p>Oehmke, J. F., S. L. Young, G. Bahiigwa, B. B. Keizire, and L. A. Post. 2018. “The Behavioral-Economics Basis of Mutual Accountability to Achieve Food Security.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 46, no. 1: 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12244.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.70018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In South Africa, as globally, scholars in public policy, administration, and governance have acknowledged the necessity of integrated policy approaches to address complex, cross-sectoral, and multilevel government issues. However, the complex of problems and fragmented government structures and actions hinder effective policy implementation and governance. Despite the potential of policy integration to overcome these challenges, there has been little focus on the concept in South African literature, which is widespread in official speeches and documents by the government—a scholarship-practice mismatch. Using the case of the National Policy on Food Security and Nutrition Security, persistent fragmented government action was demonstrated using a policy integration analytical framework. The policy's ineffectiveness stems from a lack of coordination, decisional platforms, and stakeholder participation, with implications for governance. This article provides theoretical and practical insights for improving policy making, integration, decision making, and governance, and suggests research areas for South African Public Administration scholarship.
Related Articles
Asare-Nuamah, P., A. Amoah, and S. A. Asongu. 2023. “Achieving Food Security in Ghana: Does Governance Matter?” Politics & Policy 51, no. 4: 614–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12540.
Djeufack Dongmo, A., and D. Avom. 2024. “Urbanization, Civil Conflict, and the Severity of Food Insecurity in Africa.” Politics & Policy 52, no. 1: 140–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12572.
Oehmke, J. F., S. L. Young, G. Bahiigwa, B. B. Keizire, and L. A. Post. 2018. “The Behavioral-Economics Basis of Mutual Accountability to Achieve Food Security.” Politics & Policy 46, no. 1: 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12244.
在南非,与全球一样,公共政策、行政和治理领域的学者已经认识到,有必要采用综合政策方法来解决复杂的、跨部门的、多层次的政府问题。然而,复杂的问题和分散的政府结构和行动阻碍了有效的政策执行和治理。尽管政策整合有可能克服这些挑战,但在南非文献中很少关注这一概念,这一概念在政府的官方演讲和文件中广泛存在——这是一种学术与实践的不匹配。以国家粮食安全和营养安全政策为例,使用政策整合分析框架展示了持续分散的政府行动。政策的无效源于缺乏协调、决策平台和利益相关者的参与,这对治理有影响。本文为改善政策制定、整合、决策和治理提供了理论和实践见解,并为南非公共管理学术提出了研究方向。相关文章陈晓明,陈晓明,陈晓明。2009。“在加纳实现粮食安全:治理重要吗?”政治,51号政策,不。4: 614 - 635。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12540。Djeufack Dongmo, A.和D. Avom. 2024。“非洲的城市化、国内冲突和粮食不安全的严重性。”政治,政策52,不。1: 140 - 168。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12572。欧姆克,J. F., S. L. Young, G. Bahiigwa, B. B. Keizire, L. A. Post. 2018。“实现粮食安全的相互问责的行为经济学基础”。政治,政策46,不。1: 32-57。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12244。