A Comparative Analysis of Transitivity System in Model and Student Descriptive Texts

Enggar Pangesti Wibowo, Ayu Lestari, Merry Adrian
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Transitivity System in Model and Student Descriptive Texts","authors":"Enggar Pangesti Wibowo, Ayu Lestari, Merry Adrian","doi":"10.36722/sh.v9i2.2831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researches on ideational meaning have been widely reported, but rarely do they compare transitivity analysis systems on two similar texts. The aim of the study deals with the transitivity system of the descriptive texts of the model text taken from a TOEFL exercises book and the student’s text written by a tenth grade student of SMA Islam Al Azhar 15 Semarang. It also explores how the understanding of experiential grammar informs pedagogical practices. The research approach of the study was descriptive qualitative completed by textual analysis using Halliday’s SFL theory. The result of the transitivity system shows that the model text and the student’s text employed different types of processes. However, both texts present a similar transitivity pattern in the dominance of material processes and circumstances of location. One incomplete clause in the student’s text caused the attributive process not to appear. All in all, the main linguistic features of descriptive text, relational processes, are not accurately employed in the texts. Knowledge of experiential grammar brings potential benefits for both learning and teaching. It enhances student learning by providing an understanding of authorial intent and grammatical structure, and empowers educators to create useful instructional approaches to improve students' writing and critical thinking skills.Keywords - Descriptive Text, Ideational Meaning, SFL, Transitivity System.","PeriodicalId":435638,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v9i2.2831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researches on ideational meaning have been widely reported, but rarely do they compare transitivity analysis systems on two similar texts. The aim of the study deals with the transitivity system of the descriptive texts of the model text taken from a TOEFL exercises book and the student’s text written by a tenth grade student of SMA Islam Al Azhar 15 Semarang. It also explores how the understanding of experiential grammar informs pedagogical practices. The research approach of the study was descriptive qualitative completed by textual analysis using Halliday’s SFL theory. The result of the transitivity system shows that the model text and the student’s text employed different types of processes. However, both texts present a similar transitivity pattern in the dominance of material processes and circumstances of location. One incomplete clause in the student’s text caused the attributive process not to appear. All in all, the main linguistic features of descriptive text, relational processes, are not accurately employed in the texts. Knowledge of experiential grammar brings potential benefits for both learning and teaching. It enhances student learning by providing an understanding of authorial intent and grammatical structure, and empowers educators to create useful instructional approaches to improve students' writing and critical thinking skills.Keywords - Descriptive Text, Ideational Meaning, SFL, Transitivity System.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
范文和学生说明文中的转义系统比较分析
关于表意意义的研究已被广泛报道,但很少有研究对两个类似文本的转义分析系统进行比较。本研究旨在探讨托福练习册中的范文和三宝垄 SMA Islam Al Azhar 15 的一名十年级学生所写的学生文章的表意系统。研究还探讨了对经验语法的理解如何指导教学实践。本研究采用描述性定性研究方法,通过使用 Halliday 的 SFL 理论进行文本分析来完成。转义系统的结果显示,示范文本和学生文本采用了不同类型的过程。然而,在物质过程和地点环境的主导地位方面,两篇文本呈现出相似的转换性模式。学生课文中的一个不完整分句导致归因过程没有出现。总之,描述性文本的主要语言特点--关系过程在文本中没有得到准确运用。经验语法知识为学习和教学都带来了潜在的好处。它通过提供对作者意图和语法结构的理解来加强学生的学习,并赋予教育者创造有用的教学方法以提高学生的写作和批判性思维能力的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tubuh sebagai Manifesto: Pandangan Politik Sally Rooney dalam Normal People A Comparative Analysis of Transitivity System in Model and Student Descriptive Texts Penelusuran Struktur Cerita dalam Naskah Drama Terjemahan: Kasus "Badak-badak" karya Jim Lim Peran Pengetahuan dan Kekuasaan dalam Implementasi PTN-BH di Indonesia A Comparative Analysis of Theme and Thematic Progression in Descriptive Texts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1