How climate change is impacting the Brazilian agricultural sector: Evidence from a systematic literature review

A. C. Fiorini, G. Angelkorte, Tamar Bakman, Luiz Bernardo Baptista, Talita Cruz, Fabio A. Diuana, Taísa Morais, Régis Rathmann, F. T. F. da Silva, Isabela Schmidt Tagomori, Marianne Zotin, André F. P. Lucena, A. Szklo, Roberto Schaeffer, J. Portugal-Pereira
{"title":"How climate change is impacting the Brazilian agricultural sector: Evidence from a systematic literature review","authors":"A. C. Fiorini, G. Angelkorte, Tamar Bakman, Luiz Bernardo Baptista, Talita Cruz, Fabio A. Diuana, Taísa Morais, Régis Rathmann, F. T. F. da Silva, Isabela Schmidt Tagomori, Marianne Zotin, André F. P. Lucena, A. Szklo, Roberto Schaeffer, J. Portugal-Pereira","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ad5f42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Climate change is one of the biggest threats to global food security, with observed impacts already affecting agriculture. This study aims to systematize and analyze the observed biophysical impacts and their evolution in agriculture in Brazil. For this, we carry out a systematic literature review that includes 1,844 articles in the first stage, and 53 articles with synthesized information retrieved. Temperature and precipitation are the most studied climate variables when considering observed climate impact on food production, with corn, soybeans, and sugarcane as the major crops assessed. We also identify regional patterns of both positive and negative trends due to climate change: 67% of assessed studies report negative impacts, 15% both negative and positive, 11% neutral relationships and only 7% reveal positive effects. The diversity in scope and methodological approaches across studies presents a challenge, as only a fraction sufficiently contextualizes baseline conditions, not allowing for a comprehensive understanding of impact attribution. Nonetheless, the literature spotlights productivity declines in cassava, cocoa, rice and wheat. As for corn, soybeans, and sugarcane studies reveal both positive and negative impacts, depending on baseline premises. The call for more transparent and comprehensive studies is urgent, especially to encompass a broader range of food crops, particularly in family farming systems and across diverse regional scales. Such studies are imperative for advancing evidence-based climate-resilient strategies in agriculture aiming to map and prevent negative impacts, while promoting positive outcomes in food production.","PeriodicalId":507917,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5f42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change is one of the biggest threats to global food security, with observed impacts already affecting agriculture. This study aims to systematize and analyze the observed biophysical impacts and their evolution in agriculture in Brazil. For this, we carry out a systematic literature review that includes 1,844 articles in the first stage, and 53 articles with synthesized information retrieved. Temperature and precipitation are the most studied climate variables when considering observed climate impact on food production, with corn, soybeans, and sugarcane as the major crops assessed. We also identify regional patterns of both positive and negative trends due to climate change: 67% of assessed studies report negative impacts, 15% both negative and positive, 11% neutral relationships and only 7% reveal positive effects. The diversity in scope and methodological approaches across studies presents a challenge, as only a fraction sufficiently contextualizes baseline conditions, not allowing for a comprehensive understanding of impact attribution. Nonetheless, the literature spotlights productivity declines in cassava, cocoa, rice and wheat. As for corn, soybeans, and sugarcane studies reveal both positive and negative impacts, depending on baseline premises. The call for more transparent and comprehensive studies is urgent, especially to encompass a broader range of food crops, particularly in family farming systems and across diverse regional scales. Such studies are imperative for advancing evidence-based climate-resilient strategies in agriculture aiming to map and prevent negative impacts, while promoting positive outcomes in food production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候变化如何影响巴西农业部门?系统文献综述提供的证据
气候变化是全球粮食安全面临的最大威胁之一,已观察到的气候变化对农业产生了影响。本研究旨在系统整理和分析观测到的生物物理影响及其在巴西农业中的演变。为此,我们进行了系统的文献综述,第一阶段包括 1 844 篇文章,并检索了 53 篇文章的综合信息。考虑到观测到的气候对粮食生产的影响,温度和降水是研究最多的气候变量,玉米、大豆和甘蔗是评估的主要作物。我们还发现了气候变化带来的积极和消极趋势的区域模式:67%的评估研究报告了负面影响,15%报告了负面和正面影响,11%报告了中性关系,只有7%报告了正面影响。各项研究在范围和方法上的多样性带来了挑战,因为只有一小部分研究充分考虑了基线条件,无法全面了解影响的归因。尽管如此,文献还是突出了木薯、可可、水稻和小麦生产率的下降。关于玉米、大豆和甘蔗的研究显示,根据基线前提,既有积极影响,也有消极影响。当务之急是开展更透明、更全面的研究,特别是涵盖更广泛的粮食作物,尤其是家庭农业系统和不同区域范围的粮食作物。此类研究对于推进以证据为基础的农业气候适应战略至关重要,这些战略旨在绘制和预防负面影响,同时促进粮食生产取得积极成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Responsible carbon dioxide removals and the EU’s 2040 climate target State-of-the-art bias correction of climate models misrepresent climate science and misinform adaptation Conceptualising global cultural transformation – Developing deep institutional scenarios for whole of society change Reliability and resilience of environmental flows under uncertainty: reconsidering water year types and inconsistent flow requirements in California Unequal economic consequences of coastal hazards: Hurricane impacts on North Carolina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1