{"title":"Histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging: Correlation with molecular prognostic factors and combined subtypes of breast cancer","authors":"Dan Yang, Yike Ren, Chunhong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2024.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To look for links between diffusion and IVIM parameters and different molecular subtypes and prognostic factors through histogram analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of 139 patients with breast cancer who had pre-operative MRI examinations were enrolled in this retrospective study. Histograms of the diffusion and IVIM parameters were analyzed for the whole tumor, and an association was investigated between the parameters and the different molecular prognostic factors and subtypes using the nonparametric test, Spearman's rank correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The histogram metrics of the diffusion and IVIM parameters were significantly different for molecular prognostic factors such as human epidermal receptor factor-2 (HER2), progesterone receptor, estrogen receptor, and ki-67. All histogram metrics displayed a poor correlation with all groups (<em>r</em> = −0.28-0.29). There were significant differences in the histogram metrics for the Luminal B-HER2 (−) vs. HER2-positive (non-luminal) subtypes in the mean and 10th percentile D, with the area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.742 and 0.700, respectively, and for the Luminal A and HER2-positive (non-luminal) subtypes in the 90th percentile and entropy of D*, with AUCs of 0.769 and 0.727, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The histogram metrics of IVIM parameters exhibited links with breast cancer prognosis factors and combined subtypes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 210-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24001590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To look for links between diffusion and IVIM parameters and different molecular subtypes and prognostic factors through histogram analysis.
Materials and methods
A total of 139 patients with breast cancer who had pre-operative MRI examinations were enrolled in this retrospective study. Histograms of the diffusion and IVIM parameters were analyzed for the whole tumor, and an association was investigated between the parameters and the different molecular prognostic factors and subtypes using the nonparametric test, Spearman's rank correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results
The histogram metrics of the diffusion and IVIM parameters were significantly different for molecular prognostic factors such as human epidermal receptor factor-2 (HER2), progesterone receptor, estrogen receptor, and ki-67. All histogram metrics displayed a poor correlation with all groups (r = −0.28-0.29). There were significant differences in the histogram metrics for the Luminal B-HER2 (−) vs. HER2-positive (non-luminal) subtypes in the mean and 10th percentile D, with the area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.742 and 0.700, respectively, and for the Luminal A and HER2-positive (non-luminal) subtypes in the 90th percentile and entropy of D*, with AUCs of 0.769 and 0.727, respectively.
Conclusion
The histogram metrics of IVIM parameters exhibited links with breast cancer prognosis factors and combined subtypes.
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.