Multi-model ensembles for regional and national wheat yield forecasts in Argentina

Maximilian Zachow, Harald Kunstmann, Daniel Miralles, S. Asseng
{"title":"Multi-model ensembles for regional and national wheat yield forecasts in Argentina","authors":"Maximilian Zachow, Harald Kunstmann, Daniel Miralles, S. Asseng","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ad627c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While multi-model ensembles (MMEs) of seasonal climate models (SCMs) have been used for crop yield forecasting, there has not been a systematic attempt to select the most skillful SCMs to optimize the performance of a MME and improve in-season yield forecasts. Here, we propose a statistical model to forecast regional and national wheat yield variability from 1993-2016 over the main wheat production area in Argentina. Monthly mean temperature and precipitation from the four months (Aug-Nov) before harvest were used as features. The model was validated for end-of-season estimation in December using reanalysis data (ERA) from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) as well as for in-season forecasts from June to November using a MME of three SCMs from 10 SCMs analyzed. A benchmark model for end-of-season yield estimation using ERA data achieved a R2 of 0.33, a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 9.8% and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) score of 0.8 on national level. On regional level, the model demonstrated the best estimation accuracy in the northern sub-humid Pampas with a R2 of 0.5, a RMSE of 12.6% and a ROC score of 0.9. Across all months of initialization, SCMs from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction, the National Center for Atmospheric Research and the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory had the highest mean absolute error of forecasted features compared to ERA data. The most skillful in-season wheat yield forecasts were possible with a 3-member-MME, combining data from the SCMs of the ECMWF, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the French national meteorological service. This MME forecasted wheat yield on national level at the beginning of November, one month before harvest, with a R2 of 0.32, a RMSE of 9.9% and a ROC score of 0.7. This approach can be applied to other crops and regions.","PeriodicalId":507917,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad627c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While multi-model ensembles (MMEs) of seasonal climate models (SCMs) have been used for crop yield forecasting, there has not been a systematic attempt to select the most skillful SCMs to optimize the performance of a MME and improve in-season yield forecasts. Here, we propose a statistical model to forecast regional and national wheat yield variability from 1993-2016 over the main wheat production area in Argentina. Monthly mean temperature and precipitation from the four months (Aug-Nov) before harvest were used as features. The model was validated for end-of-season estimation in December using reanalysis data (ERA) from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) as well as for in-season forecasts from June to November using a MME of three SCMs from 10 SCMs analyzed. A benchmark model for end-of-season yield estimation using ERA data achieved a R2 of 0.33, a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 9.8% and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) score of 0.8 on national level. On regional level, the model demonstrated the best estimation accuracy in the northern sub-humid Pampas with a R2 of 0.5, a RMSE of 12.6% and a ROC score of 0.9. Across all months of initialization, SCMs from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction, the National Center for Atmospheric Research and the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory had the highest mean absolute error of forecasted features compared to ERA data. The most skillful in-season wheat yield forecasts were possible with a 3-member-MME, combining data from the SCMs of the ECMWF, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the French national meteorological service. This MME forecasted wheat yield on national level at the beginning of November, one month before harvest, with a R2 of 0.32, a RMSE of 9.9% and a ROC score of 0.7. This approach can be applied to other crops and regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于阿根廷地区和全国小麦产量预测的多模型组合
虽然季节性气候模式(SCMs)的多模式集合(MMEs)已被用于作物产量预报,但目前还没有系统性的尝试来选择最熟练的 SCMs,以优化多模式集合的性能并改善季节性产量预报。在此,我们提出了一个统计模型,用于预测 1993-2016 年阿根廷小麦主产区的区域和全国小麦产量变化。该模型以收割前四个月(8 月至 11 月)的月平均气温和降水量为特征。利用欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)的再分析数据(ERA)对模型进行了 12 月季末估算验证,并利用分析的 10 个 SCM 中的 3 个 SCM 的 MME 对 6 月至 11 月的季内预测进行了验证。利用 ERA 数据进行季末产量估算的基准模型的 R2 值为 0.33,均方根误差 (RMSE) 为 9.8%,全国接收器操作特征 (ROC) 得分为 0.8。在地区层面,该模型在北部亚湿润潘帕斯地区的估计精度最高,R2 为 0.5,均方根误差为 12.6%,ROC 得分为 0.9。在初始化的所有月份中,国家环境预测中心、国家大气研究中心和地球物理流体动力学实验室的单因子模式与ERA数据相比,预测特征的平均绝对误差最大。结合 ECMWF、美国国家航空和航天局以及法国国家气象局的 SCMs 数据,3 个成员的 MME 可以最准确地预测小麦的当季产量。该 MME 可在 11 月初,即收获前一个月预测全国小麦产量,R2 为 0.32,RMSE 为 9.9%,ROC 为 0.7。这种方法可用于其他作物和地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Responsible carbon dioxide removals and the EU’s 2040 climate target State-of-the-art bias correction of climate models misrepresent climate science and misinform adaptation Conceptualising global cultural transformation – Developing deep institutional scenarios for whole of society change Reliability and resilience of environmental flows under uncertainty: reconsidering water year types and inconsistent flow requirements in California Unequal economic consequences of coastal hazards: Hurricane impacts on North Carolina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1