Improving estimations of GHG emissions and removals from land use change and forests in Brazil

Bárbara Zimbres, J. Shimbo, F. Lenti, Amintas Brandão Jr., Edriano Souza, Tasso Azevedo, A. Alencar
{"title":"Improving estimations of GHG emissions and removals from land use change and forests in Brazil","authors":"Bárbara Zimbres, J. Shimbo, F. Lenti, Amintas Brandão Jr., Edriano Souza, Tasso Azevedo, A. Alencar","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ad64ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Brazil ranks fifth in greenhouse gas emissions globally due to land use change. As a signatory to the Paris Agreement, Brazil must periodically report its GHG emissions as well as present mitigation targets set in the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). The SEEG Brazil Initiative (Greenhouse Gas Emission and Removal Estimating System) generates independent estimates of GHG emissions and removals since 2013, and in 2020, the estimation method for the land use change sector has been improved. This study aimed to (1) present these methodological advancements, including the spatial allocation of annual emissions and removals due to land use change (LUC) in Brazil at a 30-m spatial scale, and (2) explore the emission and removal patterns observed in Brazil from 1990 to 2019. The method presented here is built upon – but improves – the approach used by Brazil’s official National Inventories to estimate GHG emissions and removals. The improvements presented here include exploring emissions to the municipality level and using an annual updated time series of land use and land cover maps. Estimated greenhouse gas emissions from the LUC sector ranged from 687 Mt of CO2e in 2011 to a peak of 2,150 Mt of CO2e in 2003. In 2010, removals nearly offset gross emissions in the sector, with a net emission of 116 Mt of CO2e. The trend observed in recent years was an increase in emissions, decreasing Brazil’s likelihood of meeting its NDC targets. Emission profiles vary across the country, but in every biome, the conversion of primary native vegetation is the predominant transition type. If Brazil managed to curb deforestation, the total GHG emissions from the land use change sector would decrease by 96%, mitigating around 44% of total emissions.","PeriodicalId":507917,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad64ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brazil ranks fifth in greenhouse gas emissions globally due to land use change. As a signatory to the Paris Agreement, Brazil must periodically report its GHG emissions as well as present mitigation targets set in the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). The SEEG Brazil Initiative (Greenhouse Gas Emission and Removal Estimating System) generates independent estimates of GHG emissions and removals since 2013, and in 2020, the estimation method for the land use change sector has been improved. This study aimed to (1) present these methodological advancements, including the spatial allocation of annual emissions and removals due to land use change (LUC) in Brazil at a 30-m spatial scale, and (2) explore the emission and removal patterns observed in Brazil from 1990 to 2019. The method presented here is built upon – but improves – the approach used by Brazil’s official National Inventories to estimate GHG emissions and removals. The improvements presented here include exploring emissions to the municipality level and using an annual updated time series of land use and land cover maps. Estimated greenhouse gas emissions from the LUC sector ranged from 687 Mt of CO2e in 2011 to a peak of 2,150 Mt of CO2e in 2003. In 2010, removals nearly offset gross emissions in the sector, with a net emission of 116 Mt of CO2e. The trend observed in recent years was an increase in emissions, decreasing Brazil’s likelihood of meeting its NDC targets. Emission profiles vary across the country, but in every biome, the conversion of primary native vegetation is the predominant transition type. If Brazil managed to curb deforestation, the total GHG emissions from the land use change sector would decrease by 96%, mitigating around 44% of total emissions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进对巴西土地利用变化和森林温室气体排放量和清除量的估算
巴西因土地利用变化造成的温室气体排放量在全球排名第五。作为《巴黎协定》的签署国,巴西必须定期报告其温室气体排放量,并提出国家减排目标(NDC)。SEEG 巴西倡议(温室气体排放量和清除量估算系统)自 2013 年起对温室气体排放量和清除量进行独立估算,并于 2020 年改进了土地利用变化部门的估算方法。本研究旨在:(1)介绍这些方法上的进步,包括在 30 米空间尺度上对巴西土地利用变化(LUC)导致的年排放量和清除量进行空间分配;(2)探索 1990 年至 2019 年期间在巴西观察到的排放量和清除量模式。本文介绍的方法建立在巴西官方国家清单估算温室气体排放量和清除量的方法基础之上,并对其进行了改进。本文介绍的改进包括探索城市一级的排放量,以及使用每年更新的土地利用和土地覆被地图时间序列。据估计,土地利用变化部门的温室气体排放量从 2011 年的 6.87 亿吨 CO2e 到 2003 年最高的 21.50 亿吨 CO2e 不等。2010 年,清除量几乎抵消了该部门的总排放量,净排放量为 1.16 亿 CO2e。近年来观察到的趋势是排放量增加,这降低了巴西实现其 NDC 目标的可能性。全国各地的排放情况各不相同,但在每个生物群落中,原生植被的转化都是主要的过渡类型。如果巴西能够遏制森林砍伐,土地利用变化部门的温室气体排放总量将减少 96%,约占排放总量的 44%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Responsible carbon dioxide removals and the EU’s 2040 climate target State-of-the-art bias correction of climate models misrepresent climate science and misinform adaptation Conceptualising global cultural transformation – Developing deep institutional scenarios for whole of society change Reliability and resilience of environmental flows under uncertainty: reconsidering water year types and inconsistent flow requirements in California Unequal economic consequences of coastal hazards: Hurricane impacts on North Carolina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1