Exploring model transferability in ML-integrated RPL routing for smart grid communication: A comparative analysis across urban scenarios

IF 4.4 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Ad Hoc Networks Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103626
Ahmad Mohamad Mezher , Carlos Lester Dueñas Santos , Juan Pablo Astudillo Leon , Julián Cárdenas-Barrera , Julian Meng , Eduardo Castillo-Guerra
{"title":"Exploring model transferability in ML-integrated RPL routing for smart grid communication: A comparative analysis across urban scenarios","authors":"Ahmad Mohamad Mezher ,&nbsp;Carlos Lester Dueñas Santos ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Astudillo Leon ,&nbsp;Julián Cárdenas-Barrera ,&nbsp;Julian Meng ,&nbsp;Eduardo Castillo-Guerra","doi":"10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Machine learning (ML) techniques have demonstrated considerable effectiveness when integrated into routing protocols to enhance the performance of Smart Grid Networks. However, their performance across diverse real-world scenarios remains a topic of exploration. In this study, we evaluate the performance and transferability of four ML models—Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Feedforward Neural Network (FF), Decision Trees, and Naive Bayes—across three distinct scenarios: Barcelona, Montreal, and Rome. Through rigorous experimentation and analysis, we analyze the varying efficacy of these models in different scenarios. Our results demonstrate that LSTM outperforms other models in the Montreal and Rome scenarios, highlighting its effectiveness in predicting the optimal forwarding node for packet transmission. In contrast, Ensemble of Bagged Decision Trees emerge as the optimal model for the Barcelona scenario, exhibiting strong performance in selecting the most suitable forwarding node for packet transmission. However, the transferability of these models to scenarios where they were not trained is notably limited, as evidenced by their decreased performance on datasets from other scenarios. This observation underscores the importance of considering the data characteristics when selecting ML models for real-world applications. Furthermore, we identify that the distribution of nodes within datasets significantly influences model performance, highlighting its critical role in determining model efficacy. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the challenges inherent in transferring ML models between real-world scenarios, providing valuable guidance for practitioners and researchers alike in optimizing ML applications in Smart Grid Networks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55555,"journal":{"name":"Ad Hoc Networks","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 103626"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ad Hoc Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870524002373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) techniques have demonstrated considerable effectiveness when integrated into routing protocols to enhance the performance of Smart Grid Networks. However, their performance across diverse real-world scenarios remains a topic of exploration. In this study, we evaluate the performance and transferability of four ML models—Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Feedforward Neural Network (FF), Decision Trees, and Naive Bayes—across three distinct scenarios: Barcelona, Montreal, and Rome. Through rigorous experimentation and analysis, we analyze the varying efficacy of these models in different scenarios. Our results demonstrate that LSTM outperforms other models in the Montreal and Rome scenarios, highlighting its effectiveness in predicting the optimal forwarding node for packet transmission. In contrast, Ensemble of Bagged Decision Trees emerge as the optimal model for the Barcelona scenario, exhibiting strong performance in selecting the most suitable forwarding node for packet transmission. However, the transferability of these models to scenarios where they were not trained is notably limited, as evidenced by their decreased performance on datasets from other scenarios. This observation underscores the importance of considering the data characteristics when selecting ML models for real-world applications. Furthermore, we identify that the distribution of nodes within datasets significantly influences model performance, highlighting its critical role in determining model efficacy. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the challenges inherent in transferring ML models between real-world scenarios, providing valuable guidance for practitioners and researchers alike in optimizing ML applications in Smart Grid Networks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索智能电网通信中集成 ML 的 RPL 路由的模型可转移性:跨城市场景的比较分析
将机器学习(ML)技术集成到路由协议中以提高智能电网网络的性能,已显示出相当大的功效。然而,它们在不同现实世界场景中的表现仍是一个有待探索的课题。在本研究中,我们评估了四种 ML 模型--长短期记忆 (LSTM)、前馈神经网络 (FF)、决策树和 Naive Bayes--在三种不同场景下的性能和可移植性:巴塞罗那、蒙特利尔和罗马。通过严格的实验和分析,我们分析了这些模型在不同场景中的不同功效。我们的结果表明,在蒙特利尔和罗马场景中,LSTM 的表现优于其他模型,突出了它在预测数据包传输的最佳转发节点方面的有效性。相比之下,在巴塞罗那场景中,袋装决策树集合成为最佳模型,在为数据包传输选择最合适的转发节点方面表现出色。然而,这些模型在没有经过训练的场景中的可移植性明显受到限制,它们在其他场景的数据集上的性能下降就证明了这一点。这一观察结果强调了在为实际应用选择 ML 模型时考虑数据特征的重要性。此外,我们还发现数据集内节点的分布对模型性能有显著影响,突出了节点在决定模型功效方面的关键作用。这些见解有助于深入理解在真实世界场景之间转移 ML 模型所固有的挑战,为从业人员和研究人员优化智能电网网络中的 ML 应用提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ad Hoc Networks
Ad Hoc Networks 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Ad Hoc Networks is an international and archival journal providing a publication vehicle for complete coverage of all topics of interest to those involved in ad hoc and sensor networking areas. The Ad Hoc Networks considers original, high quality and unpublished contributions addressing all aspects of ad hoc and sensor networks. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: Mobile and Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Sensor Networks Wireless Local and Personal Area Networks Home Networks Ad Hoc Networks of Autonomous Intelligent Systems Novel Architectures for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Self-organizing Network Architectures and Protocols Transport Layer Protocols Routing protocols (unicast, multicast, geocast, etc.) Media Access Control Techniques Error Control Schemes Power-Aware, Low-Power and Energy-Efficient Designs Synchronization and Scheduling Issues Mobility Management Mobility-Tolerant Communication Protocols Location Tracking and Location-based Services Resource and Information Management Security and Fault-Tolerance Issues Hardware and Software Platforms, Systems, and Testbeds Experimental and Prototype Results Quality-of-Service Issues Cross-Layer Interactions Scalability Issues Performance Analysis and Simulation of Protocols.
期刊最新文献
Reliable and cost-efficient session provisioning in CRNs using spectrum sensing as a service A hyper-heuristic optimization multi-task allocation in mobile crowdsensing based on inherent attributes A self-contained emulator for the forensic examination of IoE scenarios Performance evaluation for Q-learning based anycast routing protocol in unmanned aerial vehicle networks with multiple base stations Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1