{"title":"Enhancing Argumentative Writing Skills via the Process-Genre based Approach: A Quasi-Experimental Study among University Students in Ecuador","authors":"Bryan Alexander Gordón Fiallos","doi":"10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i4.12150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research project sought to examine the influence of the process-genre based approach on the enhancement of argumentative writing skills among B2 level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners at the Language Center of UNIANDES-CTT de los Andes University. Through a quasi-experimental design, a population of 45 participants was separated into two groups: the experimental group comprising 23 students and the control group consisting of 22 students. Pre and post-tests, modeled after the essay writing section of the FCE standardized Cambridge Exam, were administered and assessed based on four criteria (Content, Communicative achievement, Organization, and Language) in alignment with the B2 level rubric. By employing a mixed research methodology, this study integrated quantitative analysis of test outcomes with qualitative inquiry to derive insights from result interpretation, culminating in conclusions drawn from a comprehensive understanding of the broader context and participants' experiences. Statistical analysis through paired t-tests substantiated that the experimental group demonstrated notably superior progress in argumentative written expression, thereby corroborating the alternative hypothesis. The results underscored the efficacy of the process-genre based approach in improving students' proficiency in argumentative writing. Significantly, this approach furnished scaffolding for writing instruction, facilitating the formulation and execution of coherent and cohesive argumentative essays. It boosted learners' confidence and self-esteem, while also refining strategic planning, organizational, and meticulous editing skills. In conclusion, the integration of the process-genre based approach positively influenced students' writing capabilities, underscoring its pivotal role in skill cultivation and fostering an enriching environment for refining argumentative writing competencies.","PeriodicalId":504938,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar","volume":"130 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i4.12150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research project sought to examine the influence of the process-genre based approach on the enhancement of argumentative writing skills among B2 level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners at the Language Center of UNIANDES-CTT de los Andes University. Through a quasi-experimental design, a population of 45 participants was separated into two groups: the experimental group comprising 23 students and the control group consisting of 22 students. Pre and post-tests, modeled after the essay writing section of the FCE standardized Cambridge Exam, were administered and assessed based on four criteria (Content, Communicative achievement, Organization, and Language) in alignment with the B2 level rubric. By employing a mixed research methodology, this study integrated quantitative analysis of test outcomes with qualitative inquiry to derive insights from result interpretation, culminating in conclusions drawn from a comprehensive understanding of the broader context and participants' experiences. Statistical analysis through paired t-tests substantiated that the experimental group demonstrated notably superior progress in argumentative written expression, thereby corroborating the alternative hypothesis. The results underscored the efficacy of the process-genre based approach in improving students' proficiency in argumentative writing. Significantly, this approach furnished scaffolding for writing instruction, facilitating the formulation and execution of coherent and cohesive argumentative essays. It boosted learners' confidence and self-esteem, while also refining strategic planning, organizational, and meticulous editing skills. In conclusion, the integration of the process-genre based approach positively influenced students' writing capabilities, underscoring its pivotal role in skill cultivation and fostering an enriching environment for refining argumentative writing competencies.
本研究项目旨在考察 UNIANDES-CTT de los Andes 大学语言中心的 B2 级英语作为外语(EFL)学习者中,基于过程流派的方法对提高议论文写作能力的影响。通过准实验设计,45 名参与者被分为两组:实验组 23 人,对照组 22 人。仿照剑桥 FCE 标准化考试的论文写作部分进行了前测和后测,并根据与 B2 级评分标准一致的四项标准(内容、交际成就、组织和语言)进行了评估。通过采用混合研究方法,本研究将对测试结果的定量分析与定性调查相结合,从结果解释中获得启示,最终从对更广泛的背景和参与者的经验的全面理解中得出结论。通过配对 t 检验进行的统计分析证实,实验组在论证性书面表达方面取得了明显的进步,从而证实了替代假设。结果表明,基于过程流派的教学方法在提高学生的议论文写作能力方面效果显著。值得注意的是,这种方法为写作教学提供了脚手架,促进了连贯一致的议论文的写作和执行。它增强了学习者的自信心和自尊心,同时也提高了战略规划、组织和细致编辑的能力。总之,基于过程-文体的整合方法对学生的写作能力产生了积极影响,凸显了其在技能培养中的关键作用,并为锤炼议论文写作能力营造了丰富的环境。