Understanding Crowd Responses to Perceived Hostile Threats: An Innovative Multidiscplinary Approach

Anne Templeton, M. Telga, E. Ronchi, F. Neville, Steve Reicher, John Drury
{"title":"Understanding Crowd Responses to Perceived Hostile Threats: An Innovative Multidiscplinary Approach","authors":"Anne Templeton, M. Telga, E. Ronchi, F. Neville, Steve Reicher, John Drury","doi":"10.17815/cd.2024.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People facing threat may evacuate, help others, share information, ignore the threat and the plight of others, or enact a combination of these behaviours. Accurate conceptual models of crowd behaviours must consider why and when these behaviours occur, as well as how people's responses may vary across different scenarios. Researchers have investigated crowd responses to threats using a variety of methods, such as interviews, observational analysis and virtual reality experiments. Each methodology offers benefits to understanding collective responses to threats, but each methodology also has limitations. Importantly, very little research has explored crowd responses in false alarm situations where crowd members misperceive that a threat exists. In this paper, we describe a new programme of work which combines approaches from safety engineering and crowd psychology to gain a thorough understanding of crowd behaviour in response to real and misperceived threats, and the processes underpinning the behaviour. We focus on how we identified and addressed the similarities and differences in our research questions, conceptual approaches to research, and methodological abilities. We demonstrate how our multidisciplinary approach provides a framework for combining diverse research methods that collectively build knowledge to create more accurate models of crowd responses to (mis)perceived threats.","PeriodicalId":93276,"journal":{"name":"Collective dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collective dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17815/cd.2024.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People facing threat may evacuate, help others, share information, ignore the threat and the plight of others, or enact a combination of these behaviours. Accurate conceptual models of crowd behaviours must consider why and when these behaviours occur, as well as how people's responses may vary across different scenarios. Researchers have investigated crowd responses to threats using a variety of methods, such as interviews, observational analysis and virtual reality experiments. Each methodology offers benefits to understanding collective responses to threats, but each methodology also has limitations. Importantly, very little research has explored crowd responses in false alarm situations where crowd members misperceive that a threat exists. In this paper, we describe a new programme of work which combines approaches from safety engineering and crowd psychology to gain a thorough understanding of crowd behaviour in response to real and misperceived threats, and the processes underpinning the behaviour. We focus on how we identified and addressed the similarities and differences in our research questions, conceptual approaches to research, and methodological abilities. We demonstrate how our multidisciplinary approach provides a framework for combining diverse research methods that collectively build knowledge to create more accurate models of crowd responses to (mis)perceived threats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解人群对敌意威胁的反应:创新的多学科方法
面临威胁的人们可能会撤离、帮助他人、分享信息、忽视威胁和他人的困境,或者做出这些行为的组合。准确的人群行为概念模型必须考虑这些行为发生的原因和时间,以及在不同情况下人们的反应会如何变化。研究人员采用访谈、观察分析和虚拟现实实验等多种方法调查了人群对威胁的反应。每种方法都能为理解集体对威胁的反应提供益处,但每种方法也都有局限性。重要的是,很少有研究探讨在虚假警报情况下的人群反应,即人群成员误认为存在威胁。在本文中,我们介绍了一项新的工作计划,该计划结合了安全工程和人群心理学的方法,以全面了解人群在应对真实和误认威胁时的行为,以及这些行为的基本过程。我们的重点是如何确定和解决我们在研究问题、研究概念方法和方法能力方面的异同。我们展示了我们的多学科方法如何提供一个框架,将不同的研究方法结合在一起,共同积累知识,从而创建更准确的人群应对(误)感知威胁的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improving Pedestrian Dynamics Predictions Using Neighboring Factors Evaluation of Data Fitting Approaches for Speed/Flow Density Relationships Numerical and Theoretical Analysis of a New One-Dimensional Cellular Automaton Model for Bidirectional Flows Are Depth Field Cameras Preserving Anonymity? Pilot Study of Mental Simulation of People Movement During Evacuations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1